Found the clip and I don’t really understand what he’s trying to say. “End goal of seizing the means of production”- what does that mean? Who’s seizing it? The government, the working class? Also, the rest of the clip is all over the place. It seems like he’s responding to a question on an interview but for the life of me I can’t find it or the question asked. Can’t say that one clip alone would make him a full on communist, I’d rather look at the policies he’s intending on implementing
And you don’t think Walmart went through drastic structural changes after their founder died? Spoiler alert: they did. The Walmart workforce wasn’t on public assistance in the 70s, 80s, 90s. They were fantastic jobs that developed into lucrative careers. Same with Amazon. One it went public and shareholders became involved, everything changed. You don’t even know the story of the things you try to argue, you fucking slug.
And it’s like this moronic troglodyte doesn’t even understand the difference between Facebook and Meta. Facebook when it was just Facebook being run by fuckface mczuck wasn’t an attack on personal privacy and international affairs. That didn’t happen until it went public and had to answer to… wait for it… shareholders. Care to venture a guess on how these things progressed with Twitter’s timeline, as well? Spoiler alert: it a re-run.