Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
I’ve been called a fascist, nazi, and banned from this app multiple times on this app for doing no other than stating my opinion. Charlie Kirk did the same thing peacefully, where you can’t “ban” him, so they killed him. “hey fascist” on the bullets.
upvote -8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

And I was called a domestic terrorist because a right winger shot him

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

What no one can deny is he preached for harm to others. Ironic you wouldn’t expect to receive hate when you spread hate. But we are better than him, we need to love, try to understand and live with each other peacefully, no matter the differences.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

hey there. i’ve never been called a fascist, a nazi, or banned from this app for stating my opinions, maybe i can help! have you tried not supporting palingenetic ultranationalism? that works super well for me!

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

He supported the great replacement theory which that “theory” led to a lot of mass shootjngs in minority communities

post
upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Here’s his thoughts on public executions clearly romanticizing violence if he wants 12 year olds to witness it

post
upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Where’s my 100

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Here’s him advocating for whipping foreigners

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

He also wanted to do away with sign language interpreting during emergency briefings which is just evil cause that pretty much means he wants deaf people to not know what’s going on during crisis

post
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w
post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

So do I get that 100 now or…

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Here’s Kirk saying the guy who tried to kill Paul pelosi with a hammer should be bailed out. How can one not say he supported a literal political assassination attempt

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

First half of racist propaganda

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

The second half

post
upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

He’s scum and can rot

post
upvote 1 downvote
🏴‍☠️
Anonymous 1w

What was the opinion that you stated?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

but I thought the left was the side of peace and togetherness? I thought everyone’s opinions mattered?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Freedom of speech is a fundamental liberty and someone stating their opinion, no matter how wrong, shouldnt get them fucking assassinated. He let people LIKE YOU debate, peacefully. YOU ARE THE SCUM

upvote 0 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

If thats freedom then so is me throwing a party and going death to all conservatives lmao

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

No one should be partying after a political act of violence and the fact that you are says more about you than me

upvote 0 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

But a guy can say civil rights were a mistake and you’re ok with mourning his death? Rules for thee but not for me, or more believably you agree with him and are now crying

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

I agree with the latter portion of your statement, and finding a way to peace is fundamental to a functioning democracy. “When the conversation ends, violence begins” - Charlie Kirk. For someone peacefully debating conservatism to be construed as “spreading hate” for maybe having some opinions or statements you dont agree with, I think is antithetical to the latter statement. He just got murdered for it.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Bro crazy thing is the government didn’t kill him so why are you talking about the first amendment, it was a murder which is also illegal.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

He called for harm to others man. It’s not an opinion, it’s facts. I do not support harm to anyone, literally anyone. Sure you are right, he was definitely debating peacefully.

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

yes don’t let a couple of people define a whole movement. Generalization is what undermines the whole stance of reaching an understanding

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

A man who’s life was dedicated to having peaceful conversations about our country on college campuses to be murdered is pretty horrible. He was peacefully excercising his liberties in open debate. And he just got murdered for having opinions that are mild conservativism - perhaps even said something unpopular before! but peacefully debated it anyway - by your extreme ideology. So yeah, as an American that’s something unpopular to celebrate.

upvote -2 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Alright buddy we got it youre as racist as him no need to justify him as peaceful in any way shape or farm

upvote 2 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

If being against civil rights is mild conservatism then death is too good for all of you

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

Then don’t do that with the right. Not all of us support total bans on abortion and peoples civil liberties. But the left sure makes sure of that

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Is it mild to say gay people should be stoned to death or to claim black people are “prowling to attack white people”? Like maybe learn more about the person you defend

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

Democrats are the people labeling anyone with mild conservative ideologies with extreme labels every day! Literally Kirk was trying to peacefully reach understanding on 99% liberal college campuses what conservativism is. Time magazine cover of Trump with a hitler stash. Dems running on “Trump is literally hitler!”You tell me who is letting a couple people define a whole movement, and generalizing. Charlie Kirk just got killed for it.

upvote -1 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Hey ret*ard you know youre wrong so you’re regurgitating your points to a different guy instead of responding to us. Or did the bot youre using to write short circuit when you asked it to “defend this obvious nazi but try to make him sound normal”

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Dude i dont know what kool-aid y’all have been drinking to reach this level of delusion. A guy maybe said stuff that was wrong. He did it in peace. Debated openly. On 99% left leaning college campuses. And you’re justifying feeling amoral and celebrating because of stuff he said that you dont agree with. You make it so easy to see conservatism is so less extreme than that…

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

Here we go with calling conservatives nazi’s again. You’re an extremist who spreads ideology that gets conservatives killed. Fuck you

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Re what I said about Kirk’s “mild” points above dipshit, think for yourself you AI using sheep

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

The fact y’all think i’m an ai is hilarious

post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

He spouted Nazi talking points so yeah that’s a pretty fine line dude. Just cause you don’t pay attention doesn’t mean others shouldnt

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

nope, I don’t think like that. I am here coming out and saying it

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Anything but addressing the points

upvote 6 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Notice how you didnt deny being a ret*ard

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

yeah that’s crazy, extremism is the worst

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

I dont give a fuck what you’re opinion is of his talking points were. He was an american excercising his unalienable rights to free speech and did so in peace. You’re opinion of his opinions is not justification for murder in it of itself. And if you think so, you’re the extremist.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

100%

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1w

Idk if you think my political opinions are ultranationalist then maybe you should just kill me too. You’re the extreme one here.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

Notice how you’re left leaning dominated app doesnt let you say that word. Extremists like to have thought police and eliminate wrongthink. And even you deeply dont agree, because freedom of speech is good, actually.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Statically you are more likely to be attack by a conservative for your beliefs than a leftist

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Yeah no shit so kill me for it too? because you labeling my speech and political opinions as a nazi or ultranationalist makes it okay to kill me too, right?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Most of them are also mis-labeled. Like, you would all call radical islam ultra-right wing but the dems adopted palestine so idrk anymore. And a wrong doesnt make another wrong right, chimp

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Bro there’s a section dedicated to religion, stfu. You want to paint only one side as violent when time and time again right wingers have been outspoken in support of violence even before Kirk I see conservatives yelling about civil war fantasying about killing someone other than their ideology. You have no moral high ground defending the life of an outspoken racist, homophobic, evil man.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Bro find me one quote of charlie kirk fantasizing about killing someone for their ideology i will personally venmo you $100

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You guys do this thing where the media labels him as “spreading hateful ideology” and then you guys say it without ever actually watching charlie kirk at all

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Yeah and I hope the guy who violently murdered him and wrote you’re political sayings on the bullet gets that treatment as well. That’s not unpopular At what point does a rise in extremism not warrent a response?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Read more in sending in more and more for you pookie

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Media news . com no bro i need the video

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

You’re a deluded individual

upvote 0 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Lmao brokie cant stand by his words

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

Medianews . com would surely never take a clip out of context to perpetuate an agenda! never!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

What context would making certain people being executed for not siding with Trump ok?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

And I still have more

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

And Trump condemned the political violence on the democratic politicians in minnesota. guess one conservative thinks something so we should continue to perpetuate an ideology that is so extreme it’s resulting in innocent people dying

upvote 0 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You asked for proof got it now its media news’ fault. Just say youre a broke bitch

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Probably the guy who tried to assassinate him to start. That guy should’ve been and rightfully was killed

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

Just say you’re still celebrating innocent americans dying because you refuse to accept your ideology’s responsibility in labeling every conservative opinion as nazi and ultranationalist

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

U dont get it and u know why. No video

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You said quote dumbfuck, you can’t even read your own words

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

It’s a paragraph, not a quote. a quote is “When the conversation ends, the violence begins.” - Charlie Kirk (yes he actually said that)

upvote 0 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yeah we know why cuz youre a broke retar*ded nazi

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Guess it’s okay to kill him, right?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Paragraph? You mean paraphrase and no I was using direct quotes, he said bail out the guy specifically saying a “patriot should”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

So, hate to break this to you, but some media outlet grabbing ONE WORD from a statement he is making, in some various context, and then recontextualizing it is not a quote.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

It wasn’t one word idiot “some brave patriot should bail him out, what would his bail be like 30-40k?”

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You’re running cuticles trying to justify or distract from the harmful narratives he pushes cause you can’t wrap your head around that maybe you supported someone without realizing how evil they were. Where is my one hundred dollars

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Dude taking two seperate accounts of a statement is not a quote

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

I gave you several quotes but you just skirt around them saying “that’s not a video tho” or “he didn’t say that completely” you aren’t running from this

upvote 2 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Bro is unemployed as hell he realized he isnt built for this

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Evil? Evil? Someone said stuff politically you dont agree with. And then you label them as evil. He was exercising his freedom of speech and assembly peacefully on college campuses. You’re labeling that as evil, because of something he said, opinion he held, or whatever, and justifying his murder is what’s wrong with this country.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Yeah dude wanting whip people, remove civil rights act, calling stoning gay people “gods perfect law”, pushing racist ideology is evil. You act like words hold no substance when words have been used to start the more evil actions in history

upvote 2 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

No genuinely drop all that his ass needs to pay you. You do not need to give him more proof he had proof and now hes backpedaling because hes broke

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

He wrote “hey fascist! catch!”. Only an extreme leftist would do that. Comments say everything about why that guy exists in soceity - because left wing extremism couldnt handle someone exercising fundamental liberties peacefully. He had “wrongthink” which every they all call fascism, nazism, and the countries leader literally hitler. Peace and love turned to hate and violence. Recognize where the democratic party actually is.

upvote -1 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Only leftists can hate fascists is a hell of a hill to die on

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Why you talking to others, where’s my 100 you said to find a quote of him supporting violence and I did several times now cough up broke boy

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

Fundamental human rights granted to us by the constitution allow us to have freedom of speech. Idc what some hivemind interprets as factually “spreading hate”. When it starts drawing the line between what’s allowed to be spoken or not - with no other transgression on society otherwise - and and kills people for speaking peacefully, that is a transgression upon that right. Everyone should be allowed to speak in peace. No matter their opinion. It’s crazy to see the left argue otherwise

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

You must not know any libertarians, before you assholes hijacked the Republican Party there used to be a lot more of them

upvote 1 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Brokie went back to writing paragraphs instead of paying like hes supposed to. Use that free chatgpt judiciously buddy you have a limit on that

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

bro said “where’s my” is a quote go get the video lil man

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I think the libertarian’s are actually on the side of the party of free speech. A la the party that doesnt support killing people for saying something wrong, or having a wrong opinion sometimes.

upvote 1 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

When you ask for a quote and get a quote but you broke as shit so you pretend you dont know what a quote is

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

When you think supporting someone getting killed is the moral hill to die on

upvote 1 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Not listening to you till you open the wallet ret*ard

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

The crime of having political opinions and saying them on college campuses. surely we should celebrate them getting violently murdered. And i’m supposed to be the nazi man y’all got me fucked up sometimes

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

Aweeeee someone’s lefty app wont let him say the wittle r word because leftys are anti free speech

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

The crime of wanting universal healthcare was apparently worth celebrating when 2 Minnesota lawmakers were gunned in their own homes. And also I remember you asking about Kirk’s beliefs in exchange for some monetary reward?

upvote 6 downvote
🐋
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Someones venmo app doesnt let him pay 100 because hes got no job

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

What do you think free speech is? Like literally what do you think the first amendment says

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> dawn_whale68 1w

Still celebrating conservative violence?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Libertarians absolutely do support shooting people against their opinions. Have you ever read the second amendment?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Are you running from me man?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

Ur dumb as fuck

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

need a video

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

killing palingenetic ultranationalists is not extreme, letting them exist in society is more extreme

upvote 2 downvote