Anonymous #1 1w

nazis are nazis bro

59

Anonymous #1 1w

But please, the SS-Unterscharführer has a family

33

Anonymous #1 1w

“Everyone that disagrees with me is”

-5

Anonymous #3 1w

It’s not that deep

11

Anonymous #5 1w

Are we ready for the conversation that Charlie also has blood on his hands tho? Not in the same way but…he’s responsible for some shiiiiiit

41

Anonymous #2 1w

You’re right. It’s that simple

1

Anonymous #6 1w

Like what

5

Anonymous #6 1w

Can you say that in the mirror with a straight face? “Kirk said bad things so it makes sense why he got shot”

13

Anonymous #8 1w

I love how we minimize other people’s humanity down to “disagreement”

8

Anonymous #2 1w

I love how we minimize getting assassinated for political beliefs down to “you get what you deserve”

1

Anonymous #3 1w

When my opinions are minorities deserve rights, then yes the guys who disagree with me are nazis

26

Anonymous dawn_whale68 1w

Unless if the minority is a Jew in the Middle East. Then you don’t care

-3

Anonymous dawn_whale68 1w

I’m willing to bet you don’t actually understand anyone’s viewpoints when you call them Nazis

3

Anonymous #7 1w

He deserved to get assassinated, does that make you feel better?

10

Anonymous #7 1w

“charlie kirk talked about gun violence deaths as a necessary evil so it makes sense that it happened to him.” yes, i can.

18

Anonymous #2 1w

If you’re willing to say that over speech, you must accept this for everyone

0

Anonymous #7 1w

It happens to many people frequently in america, if you can’t accept that fact, stay in fantasyland

10

Anonymous #1 1w

Sure I dont when you start also implying that somehow jewish people are the minority in israel

6

Anonymous #2 1w

But you’re okay with people getting killed over opinions?

4

Anonymous #7 1w

You can go ahead and reread my first comment

7

Anonymous #10 1w

Actually that’s exactly what they’re saying. They’re equating Kirk to Hitler by saying we would react the same to their deaths, which, like I said, is not even close to reality

-5

Anonymous #8 1w

No dawg, it’s just no one knows the names off every person that helped Hitler get to power, it’s shorthand, but I see where you are coming from, when it feels like you’re being attacked, it’s hard to think clearly

25

Anonymous #7 1w

yes lmao the man was a neo nazi, i can imagine why certain people would want him dead

10

Anonymous #8 1w

but gang it’s because they’re both fucking NAZIS. why is that comparison difficult?? charlie kirk was a neo nazi, hitler was a nazi. yall are dense.

8

Anonymous #11 1w

The difference is, he never WANTED people to die. He more just said it’s gonna happen, but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have gun rights. Big difference people

-6

Anonymous #13 1w

oh excuse me!! he didn’t want people to die so he must’ve been a saint!! HE WAS A NEO FUCKING NAZI. HE SAID THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT WAS A MISTAKE. DENSE.

6

Anonymous #13 1w

They don’t care about the details. They just want to seem moderate without outright saying they wanted him dead.

-2

Anonymous #7 1w

y’all get so mad whenever ur favorite nazi kicks the bucket istg

7

Anonymous #7 1w

No point talking to them honestly.

0

Anonymous #11 1w

That word means nothing, nor do you likely know how to use it. I don’t watch Kirk, but considering how often it is used, I have no confidence in what you say. I’m not surprised if that kind of rhetoric helped this stuff happen.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

Hey so did these words come out of my mouth? Nope

1

Anonymous #7 1w

no dude, the man was a neo nazi by definition. i’m sorry that hurts your feelings for whatever reason, but that’s what he WAS. he spewed nothing but violent rhetoric, and then he died to violence.

9

Anonymous #2 1w

People do know those names and should, because that’s taught in history classes

1

Anonymous #7 1w

“No offense but I don’t know what I’m talking about, everyone I see use it, not really fwing with” I mean dawg atleast I respect ur awareness

7

Anonymous #8 1w

They were absolutely absurd opinions like “the civil rights act was a mistake” and he knowingly fomented hatred. I don’t agree with the Hitler comparisons though. He didn’t plan a genocide

3

Anonymous #6 1w

Like I’m saying that he’s responsible for other peoples deaths. I gaf if that means he deserved to die or not, I’m not arguing that.

2

Anonymous #7 1w

It’s used often because Donald trump, Andrew Tate, Ben Shapiro, and Charlie Kirk and more are influential figures in spreading traditional racism rooted in traditional southern “values” that just so happen to be a bunch of fancy words for the KKKs rhetoric. The word nazi is used so much nowadays, because Neo Nazis are everywhere, nowadays.

8

Anonymous #11 1w

I mean I’m not surprised by this reaction to the raid. Also makes sense considering all you see of BLM are the opportunists destroying property and the sliver of alphabet who actually do grooming. Don’t like the other stuff but raiding them isn’t the answer.

-2

Anonymous #6 1w

Thank you. I’m so tired of people acting like the word “nazi” is just an insult and opinion. It has a formal definition. If someone matches that definition, they are a nazi. It’s not a matter of opinion, it’s a fact.

2

Anonymous #7 1w

so you basically just said “it’s okay because i don’t like black people or trans people” of course you defend the nazi LMAO

8

Anonymous #6 1w

This is actually a really good point The political “southern strategy” was built in racism, but we traditionally exist in a very hospitable culture (created from our slavery economy). For me, I can be proud of our culture while expelling those bigots from the group or educating them. Conservatives should be more made about white supremacy corrupting their message (unless of course they are attached)

8

Anonymous #7 1w

Though in all honesty if your philosophy is that all serving cops are bastards I’m not going to act like people getting heated over it is unexpected

1

Anonymous #11 1w

I’d love to see him actually say this stuff because it is taken out of context and really proves nothing, not even close to him being a neo-nazi. Some of that is questionable, but again, not really to the level ur saying.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

What do you think acab means?

5

Anonymous #11 1w

That’s not what I said but okay this proves my point. I think you already had an opinion of me before.

-1

Anonymous #4 1w

I agree

1

Anonymous #7 1w

no you said BLM was an excuse for property damage which it fucking wasn’t. and you said trans ppl are groomers which they fucking aren’t. you’ve already proven you’re prejudiced, it’s not surprising you’d side with the nazi

5

Anonymous #13 1w

so charlie kirk proudly saying that the person who bails out a white supremacists who violently attacked the spouse of a sitting government official… ISNT neo nazi behavior??

8

Anonymous #2 1w

That’s literally what it means. All cops are bastards. Who if given orders to be malicious would do so. The only good cops are the ones who aren’t working anymore. But if we go by this anyone is capable and likely willing to bend the knee to an authority if they were pressed.

-1

Anonymous #7 1w

i think you’re getting the insult bastard and the word bastardized mixed up tbf

2

Anonymous #11 1w

Well in the philosophy cops would be bastards to the people they say they protect

0

Anonymous #7 1w

you’re still mixing it up. bastardized means to be inherently corrupt.

2

Anonymous #7 1w

I disagree with your last statement because this implies cops would protect you if you were pressed But #11 covered it, I think most people act in ways they think are reasonable without understanding the greater context

2

Anonymous #13 1w

also i’m laughing my ass off at this because the man literally said THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT WAS A MISTAKE meaning he doesn’t think minorities should have civil rights AND YOURE STILL SAYING HE ISNT A NAZI LMFAOOO

2

Anonymous #5 1w

Any murder, hate crime, bullying, or harassment that came from Charlie’s spewing of his ideology that advocates for the polarization away from marginalized groups, making that ideology sound reasonable and normal, allowing young kids and adults to then act on behavior they see addressed and presented as acceptable.

5

Anonymous #11 1w

Well man, give them credit, that’s just like a basic idea your average American holds. The only reason we can only compare to Nazis is partly under education, but also, Nazis are about the only people on the planet that committed atrocities worse than us

6

Anonymous #2 1w

Even then the only thing remotely neo Nazi in the definition would be the military-like response. BLM was a movement, and if he was ignorant and only saw the burning pictures his action would have been in reaction to that.

0

Anonymous #7 1w

Dawg, I literally have no clue what definition you are talking about, I thought we moved on from the definition of Nazis to the definition of bastardized This conversation falls apart being this erratic, take a breath

8

Anonymous #5 1w

Kirk promoted violence, hate, and Christian nationalism. There is absolutely blood on his hands just like there is blood on trumps, Biden’s, and bibi’s for the deaths in the genocide. None of them fired the weapon but the blood is on their hands.

7

Anonymous #7 1w

I agree with this. Guys he wasn’t perfect and said a lot of controversial things, but not Neo nazi. He DID NOT promote violence. Did you listen to him speak or just read the controversial things he said and get pissed off. Because when you read it, it sounds ridiculous and messed up. When you hear him and then he explains, it’s not the same

1

Anonymous #14 1w

Okay, those things contradict each other. What do Christians stand for? Not violence, hate, etc. You can’t promote those things and Christian nationalism

7

Anonymous #13 1w

I tend to agree, the left pulls shit out of context and scrutinizes the words and not the sentiment completely missing the point I’ll say this, I’m familiar with his position on abortions because it caused active rape threats on my campus when he visited of which was not there before. Sure, I hear you, coincident My point is not he caused that, my point is his words, whether he likes it or not have an affect on people. He activate seeks disempowerment, which harms people through policy. —-

1

Anonymous #2 1w

He does not have to say shit like “kill _____” he’s smarter than that. Or maybe he’s not even malicious. The material effects of his words leads to harm towards others. Regardless of his “good” intentions he paved the road that lead (us) himself to hell

3

Anonymous #13 1w

once again, how is saying minorities shouldn’t have rights NOT neo nazi behavior. you keep conveniently ignoring that point and plugging your ears going “nuh uh!! he’s not a nazi!!”

1

Anonymous #13 1w

He’s a Nazi. The very foundation of their belief system ( along with Christian fascism and white supremacy, all of which Kirk promoted) is hatred, violence, and killing others.

2

Anonymous #2 1w

Of course his words have an effect on people, and it’s messed up how some take it. But I guess from my standpoint, he wasn’t seeking disempowerment. He was being a citizen with a voice, debating people in a perfectly fine way. He said his opinions and people have the right to take it how they want unfortunately. Nobody is forced to listen to him

0

Anonymous #13 1w

once again he said minorities shouldn’t have civil rights “it’s messed up how some people take it”

5

Anonymous #13 1w

maybe just maybe PEOPLE SHOULDNT BE SAYING NAZI SHIT. can you just acknowledge that?? like HOLY FUCK.

2

Anonymous #13 1w

He’s platforming violence

5

Anonymous #13 1w

is there another way to take the statement “the civil rights act was a mistake”?? that’s not just a silly little opinion, bro is actively saying he doesn’t think minorities should have civil rights

6

Anonymous #14 1w

He never promoted “Christian fascism”. Leave fascism out of it, and maybe talk about things you are actually educated in thank you very much. You go tell his wife and the Christians in the world that they support hatred, violence, and killing others, we will roll our eyes and laugh. It’s actually the opposite, hence we aren’t out killing people with the guns we own.

-1

Anonymous #13 1w

OMFG.

10

Anonymous #13 1w

I absolutely agree with him being a citizen with a voice and no one having to listen It’s hard to claim he wasn’t activately seeking disempowerment. Even then, if he wasn’t, he still had an affect I’m just a shitty person that puts numbers into a computer for a living, but I recognize me acting recklessly with the power I have surmounted is unethical and I’ll come back to harm me. Shit dude, my voice means nothing, but I still feel bad when I hurt someone’s feelings yk? Gotta take some respo

2

Anonymous #13 1w

IM SORRY YOU WANNA DICK RIDE NAZIS SO BAD BRO JESUS CHRIST

11

Anonymous #13 1w

once again, you still haven’t said ANYTHING about him saying minorities shouldn’t have rights. do you agree with that??

10

Anonymous #13 1w

You are not a Christian. You are a follower of the devil. Kirk promoted Christian nationalism, theocracy, patriarchy, white supremacy, fascism, and genocide. He covered for his hate and bigotry with American evangelicalism. He is burning in hell.

5

Anonymous #13 1w

Dude, as someone that lives in the Bible Belt and grew up a southern Baptist (the division that split off on the specific issue of slavery) you know good and well some of the most hateful people exist in the church Let’s be realistic

6

Anonymous #11 1w

First, u need to calm down. All worked up in a comment section you are.. but I can acknowledge nobody should say Nazi stuff, I’d just like to see a video of him saying that and why

-2

Anonymous #13 1w

Listen to any of his speeches or debates, read any of his social media posts. There is a constant underlying if not outright sentiment that white peoples are superior, men are superior, America should be a white Christian theocracy and that anyone not fitting those desires would be second class citizens at best.

6

Anonymous #2 1w

But if we all go tiptoeing around so we don’t hurt anyone’s feelings, what would the world be like? We would all be mute.. we have to stand for what we believe right?! It sucks that views are on opposite sides of the spectrum and can’t meet in the middle because it makes it easy to hurt feelings.

-1

Anonymous #13 1w

we can’t meet in the middle because i’m black and you’re DEFENDING A FUCKING NAZI.

6

Anonymous #13 1w

Is being conscious of other people’s feeling the same thing as tiptoeing?

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Are you baiting?

1

Anonymous #14 1w

I’m going to do a deep dive alright, and I’ll see if it’s just your interpretation and words or his. Not that it really matters anymore, he’s dead

5

Anonymous #13 1w

why should we try to make middle ground with people who don’t believe that certain people should have rights? or that certain races of people are better than others?? why would i want to find middle ground with those sentiments??

7

Anonymous #13 1w

You can not be serious in saying being concious (or not conscious) of one’s feelings is the same as taking away their civil rights and human rights. That’s what Kirk advocated for. Yeah no one likes him bc he’s rude and doesn’t care about others but we HATE him bc he’s doesnt believe in human rights or the constitution.

5

Anonymous #14 1w

He’s not, he’s responding to my comment about being aware of the power you possess within yourself

1

Anonymous #2 1w

It could be. Raising kids, if I never told them the truth because I knew it would hurt their feelings, would I be a good parent? I don’t think so. They would be entitled and ill-prepared for the world.

0

Anonymous #11 1w

If he was a nazi I wouldn’t defend him. But I think you just really hate the dude and that’s fine. You have that right

8

Anonymous #13 1w

Sure man, I see where you’re coming from I want to introduce the concept of “harm vs hurt” hurting someone’s feeling is exactly what you’re describing. My feelings are “hurt” when I am wrong about something. My person is “harmed” when you let me go around looking stupid If you’re a gardener. It’s hurts the plant when you prune it. It harms the plant if pour soda directly into its root system

1

Anonymous #11 1w

I believe all people should have rights and that no races are better than others🤨 Why do you think all conservatives are the same? I don’t think all liberals are the same

1

Anonymous #13 1w

because youre actively defending a guy who didn’t believe all people should have rights RIGHT NOW.

3

Anonymous #13 1w

so if you disagree with his viewpoint on that, why defend him and say he isn’t a neo nazi over and over

5

Anonymous #2 1w

So tell me how him speaking is harming people..

0

Anonymous #13 1w

you not gonna answer why you as someone who believes everyone should have rights are adamantly defending a neo nazi right now?

4

Anonymous #13 1w

If his words have an affect on and that affect goes on to create harm mostly through policy

6

Anonymous #8 1w

saying that you would react the same way to people’s deaths is not the same as equating them.

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Because that’s ridiculous and he doesn’t match that definition. He didn’t promote violence or want people dead, as I’ve already said. We aren’t getting anywhere, but the things you think are wrong are indeed wrong, but to call him a nazi and hate him so much isn’t right. He stood for a lot of good, but only I will think that because I am a Christian. Not a Christian fascist😒

0

Anonymous #13 1w

OMFG IF YOU SAY MINORITIES SHOULDNT HAVE RIGHTS YOURE A NAZI

5

Anonymous #13 1w

NAZI ISNT AN OPINION

7

Anonymous #13 1w

as a black person, ofc i’m gonna hate someone who thinks I SHOULDNT HAVE FUCKING RIGHTS BECAUSE IM NOT WHITE. do you fucking hear yourself??

10

Anonymous #13 1w

explain to me why it’s WRONG to hate someone who thinks people of certain races shouldn’t have rights??

6

Anonymous #13 1w

Okay, so progress can be made here If you believe all that stuff is wrong is wrong good. You should clarify your position on you think it’s bad that Charlie said that about the civil rights act Also, again clarification, it’s okay to hate Nazis, but your position is you think he’s not a nazi Do we agree just because Nazis are bad people. They can still contribute good through some pathways such as the Nazis being heavily invested in science. Despite all of their other awful qualities

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Charlie Kirk didn’t think black people shouldn’t have rights, moron

-3

Anonymous #11 1w

Did he actually say people of certain races shouldn’t have rights? Like those words?? And my guy, my dad’s black. I’m mixed, chill

-1

Anonymous #5 1w

Have you listened to any of his speeches or

5

Anonymous #5 1w

you’re the moron for not understanding that calling the civil rights act a mistake is synonymous with thinking minorities shouldn’t have civil rights.

9

Anonymous #13 1w

He said the civil rights act was a bad thing for one

8

Anonymous #13 1w

AS I HAVE SAID A MILLION FUCKING TIMES. he said the civil rights act was a mistake, he’s spewed tons of anti-black rhetoric. he once again called the person who would bail out a white supremacist a fucking hero. does someone have to straight up say “I HATE BLACK PEOPLE” for yall to read the writing on the wall??

3

Anonymous #13 1w

U being biracial doesn’t negate ur ignorance. So bringing that up doesn’t resolve u of being uneducated

7

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 1w

literally, it genuinely just makes it worse imo because how are you half black siding with the nazi

8

Anonymous #13 1w

like if this is true, why are you defending an individual who straight up thinks you shouldn’t have rights…

3

Anonymous #13 1w

What did the civil rights act do?

9

Anonymous #2 1w

I disagree with what he said about the civil rights, yes. But just because he believes that doesn’t make him a nazi. I know a lot of other people think that and I’ve heard why, but don’t really agree. And yes, bad people can contribute good, but some people think someone is completely bad for a couple things they say and disagree with, completely overlooking the good.

-1

Anonymous #13 1w

that is the definition of nazi.

4

Anonymous #13 1w

Yea no forget all of the twrrible takes he had on race, this man didn’t view SA as all that serous…

12

Anonymous #13 1w

it doesn’t matter if you agree, that is the textbook definition.

8

Anonymous #13 1w

once again, there’s a difference between an opinion and a fact. if someone fits the definition of nazi, they are a nazi regardless about whether you PERSONALLY think that’s true or false. it isn’t an opinion, it’s an objective observation based on evidence. the evidence is pretty fucking compelling when he’s literally saying minorities shouldn’t have civil rights.

6

Anonymous #13 1w

Cool beans I agree, just because he held views that Nazis would hold does not make him a nazi. As I’ve said, my position is the average Americans belief system is not too far off from what Nazis already believe, but there are extremely few people in America. You can look at that as America being full of Nazis, or America already having a belief system that aligns itself That being said, he doesn’t have to be a nazi to hold a lot of beliefs a nazi would hold, getting shortened in conversation

1

Anonymous #11 1w

It’s literally not tho

0

Anonymous #13 1w

believing in white nationalism and the idea that other races of people don’t deserve rights apparently doesn’t make you a nazi anymore. what’s your definition?

5

Anonymous #13 1w

your entire point has been “yeah he says nazi shit, but that doesn’t make him a nazi”

2

Anonymous #8 1w

If he can say abortion is worse than tho holocaust I can call him super hitler

7

Anonymous #2 1w

Yeah thanks for the conversation. Could say we are headed in that direction

4

Anonymous #11 1w

No, I more just don’t think he deserves to be compared to Hitler. That’s a bit far. Call him a nazi, fine.

5

Anonymous #13 1w

Yeah man thanks for being willing to have it. I appreciate everyone that contributed a lot of good passion, respect for yall as well

3

Anonymous #13 1w

That got an audible laugh out of me 💀

1

Anonymous #2 1w

I’m done😭

1

Anonymous #5 1w

Hitler only ever shot one man.

1

Anonymous #5 1w

hitler didn't directly kill people, his rhetoric did.

3