Anonymous #1 15w

Drugs, surgery, many different ways.

1

Anonymous OP 15w

I think you’re missing one

12

Anonymous #1 15w

Guns

13

Anonymous master 15w

Bingo!

8

Anonymous #1 15w

Missing the top cause of death in children in America too

6

Anonymous #3 15w

Obesity?

1

Anonymous #1 15w

More kids are killed by abortion than guns. But stopping gun deaths is also important

-7

Anonymous master 15w

Accidents/unintentional injuries

4

Anonymous OP 15w

LMAO

5

Anonymous #1 15w

1. Guns 2. Motor vehicle accidents.

7

Anonymous OP 15w

Holy fucking dumbass

6

Anonymous OP 15w

to be fair those aren’t kids tho

5

Anonymous master 15w

Abortion kills so many

-3

Anonymous #5 15w

They are living humans.

-3

Anonymous OP 15w

....

1

Anonymous OP 15w

Abortion doesn't kill people. Birth when the female body isn't capable kills people. Suicide from not being loved by their family kills people. Fetuses aren't people. Stop with this shit. People are capable of living independently.

1

Anonymous master 15w

That excludes so many disabled people who can’t live independent. Fucked up definition man

-2

Anonymous master 15w

Like 3000 kids are killed by abortion daily

-2

Anonymous OP 15w

You know what I mean stop twisting my words brother.

3

Anonymous master 15w

Excluding who is a person by brain power is crazy

-1

Anonymous OP 15w

behold.... CHICKENS

10

Anonymous OP 15w

Brain isn't fully developed until a person is 26. You cannot be serious saying fetuses have the brain power of an adult.

1

Anonymous #6 15w

If they’re fertilized, yeah there’s a chicken in there.

-4

Anonymous master 15w

I wouldn’t say that

-1

Anonymous OP 15w

I'm convinced pro lifers are intentionally dense.

6

Anonymous master 15w

Dm me and let’s actually debate this

-3

Anonymous OP 15w

I'm not going to DM you. It's as simple as this because I did this same conversation yesterday. If you think about this critically, 90% of the kids that are forced to be brought to term end up in the adoption system anyway. I've never met a conservative that would adopt a child.

5

Anonymous OP 15w

I am adopted, by my loving Democrat family. My Democrat pro choice girlfriend will tell you that they're capable of determining if her children are going to have a good life.

2

Anonymous OP 15w

they’re not kids cuz they’re not born yet when it’s still in utero it’s a fetus or an embryo

0

Anonymous master 15w

My fiancée is adopted. One of her sisters is as well. We plan to adopt. I do not think any of us have the right to say orphans deserved death.

-2

Anonymous OP 15w

Not just that, but she will also tell you that democrats are statically smarter than Republicans. She will tell you that men telling women how to live their lives and make decisions for them are primitive and unjust.

2

Anonymous OP 15w

She is not breeding stock. Not giving the option of modern medicine to a loved one is capable of killing them. If I unintentionally impregnate her, she's not forced to bring my child to term. I will not treat her as breeding stock which is how you want women to be treated.

1

Anonymous OP 15w

That's great. I guarantee you she thinks God is real and I'm going to hell. Fictional people and fictional places.

1

Anonymous master 15w

This has nothing to do with religion. I’m actually agnostic

1

Anonymous OP 15w

That doesn't answer my question. Pro life is strongly rooted in religion.

1

Anonymous OP 15w

In the event you accidentally impregnate your girlfriend, and she was expected to die, what would you do?

1

Anonymous master 15w

Great question. I’m actually for exception in the case of mothers danger, I think saving the mothers life is more important than her child’s. She can make the decision against but she can save herself

1

Anonymous OP 15w

So why is it so hard then for you to bridge that gap to all abortions? I mean, forced birth will ultimately end up with lives ruined and an increase in suicides.

1

Anonymous master 15w

Because I think there isn’t enough risk to justify killing someone. I don’t think an inconvenience is justification to kill someone. Protecting the mothers life, when in significant risk, is fine but elsewhere no

1

Anonymous OP 15w

Your justification makes no sense. It's fine if they kill themselves but if the parents don't have the resources to raise a child they just have to suffer.

1

Anonymous master 15w

If the parents don’t have the resources to raise a child, put them up for adoption. What I’m saying is that the chance of suicide is not worth killing an innocent baby. I think that having a 90% chance the mother will die is a significantly higher chance of death, that’s why it’s allowed.

1

Anonymous OP 15w

The adoption system currently doesn't and will never have the resources to keep up with this dumbass take.

1

Anonymous OP 15w

For the future of our society, please educate yourself. Hearing you say this shit hurts me knowing kids will suffer. It's like saying a terminally ill person shouldn't have access to assisted suicide. There's a crazy high risk of complications including mental health issues like I myself have. You're advocating for this.

1

Anonymous master 15w

I’m advocating for saving so many innocent kids. Nobody should choose who dies.

-1

Anonymous OP 15w

again they’re not kids

5

Anonymous OP 15w

Not kids until their born.

1

Anonymous master 15w

Innocent people my bad

1

Anonymous OP 15w

Not people until they're born

1

Anonymous OP 15w

Nothing else to say?

1