Anonymous #4 1w

If this seems wishful, I’d rather be that person than to be the one saying we have “no chance”. When there’s a will, there’s a way, and I refuse to give up or say “die”.

2

Anonymous #3 1w

i mean this entirely literally. conservative could mean one of two things: conservative government, or conserving traditionalist society. it means the latter. the former is libertarians. conserving traditionalist society is going back in time. idealizing the 30s to 60s, maybe as far as the 70s. fantasizing about white america as it never even was. segregation, white supremacy, "peace" and "prosperity" that never existed

6

Anonymous #4 1w

Of course, we need to make it clear why their belief in MAGA and the beliefs of MAGA are so wrong and instill that in people transitioning out of the cult. Make it impossible to doubt that the billionaires they feel are screwing them over have spent millions lobbying the GOP to continue screwing then over.

4

Anonymous #1 1w

You won’t do shit pussy

-2

Anonymous #5 1w

We're waiting collectively for action as you say this shit.

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Y’all won’t be able to put 70 million people in reeducation camps

0

Anonymous #1 1w

So your plan is terrorism?

0

Anonymous #5 1w

70 million people are not Neo-Nazis. Are you trying to imply they are?

2

Anonymous OP 1w

How else could they justify nation wide stochastic terrorism?

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

That's your interpretation of what I said. That's not what I meant.

1

Anonymous #5 1w

You just basically admitted that 70 million people need re-educated. Thanks for proving my point. Fries in the bag buddy.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

You guys say they are not us

0

Anonymous #1 1w

You people call every Trump voter a Nazi. You suggested they should all be forcefully reeducated

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Ok, what precisely, does collective action mean?

6

Anonymous #5 1w

They’re not. But people like Nick Fuentes, who are getting louder and louder, are. And they need to be stopped before 70 million ppl actually do become Nazis

6

Anonymous #5 1w

that was never said you schizo

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Majority of the left think the typical pro Trump guy working as a welder is a Nazi

0

Anonymous #3 1w

It was implied

2

Anonymous #5 1w

Every trump supporter is okay with pedophilia

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Ok, where's tangible evidence supporting this claim?

0

Anonymous #5 1w

AT THE VERY LEAST! THERES DEFINITELY MORE ADJECTIVES TO DISCRIBE TRUMP SUPPORTERS AND WHAT THEYRE OKAY WITH

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Typing in all caps doesn’t make your point correct

1

Anonymous #1 1w

And a great noun for you on the left, "terrorist."

0

Anonymous #7 1w

Epstein files are very tangible. He's everything but convicted at this point. Conspiracy theories are wild and he'll never release the files because he's in them and he's a fucking pedophile. You support this. Everyone who supports him is.

1

Anonymous #5 1w

you added the 70 million number. you added trump supporter as a condition. it was not implied. it was one of many answers, all alike, none saying that

4

Anonymous #7 1w

Opinion on this image please? Look very closely and understand the graph before responding.

4

Anonymous #5 1w

How do you feel about my graph?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Oh, I must of missed the release that implicated him on crimes against a minor. Unless that exists, you only have conjecture. Try again, terrorist.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

Consult the graph and respond after examining carefully.

0

Anonymous #1 1w

This chart is cooked. It inflates “Right-wing violence” by dumping every kind of actor into one oversized bucket, while slicing other ideologies into narrow categories. It only counts guilty verdicts, which means it’s measuring prosecutorial priorities, not actual violence. The result isn’t criminology, it’s a political infographic dressed up as data.

-2

Anonymous #7 1w

It's literally "right" and "left" lmfao. You're so stupid it's embarrassing.

4

Anonymous #1 1w

If it were literally just right and left, the chart wouldn’t carve out "Islamist" and "Other" as separate bins. That’s deliberate category rigging, lumping the right into one oversized bucket while slicing others into narrow subgroups. Add the guilty-verdict filter and it’s not measuring violence at all, it’s measuring what prosecutors decide to pursue. That makes the whole thing propaganda dressed up as data, and repeating it without understanding the method is just running cover for the spin.

-2

Anonymous #1 1w

So try again, terrorist.

-2

Anonymous #7 1w

So where is your political line where you say stop? You're obviously okay with pedophilia because your president is hiding the files he's implicated in, and you're okay with white supremacy because you're defending Kirk. So where is your line? You just want an ethnostate right? I'm asking out of genuine curiosity.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Where's your political line if you're cool with political assassination, terrorist.

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

And, no I'm just not jumping to conjecture, it's called rationality. You don't know what's in those files, so you can't say shit otherwise.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

Please lmfao y'all are such pussies. You all have pre programmed responses I swear to god

1

Anonymous #1 1w

No, you're just fucking that dumb and predictable. Try again, terrorist.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

We both know you're the terrorist. Everyone here can read a room except for you. Go back to the middle east they'll love you there.

4

Anonymous #1 1w

Oh, i must of missed the event where the right attempted to assassinate political opposition. When did that happen?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Also, the latent xenophobia is just proving my point.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

Latent?

2

Anonymous #1 1w

If you don't see it, then you've just proven my point.

0

Anonymous #8 1w

youre an abomination, my race is better than yours, you undeservingly take jobs from my race, and everyone is plotting to replace my race

5

Anonymous #3 1w

Huh?

0

Anonymous #7 1w

????

1

Anonymous #8 1w

He's mocking Charlie Kirk and what he said being at least blatant antisemitism and at most Nazism.

0

Anonymous #8 1w

sorry just some mislabeled things

3

Anonymous #1 1w

When did he ever say that

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

Are you stupid on purpose or are you just poorly educated like all Republicans are?

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Just cause I don’t know every quote from a guy doesn’t mean I’m poorly educated, and I’m still skeptical on the validity of that quote. Also the stupid take is believing that an entire party, made up of millions of people, is poorly educated. Also I’m not even a republican.

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

"you mislabeled him" "sorry i didnt know everything he said"

4

Anonymous #8 1w

Look at the IQ rate to voting statistics. Trust me.

0

Anonymous #1 1w

IQ isn’t the only indicator of intelligence, and that doesn’t explain why graduate students voted more for trump than they did kamala

0

Anonymous #1 1w

iq is a biased measurement and very frequently a pseudoscience, and is used very frequently in pseudosciences and for horrid rhetoric

2

Anonymous #3 1w

I’m sure there’s plenty of quotes that you’ve never seen before either, yet are still quick to call him a nazi

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

Source then

1

Anonymous #8 1w

I've seen plenty of quotes. I think that his viewpoints were damaging to society and still are.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

no ive been seeing him for a decade. the man spouted nazi rhetoric, nazi phrases, nazi ideology left and right. also... when the hell did graduate students vote more for trump? literally nothing supports that

4

Anonymous #3 1w

he was well known for being a white supremacist, spouting white supremacist rhetoric, saying the white race is under attack, and the like

3

Anonymous #8 1w

about as far off as you couldve been

3

Anonymous #3 1w

What rhetoric? Also he was never quoted to saying “the white race is under attack”

-1

Anonymous #8 1w

he believed in the great replacement theory, said jobs and opportunities were deliberately taken from white people in an attack on them, talked on the birth rate of white people as theyve been "deliberately discouraged from having kids" and said europe and america were under invasion to replace white people with muslim people and latino people

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Also I’ll cede on the voting thing. I remember the chart I saw wrong and I’m pretty sure it was higher among married graduate students, which I’ll admit doesn’t represent them as a whole like I stated earlier.

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Where does he say he believes in that theory

1