Anonymous #1 1d

also, are you ready to acknowledge that you’re a propagandist yet?

-2

Anonymous #1 1d

I am a propagandist for electric vehicles, even in the hypothetical scenario that they are collectively and entirely powered by generators that is still a lot less pollution and fuel consumption

0

Anonymous #1 1d

That last sentence is me using your understanding of how thermal efficiency works and making fun of you. You’re the butt of the joke, its satire

0

Anonymous OP 1d

so electric vehicles that are powered by fossil fuels… yes, we all know you’re a propagandist, you’re just too arrogant to understand when to give the fuck up in regurgitating your propaganda.

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

Is projection your method of self-affirmation? or do you do that whenever you’re feeling a bit insecure?

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

Do you still, after all of this back and forth Are you still not comprehending how much less fuel is consumed by generators compared to gas vehicles?

0

Anonymous OP 1d

Im LITERALLY saying “heres a hypothetical where every single vehicle is electric and powered by a generator, and in this hypothetical scenario there is drastically less global fuel consumption. I see this as a good thing”

1

Anonymous OP 1d

you can fixate on that hyper niche point as much as you’d like, it doesn’t assist your case. my entire topic of contention was about greenwashing, and the impact of and contribution to the anthropogenic climate crisis; you’re directly affirming my critique and you’re either too stupid, or too arrogant, to understand how. it’s baffling to say the least.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

Is that the reality? NO Would the cars being powered by solar/wind/nuclear be better? Absolutely Is it STILL better than the current system? DRASTICALLY

1

Anonymous OP 1d

that’s without even diving into your subtle denialism of the anthropogenic climate crisis, which you know you can’t be openly honest about because it will immediately and inherently discredit your entire perspective. this tactic isn’t working for you dude, it’s time to pack it up and get a new job.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

don’t make me start providing more receipts of your previous comments.

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

Oh my god I think you’re actually stupid Before you respond to this, how would you feel if you didn’t have breakfast today?

1

Anonymous #1 1d

you specifically said pollution, then subtly stated how “not that less pollution does anything come to find out though” you are not sneaky, and we all see through your terrible attempts at propagandizing this topic.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

there’s that new goalpost I was waiting for.

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

How many more times do I have to explain to you that the last part in that screenshot is me making fun of you. That is not a position that I hold. I am satirizing your incapability of understanding thermal, efficiency, and using that to make you the butt of a joke

1

Anonymous #1 1d

How would you feel if you hadn’t eaten breakfast today

1

Anonymous OP 1d

which you’re doing so in attempts to avoid critique of your own position and avoid having to meaningfully defend your actual positions. in other words, ad hominem. see how whenever I call you a fucking imbecile or the like, it’s always in addition to actually rebutting the positions you state? meanwhile, you merely attempt to defend yourself by doubling down and criticizing me.

0

Anonymous OP 1d

if you’re incapable of defending yourself, it’s okay to admit that. it would actually show a sign of maturity, rather than this seemingly arrogant desperation to be “right”

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Genuinely what is there to defend? Do you disagree That less emissions is a good thing

1

Anonymous #1 1d

(don’t worry, I don’t actually expect you to be able to defend your positions, I’m near positive you’re only holding them out of arrogant tribalism and refuse to engage in the slightest hint of self-reflection)

0

Anonymous #1 1d

And on top of that, if you hadn’t eaten breakfast today, how would you feel?

1

Anonymous OP 1d

did avoiding the topic while misrepresenting the conversation once again make you feel better?

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

here, I’ll move the goalpost just like you do: do you even recognize and acknowledge the anthropogenic climate crisis?

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

I think pollution is bad, I think pollution leads to bad things for the Earth Therefore, I am in favor of a system that produces less pollution I think that such a system is good for the environment

1

Anonymous OP 1d

Notice how that statement is exactly cohesive with my previously stated hypothetical with electric cars?

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Additionally, I’m curious how you would feel if you hadn’t had breakfast today

1

Anonymous OP 1d

oh that wasn’t my question, I was very specific. do you recognize the anthropogenic climate crisis? I.e. do you acknowledge how greenhouse gases, continued resource extraction, and other human activity has caused and is causing a major impact to the global climate cycle, and is predicted to increase the average temperate of the planet; resulting in potentially catastrophic impacts around the globe?

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

Or, are you merely weaponizing and propagandizing this vital topic of conversation in order to garner support for your preferred political ideologues and their financial interests? (next time let’s stay on topic and not move the goalposts, because two can play at this game)

-1

Anonymous #1 1d

Your comments read like you are arguing against pollution free air.

1

Anonymous #2 1d

I’m discussing anthropogenic climate change and the pollution of fossil fuels, and you think I’m against ridding our world of polluted air? if I didn’t make it clear enough: I’m advocating in favor of meaningful methods of reducing pollution, not merely hiding it in a different location while making ourselves feel better. why do you think I discussed the energy industry and the pollution it creates worldwide….

0

Anonymous #1 1d

So you're an idiot because EVs are a meaningful improvement, like more than 50% better. If you don't understand that, which it seems you don't, you just don't like clean air.

1

Anonymous #2 1d

my issue is people like 1 are being malicious. they don’t meaningfully care about pollution, they care about praising companies like Tesla (or Tesla specifically by nature of Elon musk, or possibly purely for their own personal benefit if they have stock invested within Tesla) I’m worried about actually addressing pollution at the source, rather than tending to our “image” if that makes sense.

0

Anonymous #2 1d

Are you intentionally dense? I’ve repeatedly said how the issue with EVs are the existing method for generating power, like atleast put effort into your chosen propaganda. EVs themselves are not bad, as I’ve always stated repeatedly. the issue is the continued reliance on fossil fuels to power them. how many fucking times do I need to repeat this.

0

Anonymous #1 1d

Tesla fucking sucks. Buy a rivian, a Slate, or literally any other company. BYD.

1

Anonymous #2 1d

oh my fucking god, here. this is what I wrote in my original post.

0

Anonymous #2 1d

it’s not about the EV themselves, it’s about how we source the power to fuel them.

0

Anonymous #1 1d

Wake the fuck up 😭🫠

5

Anonymous #2 1d

oh my fucking god. why don’t you sit the fuck down and actually read for once.

0