Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
I’ve been called a fascist, nazi, and banned from this app multiple times on this app for doing no other than stating my opinion. Charlie Kirk did the same thing peacefully, where you can’t “ban” him, so they killed him. “hey fascist” on the bullets.
upvote -8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

And I was called a domestic terrorist because a right winger shot him

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

What no one can deny is he preached for harm to others. Ironic you wouldn’t expect to receive hate when you spread hate. But we are better than him, we need to love, try to understand and live with each other peacefully, no matter the differences.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

hey there. i’ve never been called a fascist, a nazi, or banned from this app for stating my opinions, maybe i can help! have you tried not supporting palingenetic ultranationalism? that works super well for me!

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

He supported the great replacement theory which that “theory” led to a lot of mass shootjngs in minority communities

post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Here’s his thoughts on public executions clearly romanticizing violence if he wants 12 year olds to witness it

post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Where’s my 100

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Here’s him advocating for whipping foreigners

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

He also wanted to do away with sign language interpreting during emergency briefings which is just evil cause that pretty much means he wants deaf people to not know what’s going on during crisis

post
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w
post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

So do I get that 100 now or…

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Here’s Kirk saying the guy who tried to kill Paul pelosi with a hammer should be bailed out. How can one not say he supported a literal political assassination attempt

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

First half of racist propaganda

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

The second half

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

He’s scum and can rot

post
upvote 1 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous 29w

What was the opinion that you stated?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 29w

Freedom of speech is a fundamental liberty and someone stating their opinion, no matter how wrong, shouldnt get them fucking assassinated. He let people LIKE YOU debate, peacefully. YOU ARE THE SCUM

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

No one should be partying after a political act of violence and the fact that you are says more about you than me

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 29w

I agree with the latter portion of your statement, and finding a way to peace is fundamental to a functioning democracy. “When the conversation ends, violence begins” - Charlie Kirk. For someone peacefully debating conservatism to be construed as “spreading hate” for maybe having some opinions or statements you dont agree with, I think is antithetical to the latter statement. He just got murdered for it.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Bro crazy thing is the government didn’t kill him so why are you talking about the first amendment, it was a murder which is also illegal.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

He called for harm to others man. It’s not an opinion, it’s facts. I do not support harm to anyone, literally anyone. Sure you are right, he was definitely debating peacefully.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

A man who’s life was dedicated to having peaceful conversations about our country on college campuses to be murdered is pretty horrible. He was peacefully excercising his liberties in open debate. And he just got murdered for having opinions that are mild conservativism - perhaps even said something unpopular before! but peacefully debated it anyway - by your extreme ideology. So yeah, as an American that’s something unpopular to celebrate.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Is it mild to say gay people should be stoned to death or to claim black people are “prowling to attack white people”? Like maybe learn more about the person you defend

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Dude i dont know what kool-aid y’all have been drinking to reach this level of delusion. A guy maybe said stuff that was wrong. He did it in peace. Debated openly. On 99% left leaning college campuses. And you’re justifying feeling amoral and celebrating because of stuff he said that you dont agree with. You make it so easy to see conservatism is so less extreme than that…

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 29w

Idk if you think my political opinions are ultranationalist then maybe you should just kill me too. You’re the extreme one here.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Statically you are more likely to be attack by a conservative for your beliefs than a leftist

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Yeah no shit so kill me for it too? because you labeling my speech and political opinions as a nazi or ultranationalist makes it okay to kill me too, right?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Most of them are also mis-labeled. Like, you would all call radical islam ultra-right wing but the dems adopted palestine so idrk anymore. And a wrong doesnt make another wrong right, chimp

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Bro there’s a section dedicated to religion, stfu. You want to paint only one side as violent when time and time again right wingers have been outspoken in support of violence even before Kirk I see conservatives yelling about civil war fantasying about killing someone other than their ideology. You have no moral high ground defending the life of an outspoken racist, homophobic, evil man.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Bro find me one quote of charlie kirk fantasizing about killing someone for their ideology i will personally venmo you $100

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

You guys do this thing where the media labels him as “spreading hateful ideology” and then you guys say it without ever actually watching charlie kirk at all

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Yeah and I hope the guy who violently murdered him and wrote you’re political sayings on the bullet gets that treatment as well. That’s not unpopular At what point does a rise in extremism not warrent a response?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Read more in sending in more and more for you pookie

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Media news . com no bro i need the video

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

You’re a deluded individual

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Medianews . com would surely never take a clip out of context to perpetuate an agenda! never!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

What context would making certain people being executed for not siding with Trump ok?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

And I still have more

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

And Trump condemned the political violence on the democratic politicians in minnesota. guess one conservative thinks something so we should continue to perpetuate an ideology that is so extreme it’s resulting in innocent people dying

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Probably the guy who tried to assassinate him to start. That guy should’ve been and rightfully was killed

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Just say you’re still celebrating innocent americans dying because you refuse to accept your ideology’s responsibility in labeling every conservative opinion as nazi and ultranationalist

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

U dont get it and u know why. No video

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

You said quote dumbfuck, you can’t even read your own words

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

It’s a paragraph, not a quote. a quote is “When the conversation ends, the violence begins.” - Charlie Kirk (yes he actually said that)

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Guess it’s okay to kill him, right?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Paragraph? You mean paraphrase and no I was using direct quotes, he said bail out the guy specifically saying a “patriot should”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

So, hate to break this to you, but some media outlet grabbing ONE WORD from a statement he is making, in some various context, and then recontextualizing it is not a quote.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

It wasn’t one word idiot “some brave patriot should bail him out, what would his bail be like 30-40k?”

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

You’re running cuticles trying to justify or distract from the harmful narratives he pushes cause you can’t wrap your head around that maybe you supported someone without realizing how evil they were. Where is my one hundred dollars

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Dude taking two seperate accounts of a statement is not a quote

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

I gave you several quotes but you just skirt around them saying “that’s not a video tho” or “he didn’t say that completely” you aren’t running from this

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

Evil? Evil? Someone said stuff politically you dont agree with. And then you label them as evil. He was exercising his freedom of speech and assembly peacefully on college campuses. You’re labeling that as evil, because of something he said, opinion he held, or whatever, and justifying his murder is what’s wrong with this country.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Yeah dude wanting whip people, remove civil rights act, calling stoning gay people “gods perfect law”, pushing racist ideology is evil. You act like words hold no substance when words have been used to start the more evil actions in history

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 29w

He wrote “hey fascist! catch!”. Only an extreme leftist would do that. Comments say everything about why that guy exists in soceity - because left wing extremism couldnt handle someone exercising fundamental liberties peacefully. He had “wrongthink” which every they all call fascism, nazism, and the countries leader literally hitler. Peace and love turned to hate and violence. Recognize where the democratic party actually is.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Why you talking to others, where’s my 100 you said to find a quote of him supporting violence and I did several times now cough up broke boy

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 29w

Fundamental human rights granted to us by the constitution allow us to have freedom of speech. Idc what some hivemind interprets as factually “spreading hate”. When it starts drawing the line between what’s allowed to be spoken or not - with no other transgression on society otherwise - and and kills people for speaking peacefully, that is a transgression upon that right. Everyone should be allowed to speak in peace. No matter their opinion. It’s crazy to see the left argue otherwise

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

You must not know any libertarians, before you assholes hijacked the Republican Party there used to be a lot more of them

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

bro said “where’s my” is a quote go get the video lil man

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 29w

I think the libertarian’s are actually on the side of the party of free speech. A la the party that doesnt support killing people for saying something wrong, or having a wrong opinion sometimes.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

When you think supporting someone getting killed is the moral hill to die on

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

The crime of having political opinions and saying them on college campuses. surely we should celebrate them getting violently murdered. And i’m supposed to be the nazi man y’all got me fucked up sometimes

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Aweeeee someone’s lefty app wont let him say the wittle r word because leftys are anti free speech

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

The crime of wanting universal healthcare was apparently worth celebrating when 2 Minnesota lawmakers were gunned in their own homes. And also I remember you asking about Kirk’s beliefs in exchange for some monetary reward?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

What do you think free speech is? Like literally what do you think the first amendment says

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 29w

Still celebrating conservative violence?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Libertarians absolutely do support shooting people against their opinions. Have you ever read the second amendment?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

Are you running from me man?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 29w

Ur dumb as fuck

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 29w

need a video

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 29w

killing palingenetic ultranationalists is not extreme, letting them exist in society is more extreme

upvote 2 downvote