Look, I am very in favor of books, but some versions of the banned books trend feel a little tone deaf. If its “read these books because people in other countries can’t” that makes alot of sense, but the small faction of the trend that implies the American government is literally coming for your personal copy of a famous bestseller book, that reads (no pun intended) like a secular version of Evangelicals complaining of persecution in the US.
Absolutely, which is why librarians devote their careers to sourcing books that are appropriate for children. Republican lawmakers are not concerned with this though, their main concern is ridding schools of narritave that highlight lgbtq people, immigrants, or anything that’s critical of America. You can tell this is true because every time some gop lawmaker talks about “porn” in schools, they’re unable to back it up
I mean tbh I get it. Librarians are increasingly unable to do their jobs because of gop ideological overreach. If I was in their shoes I’d want to find ways to explain what’s happening to kids and this seems like a good example. Book bans are dramatic and should concern people
If you want to make a profound statement about banned books, put books like religious texts, ideological manifestos, and works published by infamous mass terrorists, and put what countries have banned or restricted their dissemination and during what years. The banned books trend makes a million times more sense for stuff published by Karl Marx, Hitler, the Unibomber, ISIS, and various cults. It doesn’t make sense for Twilight and The Great Gatsby, which, nobody afaik is banning in America.