Anonymous #1 1w

If you support Trump, you support this man going into girls locker rooms and bathrooms with your sisters, mothers, and daughters

49

Anonymous #1 1w

This is a transgender man. Under your preferred legislation he is REQUIRED to go in to bathrooms with women and girls.

61

Anonymous #1 1w

You can downvote me if you want but what I said isn’t opinion— it’s fact. Trans women are required by anti-trans legislation to pee with cis men. Trans men are required to pee with cis women. If you don’t like it stop supporting the legislation and start focusing on the people who ACTUALLY assault girls and women. (Spoiler— it’s cis men. I’m guessing… like yourself.)

48

Anonymous #3 1w

#3 wants to post up in front of a woman’s restroom and check each woman for a dick lmao

36

Anonymous #4 1w

No, I think those people should have their own bathroom and have the decency to use them.

-13

Anonymous #3 1w

How do you enforce that rule, then?

21

Anonymous #4 1w

Don’t have the answer to that. But I know we are all sick of it, not just the right or the left. But it really is crazy to me that someone can identify as a woman, with male parts, and people think it’s okay for him to walk in a girls locker room or bathroom :/ There’s too many sicko men for this, like come on

-15

Anonymous #3 1w

Unless you have actual statistics that show a correlation of an increase of an acceptance of trans people with an increase of men posing as trans women to do creepy shit in women’s restrooms, I think this is a scenario you’re making up in your head because you don’t like trans women. Lol

32

Anonymous #4 1w

Okay fair, my fault for being genuinely concerned about the future safety of my children because gender doesn’t matter anymore. And it’s not that I don’t like trans women, I don’t like the effects it has on stuff like this. Literally nobody has a good answer.

-14

Anonymous #3 1w

Your “concern” for the safety of your future children is predicated on a made-up scenario, though. I genuinely don’t understand why you’re so hellbent on a problem that doesn’t exist.

27

Anonymous #3 1w

Agree with #4 here. In reality there’s factually WAY more cis men with penises attacking people than trans women with penises attacking people. If you’re genuinely concerned about your future children maybe you should address your homeboys instead of flipping out about women who are literally just trying to make a pee pee when they’re out getting food.

23

Anonymous #4 1w

Bro, stop dwelling on that. That’s not some end all be all for me, there are many other things behind my concerns, that’s just the easiest to talk about. I’m not some unreasonable person who hasn’t thought about this stuff before forming my opinions. And see how ur coming at me because I’m wrong ur right? Like wtf, have some human decency and realize you don’t have everything right. I’m not here telling u you’re wrong am I? No.

-12

Anonymous #3 1w

Stop dwelling on what? That you’re driving yourself to irrational conclusions on trans issues because you’re afraid of made-up problems? That is my fundamental issue with what you’re saying, haha

20

Anonymous #3 1w

No, I won’t stop bringing that to your attention. You’re making fears up out of nothing. It’s like someone from Upper is saying ‘What if all our professors start shitting in campus showers. Maybe professors should be caged so they dont shit in our showers.” Bro it’s not professors shitting in the shower and it’s not trans people attacking children. look around.

19

Anonymous #2 1w

Ur not bringing anything to my “attention”. And I am looking around. Looking at the entitled world where everything is a fight and I’m over it. I don’t want to debate yall anymore as it’s pointless, ur pig headed when I literally just said that’s not my only reason nor is it a made up fear. The trans stuff goes beyond bathrooms and locker rooms.

-11

Anonymous #3 1w

You’ve been wholly unable to substantiate why your lil’ bathroom scenario isn’t a made-up fear. Stats or sybau

18

Anonymous #3 1w

CRY 👏 HARDER 👏 YOU 👏 FUCKING 👏 SNOWFLAKE 👏 It’s all “wahh I care about gender meaning something and also you’re pig headed” every single fucking time with you. Grow up and act like a damn adult once in a while, this is embarrassing. Christ man, if I ever had to work a job with someone as whiny as you I’d punch my ticket early. Insufferable child

10

Anonymous #1 1w

That man is transgender. Biologically he was born female, and you want bathrooms done only by biological sex. By YOUR OWN STANDARDS he would belong in the woman’s restroom YOU want him in the woman’s bathroom, not “the left” or “the liberals”

15

Anonymous #3 1w

Hun, I used to think similarly to you. I’ve always accepted Trans people as a whole, but I did have internal transphobia when it came to discussions of this ‘bathroom problem’. There is no way to enforce who goes into what bathroom, if a creep wants to go into a girls bathroom, he’s going to go into the bathroom, regardless of whether or not he looks like a woman. Maybe instead of singling out trans people, we should focus on punishing people that take advantage of these situations.

3

Anonymous #3 1w

Or or OR Gender Neutral bathrooms. Also, stop being transphobic, it’s a bad look.

5

Anonymous #3 1w

He’s trans though, thought before it was “go to whatever bathroom the gender you were born with” now it’s changed?

13

Anonymous #1 1w

Another republican “we can always tell” failing to tell

10

Anonymous #8 1w

Crossing that one off my bingo card.

6

Anonymous #8 1w

Do you think every person who is “conservative” is exactly the same person? Because I have never said that in my life. Yall are mean😂 It’s ridiculous. Since when do you have to absolutely despise someone with different beliefs. I don’t hate yall and I’m not being whiny, like tf. I’m also a person who you guys think u can treat like garbage because I don’t completely whole heartedly agree with you. I’m most definitely not transphobic, but u guys clearly have ideological intolerance.

-3

Anonymous #3 1w

It’s not that you simply have different beliefs from me; it’s that your different beliefs would cause actual, empirical harm to trans people if rolled out and implemented. The harm makes your different beliefs bad.

12

Anonymous #4 1w

My belief that maybe they should have their own space?! I really don’t see how that’s harmful. Would make a lot of people more comfortable.

-3

Anonymous #3 1w

What’s downstream of your belief regarding restrooms is that trans women aren’t women and trans men aren’t men.

5

Anonymous #4 1w

Idc if u think it’s downstream, you aren’t no woman walking in my bathroom with a dick, I don’t see how it’s wrong for me to say that. It’s not an attack on them, I wish it would work that you could magically be who you want, but it doesn’t. People go through intense stuff that most can’t even afford. Just because I believe this doesn’t mean u should hate me.

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

“Yall are mean” as your actively being a bigot

9

Anonymous #3 1w

Smooth dude, smooth.

10

Anonymous #3 1w

And before you say it, dude is gender neutral.

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

I hope #3 realizes that there are possible biological exceptions for genetalia, genomes, and gametes. Which means that #3’s definition of “woman” sucks, because it doesn’t include all women and exclude all non-women.

12

Anonymous #3 1w

Your fear of women with dicks is literal transphobia.

5

Anonymous #8 1w

I laid it out for ya. That’s my side, why I stand where I do. Still don’t hate trans people mind you!!

-3

Anonymous #4 1w

Did u read the dna part? Explain that

0

Anonymous #3 1w

You deleted the dna part because it’s a stupid argument

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Your definition is ass, and spare me the “I don’t hate trans people; I just want to deny fundamental aspects of their identities!”

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

I think it’s a rather good one? Are u able to say why my dna test told me I’m female?

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

What kind of DNA test are we talking about? There isn’t ONE test for everything that DNA describes. Please be a bit more specific.

3

Anonymous #3 1w

Do you perhaps mean your karyotype?

10

Anonymous #3 1w

Your biology knowledge is at an elementary level, by your own admission. You are not ready for advanced biology.

5

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

More insults.. you know science actually backs up two genders right? Till you get to the identity part of things because anyone can be anything! And I was fantastic at biology thank you very much

0

Anonymous #4 1w

Oh but it’s in the dictionary so I’m sure it means something right?

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

Constantly deleting your comments is also a bad look.

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

this is Perry-level behavior…I’m suspicious

11

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

I haven’t deleted a single comment bruh🤨

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

You admitted that the now-deleted DNA test comment was yours.

15

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

Tis mine.. never deleted

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

the way literally no one can see those comments except you apparently, and somehow that’s still at 1 upvote?

12

Anonymous #9 1w

Is that better, believe me now🙄

0

Anonymous #3 1w

oh no i see your screenshots lmao, I downvoted them. I can’t see your *comment*

2

Anonymous #9 1w

Me neither, it’s nowhere to be found on my end.

2

Anonymous #3 1w

Whether the comment’s visible or not, the argument still sucks.

7

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

Okay, you have the right to think that

-1

Anonymous #3 1w

Yeah, I feel like I’m in the right to think that, too. The argument is poorly thought out, you attempted an analogy that barely transformed the question. And you were condescending through, rude.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

Throughout*

4

I’m a biologist. And you clearly don’t understand biology considering your responses

3

Right so do you want to see my course load? You want the classes I’m taking? How about the fact I graduate in December with a bachelors in biology and marine science?

7

You only know sad little high school biology, clearly. Also, biology doesn’t matter in the social construct of gender identity. You do know that gender identity has changed with every large civilization? Did you know ancient Egypt had 3 genders. Mesopotamia had dozens. Gender is not sex and will not ever be sex. Once this civilization inevitably dies and a new one forms, doubtful there will be 2

3

What part of that view is “backwards”?

2

If you talk about “woman” or “man” in biology you will be laughed at. Those words aren’t used in biology. Because they’re incorrect and could identify any person, as it’s a spectrum. And you also are ignoring (1.7%) 5 million us citizens that are intersex (diagnosed, there are possibly more that didn’t get a chromosome test), and to put that in perspective redheads are 2% of the us population. Only 0.3% more common

14

It did. The rise and fall of each civilization came with new genders. So how are you trying to factualize something that is fluid and has changed every couple hundred years?

11

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

Stating a social construct is a biological fact is backwards and incorrect. Ignoring intersex people is backwards and incorrect. Not understanding slightly complex biology is backwards and incorrect

8

Sir, madame, etc. You’ve added nothing to this conversation.

2

And I’m going to assume your major brings nothing into the topic. I’m going to assume based on the facts of what you are claiming that you’re nowhere near a bio major. I’m gonna guess some useless ass major like PGA or maybe a basic ass accounting major. If you were to try to take any college level bio course, you would not just fail out the professor will send you to a revisionary board because you would not be able to graduate with that mindset. It is just incorrect.

2

You have no arguments besides “Nuh uh”

2

My life doesn’t revolve around you, Perry

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

I think they blocked me 😂

6