hot take: all ai software that generates art should legally be required to notify people, ideally via a lil banner or something, that it is ai generated and is not real.
AND it should credit artists it was based off of.
or photographers if it’s based off of a photograph
26
Anonymous15w
Many AI companies put an invisible and irremovable watermark on their generated images that can be used to identify if it’s generated or not
16
🍑
Anonymous15w
I’ve been avoiding posting my wok online bc I absolutely do not want it being used to train ai under any circumstances. It genuinely blows my mind how companies are engaging in mass plagiarism every minute but people don’t care
11
Anonymous15w
Based on
1
Anonymous15w
Would be very hard if not impossible to give proper credit with how generative AI works unfortunately.
0
Anonymous#415w
The problem is the malicious ones obviously won’t do that :(
5
Anonymous#515w
Yeah unfortunately, I think most generated content comes from big AI corps subject to regulations but there will definitely be smaller ones that will evade that watermarking, it will be up to human experts to deduce if something is AI
16
Anonymousjust_peachy_15w
There’s software that you can use on your image that fucks up any AI that puts it into its training data! One of them is called Nightshade iirc
6
🍑
Anonymous#715w
Maybe I’ll use that at some point. I love my photography, just I have no outlet to get it out there
6
Anonymous#715w
Considering the tool came out 1-2 years ago I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s no longer effective. Your best bet is probably to post it on a site that blocks web crawlers