Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download

default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

My lib goat legal eagle

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

He changed the law

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

Send him to jail fr

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

This fucker is a Democrat puppet who is only mad that his job means nothing nowadays

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

So, you're defending dementia in public office? LE should've been calling for the 25th amendment to be called and shaming the cabinet for normalizing such behavior, but he's a puppet so he towed the line. Plus, if he actually thought Trump was going to destroy the constitution on his inauguration, LE could've done a 1/6 miltia but he didn't

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 10w

No he didn’t, he changed how it is enforced. Rules for thee, but not for he

upvote 29 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

He literally made videos about the illegal stuff Biden did

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 10w

He literally brushed away the fact that Biden covered up his health decline while calling for a ban on Trump on the ballot, only to have SCOTUS tell him he was a dumbf*ck

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

My choice is that he upholds a system run by objective war criminal r@pist billionaires while imprisoning minorities for the upholding of that system. He's no man of jUSticE, he's a s1ut for authoritarianism

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

I don’t get why you’re upset about the health stuff. I’m not a fan of it either, but it’s not illegal as far as I’m aware

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

Who, Trump or legal eagle? He’s vehemently against this authoritarianism

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 10w

Legal eagle

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

Dawg so many people could have done that too. Just because he’s focused on legal precedent, which itself is inherently more moderate than most political media outlets these days, doesn’t mean that he’s not doing what he can to fight against this

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 10w

"LEgAl pREcEdeNT" decided by corporate lobbyists and their billionaire backers, court reactionaries who hate science, and religious fundamentalists who don't believe in the constitution only to enter the law profession

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

That’s what the law is. He’s a lawyer. I’m not happy that the system is set up the way it is, clearly he isn’t either. But that doesn’t give him the authority to supersede law, especially on a platform where he’s representing his company.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 10w

He's a foot soldier for the system. He ain't doing no long march through the institutions. He is the enemy to the public who only happens to be popular due to a sleazy YT channel where he acts like SCOTUS on his camera, only to continue imprisoning minorities and the poor off camera.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

What about LE’s actions lead you to believe he imprisons minorities off camera? And wdym he acts like SCOTUS, he’s been calling out all of their horrible rulings lately.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 10w

You just said his job is to uphold laws that target minorities and the poor. Every lawyer does that or they're not lawyers. As for the SCOTUS, he totally acts like he can predict what new cases are going to switch the chip in his head to stop defending civil liberties or start defending tyranny. But he gets his mouth shut up by reactionaries on the court.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

He’s using the part of the law that protects freedoms and using that to illustrate the illegal nature of many of these orders. I’m not really sure what you expect someone to do. Not be a lawyer? We need them

upvote 4 downvote
🧦
Anonymous replying to -> #5 10w

*rebellious drumming intensifies* Take a chill pill he's a pro-bono lawyer with a fancy YT channel it's not that serious

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 10w

There's this CONSTITUTIONAL thing called a miltia, lawyers wouldn't be running they mouth when the people are armed and make the government scared

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> yellow_socks67 10w

He is defending a government building concentration camps. He's no different than the Weimar lawyers who defended the Enabling Act and the construction of Dachau.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 10w

If he was actually championing civil liberties, Trump never would have been on any state ballot as per the 14th amendment

upvote 0 downvote