Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Remember when conservatives told us all that [Insert democrat here] was going to send death squads to hunt down anyone who criticized the government? Now it’s “sending death squads after government critics is based, actually”

DHS asks tech companies for names, email addresses and phone numbers of accounts that criticize ICE

www.seattletimes.com

upvote 58 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4d

I don’t support that information being released, I don’t support the tech companies willingly giving up the data of their customers, and I also don’t support people like this being present in our society.

post
upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4d

Well shit bud if you don’t support people like that being here, we’re gonna need to deport some of the people in the government too, and a fuck ton of natural citizens in general.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4d

Oh and some of the billionaires living here as well, I forgot about them

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4d

Ngl I agree, except he should be in JAIL not deported. Why would we release him somewhere else to prey on more children??

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4d

Wait, I just read the screenshot again. Why did they take him out of prison???? He was right where he needed to be wtf

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4d

Released from prison and into ice CUSTODY so that he can be removed from out country. He’s not a citizen of our country, so our legal system shouldn’t be responsible for him

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4d

It’s not about releasing him versus imprisoning him, it’s about where responsibility lies. He is not a citizen of our country. It is unfair to straddle the taxpayers of our country with the strain of paying for someone like him to be in our prison system when his country of origin should be maintaining that instead.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4d

I find it so funny that people always assume that because I don’t want rapist illegals in my country, I somehow want similarly aligned billionaires here. This isn’t a pick and choose situation, and in no way did I present my argument as such. Regardless of standing or association they should be tried and punished justly. Part of that just punishment means that, since this guy isn’t a citizen of our country, we shouldn’t be responsible paying for his continued existence within our country.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4d

Since I’m already getting downvoted on this stuff, I’d love for someone to explain this to me: Why are we, as a country, expected to be responsible for the affairs of a foreign country when said foreign country does not permit us the same liberties?

upvote 0 downvote