Lmao kinda brain dead take. We will give them a much better price. And better working conditions. Either way trump said he won't control it so we will have to wait and see.

-12

Anonymous #2 13w

Very nice

-4

Anonymous #2 13w

really got me with the photo

1

As in help them control the government yes

-10

No proof of him being a pedophile and almost every president has done this except two you buffoon

-10

you mean Virginia Giuffre why don't you look up her testimony. This is a really bad look gang do your research. :)

-4

let me trust some x post too nice

-5

Anonymous #6 13w

the photos of him were in fact removed from the files

16

Anonymous #6 13w

but you were right i looked it up they actually released the photo

0

Alright nice you got me gang. No evidence beaten in an argument what do you do attack me instead goated play dog

-5

you left out two pretty important parts of your evidence congrats

-4

it's even funnier cause you posted the photo they redacted

0

would you rather then not get paid?

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

Seems a little scummy

-1

he's released the files btw so he did what he said he would

0

I mean if people are working they get paid it's how a job works. But i agree with you wish more of it wasn't redacted however I hate to break it to you it's a department of justice issue. Not really Trumps he's not paying them You are!

0

Again as I stated at least he released it Biden had how many years to do so. And it's a DOJ issue. I'd be more mad at them.

0

how does any of that even prove trump was there?

0

Anonymous #6 13w

There was literally a deleted file with Trumps photo but sure

9

Brother you need to get more sun. The Dem fear mongering is bad for the health

-1

Anonymous #7 13w

The released the photo lmao

-1

Okay i don't disagree your anger is in the wrong place though.

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

Not everything is released and some documents got taken back lmao

5

So you would sink to the same level the maga hicks you hate would for what reason?

-1

I love this lol no war was started

-1

Anonymous #7 13w

You're correct they are going to continue releasing documents through this month. You can use google to look this stuff up.

0

Dawg what are you talking about

-1

here's a real pedo

-1

I don't even think we are far off in our beliefs your anger is just in the wrong spot

0

The problem is idk if he can't be arrested due to federal due process idk if anyone can be seeing as the case has already happened

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

That was under Bush btw

-1

He's not lying gangalang

0

Yes

1

Him actually being a pedophile, or even visiting the island. But there is none. And no witness has came forward and said he was there.

1

what was her name E. Jean Carroll?

-2

I'm asking who you were talking about with the head cut off thing. I can't find anything about this do you have a name?

0

Anonymous #6 13w

we literally created a power vacuum for corruption to run even more rampant now 💀💀💀 do we just not remember the middle east?

14

Anonymous #9 13w

Iraq happened because we withdrew these country ls can't support themselves. There's not really a power vacuum there they already elected an official there president stole the election. Just look it up gang

0

Anonymous #6 13w

🌚you think they elected a president already? currently the person running venezuela is trump, marco rubio, pete hegseth, and the VP of venezuela. Any leader apart of the maudro regime will be seen as a traitor to directly work with the americans. on top of the push back from the locals bc yes they’re happy their dictator is gone. but they dont want an american shill to replace it and use them as cheap labor for the Us goals.

8

Anonymous #9 13w

Edmundo González. I thought you guys were against dictators. Maduro was one.

0

Anonymous #6 13w

its sad to see American citizens cant see how imperialist nature radicalizes more people than helps. Venezuelan children will grow to hate the US if soldiers are on the ground in uniform, other countries will try to display their dominance and do the same thing we just did russia already is, now china just got their invitation to approach taiwan. theres levels to foreign entanglements its never A = B and thats it.

11

Anonymous #9 13w

1 you are american 2 we aren't imperialist. 3 venezuelan are praising trump 4 other countries were destroying their economy. Right now the truth is the future of venezuela is uncertain which is better than a future under a dictator. It's sad to see libs don't even know what the believe in anymore

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

1. im not a lib. 2.never said i wasnt american. 3.we are stripping venezuela for its resources and using them for our gain and threatened other countries if they dont tow the line as well. (textbook definition of imperialism) 4. we can’t even get our own economy in line how are we going to help another’s 🤣

9

Anonymous #9 13w

Sure you're not a lib lemme guess socialist textbook we aren't using them for our gain yet. Either way i'd rather us use them then china and russia

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

america at large is and forever will be an imperialist nation, its why the industrial complex is alive, its why capitol hill only votes in unison for more military packages and aid. AMERICA LOVES WAR. and i find it so funny how maga changes its tune when their leader suddenly tells them to get over their morals and values. every elected official works and answers to us its about time yall start to realize that bro.

14

Anonymous #9 13w

i mean we have no colonies but sure and we didn't go to war with venezuela.

-2

Anonymous #9 13w

Also what maga morals have changed i think it's funny libs have changed their tune. nobody celebrated the ceasefires nobody celebrates the capture of a dictator what happened to no kings. And you guys are apparently accepting until it's jews. You don't have any morals. if you accept everything you have no direction. and your states are riddled with fraud and scum politicians.

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

Y’all always change your goddamn tunes everytime your lord and savior tells you. The ceasefires weren’t celebrated cause they were always broken shortly after. Capturing Maduro sadly isn’t gonna do anything if he’s replaced with someone worse (and US is apparently taking over until that happens). Y’all act like you accept Jews as well. Don’t talk morals with all the hatred that goes on in your side and the fact that your side tried to cover up one of the biggest scandals in the U.S.

14

Anonymous #7 13w

nobody broke the ceasefires tho... And he's not going to be. Yall doomers have no hope. The US taking over would prevent the previously mentioned statement to not happen. So you're admiring you don't like jews. who commits more acts of political violence? And what scandal

-3

Anonymous #6 13w

nobody broke the ceasefire??? WHAT LMAO

11

Anonymous OP 13w

My bad i miss read something you are correct they have broken the ceasefire israel has i mean

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

either way I don't really care about palestine they started the was. It's bad kids are dying that's about all i care about. Most palestinian people would choose to destroy our country if they could

-4

Anonymous #6 13w

odd thing to say

6

Anonymous OP 13w

how if south korea started destroying china would you care or poland started destroying russia

0

Anonymous #6 13w

Israel broke ceasefire so many times lmfao. I never said I didn’t like Jews but with the amount of antisemitism rightwingers spew, y’all are no better. Also right wing extremists commit more political violence LMAO. And I’m literally talking about Epstein

12

Anonymous #7 13w

No they haven't. Wdym Biden could have released the files

-1

Anonymous #7 13w

Again why should i care about a country that would destroy us if they could

0

Anonymous #6 13w

venezuela is literally our colony now here’s your president saying we will control venezuela until a proper transition takes place which he gives no timeline or outline as to when or what that looks like. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZThdLePxS/

14

Anonymous #9 13w

Bro you think they'd have a timeline a few hours after liberating them... nice

-3

Anonymous #6 13w

Bruh what? Literally there are innocents being killed. Also Israel would do the same thing to us if we weren’t buddy buddy with them

8

Anonymous #6 13w

Biden didn’t campaign on releasing them tho.

8

Anonymous #6 13w

Man y’all love to defend this people

5

Anonymous #7 13w

But that's the thing we are buddy buddy with them so they won't that's how it works...

-1

Anonymous #7 13w

Trump is releasing them doj is redacting them. Either way what a dumb point "well he didn't run on it so it doesn't matter" Yall just wanna be mad

-1

Anonymous #7 13w

Love it

-1

Anonymous #11 13w

Your logic: “I’m anti American murders” “AHAH!!!! YOU BEING AGAINST AMERICANS KILLING PEOPLE IS ANTI AMERICAN” 🤡

26

Anonymous #12 13w

Yep

-10

Anonymous #11 13w

did you think this was a gotcha moment?

24

Anonymous #6 13w

….ur literally trolling how old are u💀

4

Anonymous #9 13w

i'm 10 nah not trolling tho

1

Anonymous #11 13w

White nationalist ahh logic

28

Anonymous #13 13w

That is a crazy assumption but alright

-7

Anonymous #6 13w

If you believe simply having the words anti and American in the same sentence give off the idea that someone is entirely anti-American even if the sentiment is against a morally reprehensible action by the US government, I’m going to assume you’re a nationalist, and probably a white one at that. So sorry king. 💀

9

Anonymous #13 13w

ah i thought it was bad to make assumptions tho. Pretty regressive

0

Anonymous #6 13w

Nice try at a gotcha moment but idrgaf if someone makes an assumption I’m afraid. 😕 I find that significantly less morally reprehensible than breaking international laws to instill a US puppet state for oil.

6

Anonymous #13 13w

So you throw away morals because someone else does... which i disagree with but sure

-2

Anonymous #6 13w

I don’t believe an assumption is morally wrong. It’s a biological/psychological phenomenon seen in almost every species. You know what’s not seen in every species? Invading foreign nationals for oil.

6

Anonymous #13 13w

We didn't invade gangalang yk what's wrong dictators.

-1

Anonymous #6 13w

Sending troops to kidnap a foreign leader and dropping bombs on foreign entities is a form of invasion king??

6

Anonymous #6 13w

I’m not saying dictators are not wrong, and I’m not saying the US couldn’t have removed him from power had the government gone through channels of international approval. That’s where is becomes wrong, not the removal of a dangerous dictator in general.

4

Anonymous #13 13w

a foreign dictator who elected himself. Also we immediately left Queen. No invasion no troops stationed

0

Anonymous #13 13w

what international channels china and russia in the eu?

0

Anonymous #6 13w

You don’t have to keep troops on foreign grounds for invasion. The moment we went there with troops and weapons without international approval, it was an invasion. Just because the invasion is technically over does not mean there was legally no invasion at any point.

6

Anonymous #6 13w

Yeah you know that thing that literally keeps us from the brink of another world war, the United Nations. I know most trump supporters don’t have a lick of understanding of international laws or charters, but as a member state of the United Nations we should probably follow the laws put in place, and ask for approval. 🤯

3

Anonymous #13 13w

i mean in the exact definition you are correct however we still did the correct thing in taking him outa there

0

Anonymous #6 13w

It’s not about the removal being correct or incorrect. It’s about the international implications of a first world foreign entity entering a foreign country without international approval. Have y’all even thought about how that may affect international relations? It’s not “yay no dictator” black and white. 🤦‍♂️

4

Anonymous #13 13w

International relations with WHO? who wiuld disagree with this move china russia mexico?

0

Anonymous #6 13w

Um yes??? Why are you dropping major world powers like having worse relations with them would not be disastrous? China is pissed. Do you not know we’ve been trying to stop them from invading Taiwan for YEARS. And don’t say “Taiwan should defend itself” because the moment china invades Taiwan, they control a huge chunk of the CPU market, which could impact our economy exponentially.

4

Anonymous #13 13w

china will never try to take taiwan because unlike china we'd actually step in. Our worse relations with these country's won't have an effect on that conflict

0

Anonymous #6 13w

There’s that nationalistic thinking again! “America is big and strong and china fears us.” Newsflash, they don’t, and they’re not afraid of war, they were trying to avoid more economic sanctions. Respectfully, believing that china, Russia and NK together could absolutely demolish our military is possibly the biggest glaze of America I’ve ever seen. Also hate to be the bearer of bad news, but china just put itself in a more respectable position on the international stage in terms of the UN.

12

Anonymous #13 13w

Correction: couldnt* destroy our military is a glaze

6

Anonymous #6 13w

You know, yall could just be normal Americans and go, “I support the removal of a violent dictator, but not going through official channels was wrong on the presidents part”, but you literally can’t help but gag on his agenda.

5

Anonymous #13 13w

Newsflash they do they didn't step in for a reason. And they aren't just scared of us they are scared of each other. And yes i am nationalist i love my country. Our military has more training then theirs we spend more money on ours we have a way larger and more advanced navy we would crush them. and the UN is our bitch it will be for a very long time. We have never been sanctioned once

-3

Anonymous #13 13w

Gaging on it hard !!!

-3

Anonymous #6 13w

Oh wow how does it feel to be such a redneck low iq embarrassment to the rest of the first world? 🎤

8

Anonymous #6 13w

“Scared of each other” and their entire alliance is the enemy of my enemy is my friend. If worst comes to worst, they will side with each other. “Our military has more training than theirs… we would crush them”. No amount of training matters and no one is crushing anyone in a full scale world war between every major superpower.

8

Anonymous #13 13w

i'm not a red neck i'm from the Chi and seeing as most of our country voted red i think i'm doing pretty good

0

Anonymous #6 13w

The red wave isn't a uniquely american thing btw

0

Anonymous #13 13w

Eh that's all speculation but so is saying we'd crush them we don't really know what would happen. If it went nuclear everyone would die. I'd say our military with other un nations would kill them pretty fast.

0

Anonymous #6 13w

Because Kamala was an awful candidate. Respectfully, any popular democrat would’ve blew him out of the water. 💀 Talk to me when midterms roll around bub. This administration is getting demolished in the house. Believing that “most of the country voted red” is true when less people voted this last cycle compared to the past cycle is insane cope.

4

Anonymous #13 13w

Alright 3 million less people voted you have a point who knows how'd they vote. if they all would have voted blue then that's a really sad sign about the democratic party's turnout rate. Mid terms are going to be mixed as they pretty much always are i doubt any major upsets will happen

0

Anonymous #6 13w

There’s something we can agree on, the democrats turn out rate is quite sad. However, that has a lot to do with the fact that an awful candidate who could form a comprehensible agenda and wasn’t even elected was the democratic candidate. The lack of transparency towards her agenda pushed away a lot of far leaning voters, and the fact that she wasn’t elected negated a lot of moderate/independent voters. And that can agree there won’t be upset in the senate, but even republican officials are

6

Anonymous #6 13w

Nervous because of house projections.

2

Anonymous OP 13w

Yes

1

Anonymous #13 13w

no it's because the democratic party is self eating which is a debate i don't want to get into right now and projections projected trump would lose... but he didn't

0

Anonymous xi.jinping 13w

Pro-Ukraine and Pro-Palestine? It just sounds like anti-imperialism

27

Anonymous #6 13w

1. Congressional projections tend to be far more accurate than president projections for many reasons 2. If the Democratic Party is “eating itself” then the Republican Party must be putting a gun to its head and pulling the trigger. At least leftists and moderates on the dem side can agree with each other on certain issues. On the rep side, you say something bad about trump and you’re outcasted. Ex. MTG, Liz Cheney

3

Anonymous #13 13w

Nah because conservatism is more of a reaction there's more diversity of thought the ability to adapt.. I guess we will see what happens with the elections congress might go blue. either way 12-20 percent less people vote in those elections so the presidential one is more of a show of what side has the nations support

-1