Anonymous #1 15h

That too

6

Anonymous #1 15h

Which is crazy considering where Jesus was from lmao

5

Anonymous #2 13h

Have you seen how some of those (especially tradcath) conservative christians romanticize the crusader aesthetic?

-2

Anonymous #3 13h

Me personally I’m an atheist, but that doesn’t mean I’m not pro-religious tolerance. You’re not wrong in pointing out that no religion should get a pass imo. But just because a bunch of liberal democrats tend to do that with islam, it doesn’t mean we should be racist/xenophobic against the people who practice it

1

Anonymous OP 11h

If people were held to the same standards u would be ok with immigration. But when there are areas like Dearborn banning church bells but blasting Muslim calls to prayer, I’m against it. I believe in separation of church and state, but when what’s actually being proposed is trading out the good old boy Catholics with islam I’m just going to vote no.

1

Anonymous OP 11h

Look at the debate in England right now over the kirpan.

1

Anonymous #3 10h

I am ok with immigration though?? And that Dearborn church bell things is complete misinformation and a quick google search will tell you that lmfao 💀

1

Anonymous #3 10h

And to the kirpan thing in the UK—sikhs (not muslims) have been allowed to carry them there for ages with only this one incident (not to mention only a small percentage of sikhs carry these). This really could have been done by anyone with a small knife religious item or not

1

Anonymous OP 10h

So you agree with special rules that sihks are allowed to carry blades, while native English people are not? Special privileges for immigrants over the indigenous British people?

1

Anonymous OP 10h

Wrong

1