Anonymous #1 31w

“I want the irresponsible country to have a weapon that can end the entire world”

-5

Anonymous OP 31w

Oh boy wait until you hear what other irresponsible and horrid middle eastern state actually does have nukes!

28

Anonymous OP 31w

Have you ever googled the Samson option? Very enlightening

14

Didn’t give money to them, it allowed them to use their own money more freely. Two different things. Would you rather let them have nukes or develop some more missiles that we can easily get info on and destroy?

10

So funding terrorist groups that we also are keeping tabs on and could once again destroy with their lack of capability and weaponry. Got it

10

Once again doesn’t give them anything compared to the US capabilities. I do hope you realize that if the US wants to/ needs to that they could glass them over before they would even have a chance to use any of those weapons.

8

And pulling us out of the deal allowed them to keep making said weaponry, along with possibly restarting refinement, and now we can’t keep tabs on any of it… so much better 🤣

8

Anonymous OP 31w

Brother, I got bad news about a certain state who thinks they have a religious mandate to conquer territory in the Levant and exterminate everyone in their way

12

Anonymous #9 31w

So are you telling me Trump lied about those bombings, or that he’s lying about the current war? Because either way, there’s a lie somewhere.

6

Anonymous OP 31w

And you think we are a responsible country? We are the only country that has actually ever used nuclear weapons on another country. Honestly I don’t think the United States is the one that shouldn’t be trusted with nuclear weapons because we have demonstrated that we are overeager to use them on another country.

7

If you gave a shit about allat we would nuke israhell lmao

1

Anonymous bongo_fury 31w

I didn’t even realize this had a double meaning until rn but I think I still stand by it

1