Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Unpopular opinion but both sides need to STFU about trans ppl. Dems: stop controlling people’s language and making ppl do things they’re uncomfy with. MAGA: leave them alone. They’re less than .0001% of the population, they have zero impact on your life.
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

one side is legislating trans people’s ability to exist in public, criminalizing the act of existing as a trans person and the other is not; and arguably is barely doing anything to even protect trans people genuinely what the fuck are you talking about? it’s not an unpopular opinion, it’s a fucking braindead and heartless one.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

current dems are like crickets about trans people unless sports get brought up

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

^^^

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 3w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

You don’t think it’s restrictive to try to remove HRT for adults?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

laughter and disbelief does not change the reality that people face on a daily basis.

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

It’s not a genocide omfg. The same shit happened to gay people and I myself am gay. We were outlawed from marriage at one point. Laws against people ≠ genocide or an incoming genocide. Go tell ppl in Gaza that ur in a genocide, they’ll laugh in ur face

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

When did gay people have laws created around being called he?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

yeah you’re one of those “lgb without the t” dipshits, don’t try invoking being gay as if it’s at all meaningful in this conversation, because you’re not the only person who is. did I say that it was a genocide? the quoted picture doesn’t even either, it states the “early stages” of one. the two are not synonymous, and it’s a critique and discussion on the increased aggression of the federal government towards specifically the trans community.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

you attempting to downplay (or outright disregard) that systemic aggression and oppression does nothing to change the situation, that’s my entire point. all it’s showing is the type of person you are.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Early stages of one implies that one is coming. It’s fear-mongering and it’s ridiculous.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

If people don’t support trans people then fuck them. Why do you have to try so hard to police peoples language. They aren’t going to change until it hits close to home and that’s the sad reality of it. If someone is religious and uncomfy with it, don’t force it on them. It’s stupid, but it’s their belief.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

take up your concern with the lemkin institute for genocide prevention and human security then, as the picture I posted was of one of their articles; but again this is merely a display of your own character than anything else.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

I will. You don’t know my character. You’re sharing fear-mongering articles.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

seems like you're madder about language than, i dunno, people being at risk of getting arrested or assaulted every time they have to piss in public. if you claim to support trans people, give a shit about real issues facing the community.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

my cousin who is a trans woman can’t use public bathrooms anymore where she lives in Florida. she could get a felony if she does

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I don’t think it’s wrong to be worried about the rhetoric surrounding vulnerable populations. i mostly agree with ur post tho. i guess i just think that the rhetoric the right is using about trans people is more of a concern than what the left is saying about trans people

upvote 4 downvote