
This is…questionable. Usually, whistleblower testimonies include more about the whistleblower’s background to establish their credibility. The date format used in most of this is non-American which is odd and along with the tendency to use bullet points and numbered lists, makes me think at least part of this could be written by AI. Finally, I don’t think any serious lab leak proponent can omit the fact that GoF research was also happening on US soil. When people who believe there was a lab…
Congress doesn’t just issue a request for a response from the director of the CIA because any random guy submitted whistleblower testimony. There are likely documents and other pieces of evidence we don’t see in this letter simply because it’s a request for a response. They can’t reveal all their cards at the same time, plus I have a hard time believing Congress would issue something like this over somebody they couldn’t even confirm was who they said they were
…leak only focus on the WIV but don’t address the possibility of the US government’s own research or research under Ralph Baric at UNC causing this, it feels like they’re just using it for political reasons and aren’t interested in finding the real origin. And mentions of Event 201 are classic bait for the conspiracy theorists, who think it’s so shocking that public health experts had been doing exercises to prepare for a pandemic caused by a virus that was bound to start one (and already did…