Anonymous OP 6d

I wish I could move to Virginia and vote for him

1

Anonymous OP 6d

In what context lol?

1

Anonymous #2 6d

are you that insufferable you wish people’s children die?

3

Anonymous OP 6d

From the text message it sounds like he’s just making a point that people need to feel some personal down side to change policy, which I believe is sometimes true. Not that was “fantasizing about shooting them”

2

Anonymous blue__wave 6d

I’m in VA, been seeing commercials on these a lot. The texts were awful but I question how seriously the GOP really took these texts if they were made in 2022 and we’re just now hearing about them

1

Anonymous OP 6d

"I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some *** ****** every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”

1

Anonymous #3 6d

Fwiw, the GOP delegate was made aware of these texts in 2022 and afaik didn’t do much about it at the time - no legal action, statement, etc

1

Anonymous blue__wave 6d

are you denouncing it or justifying it?

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Pew pew

0

Anonymous blue__wave 6d

You think that would make it okay??? Literally wtf

1

Anonymous #5 6d

1 are you denouncing it or not 2 yes but this is from an actual politician who very well might be the new VA AG and this took 3 years to surface so Lord knows how many other messages are being hidden

3

Anonymous OP 6d

It depends what he meant like I said. I’m not gonna denounce something that’s true and not morally wrong. If he’s just saying that personal impacts promote change in policy that’s not even bad.

1

Anonymous #4 6d

No dipshit I’m asking for the context.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

1) Yeah I denounce it. 2) And still just one message, you have literally no evidence there’s more beyond 3) I could point towards republican politicians pushing wayyyyy more violence then this one off example you have

1

Anonymous OP 6d

But I would change my mind with more evidence that he meant something awful.

4

Anonymous blue__wave 6d

by openly wishing that her children die so she would possibly be on her side? how is that at all a justifiable point to make?

1

Anonymous #5 6d

0.0000005% vs 0.000005% of a political party

2

Anonymous #4 6d

The group chat that was leaked was literally multiple people and was almost endorsed by the Trump administration, with some members even working for the administration. Quit acting like this is a “well both sides are bad” issue when one is literally an entire group

1

Anonymous #5 6d

they were college students who were leadership in clubs, love how you said almost to phrase it like the Trump Admin was going to endorse them, they didn’t

0

Anonymous OP 6d

That’s why I’m asking for addition context idk if that’s what they’re saying. Theres a difference between making a point that if public policy is just motivated by personal experience is wrong vs saying I wish every republican child would die.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

Trump doesn’t need to endorse some random dipshit college kids he’s fine with political violence and Nazis. Jan 6th he pardoned everyone who did political violence for him he fully endorses it.

5

Anonymous OP 6d

There was literally a state senator, multiple staffers for national offices, and a White House employee in there. Fucking dumbass.

6

Anonymous blue__wave 6d

And you’re party has been responsible for the death and destruction of the BLM Riots, Gaza Riots in LA, Portland. Seattle, etc and one event that has been proven to be an inside job is your justification?

0

Anonymous OP 6d

These were facilitated, organized, enabled, and encouraged by the Democratic Party?

1

Anonymous OP 6d

It hasn’t been proven to be inside job nice cope.My party wasn’t responsible for any riots democrat leaders have denounced rioting constantly.

1

Anonymous OP 6d

And if you’re referring to the FBI lie that Trump keeps repeating, you realize Kash Patel Trumps own meat riding FBI director openly contradicted that narrative.

1