Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
Marxists are shallow If the root of your philosophy of the world is that all human historical development is based exclusively in class conflict and material conditions then you aren’t engaging in historical reality.
upvote 3 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

How so?

upvote 9 downvote
😵‍💫
Anonymous 3w

How is it if I was to swap exclusively for primarily

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

This applies mostly to the metropolitan leftist, particularly among the young, and not any legitimate leftist thinkers who actually have nuance in their over-arching worldview

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Ah I see, cause class conflict and material conditions usually do push history forward it’s a bit more complex then just I’m poor so I wanna become rich.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Can you name some thinkers you think are guilty of this and thinkers you find nuanced?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 3w

Noam Chomsky has a tendency to parrot talking points of similar unnuanced sentiment, though I know he’s a prolific and credible figure otherwise. Cornel west is a good example of a nuanced leftist thinker. I would avoid “thinkers” or rather personalities like Hasan, vaush, or other frankly stupid Internet personalities that many new to the left fall into.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Chomsky’s largest issue is his public speaking sucks total ass so he comes off stupid sometimes. While I believe sometimes hasan and vaush do it for better or worse to reach a larger audience who can have an easier goal. I cry everytime I debate vaushites about Israel Palestine and how it’s more nuanced then Israel bad Palestine good.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Yeah the high caliber public speaker is profoundly lacking in the modern political arena. Most people are informed by simple novelty of debate, appearing smart, or snubbing opponents, rather than having genuine beliefs and convictions that are downstream from higher values. That’s usually why I see “vaushites” or similar people have flip floppy views on issues like Israel Palestine

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Meddi hasan imo is a pretty good speaker that’s seen as more left leaning but he’s a rare case.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> bongo_fury 3w

Primarily is more accurate, but I find most leftists nevertheless tend to dismiss or belittle other levers of historical development

upvote 1 downvote