Anonymous #1 1w

Well, that’s not exactly true.

6

Anonymous #2 1w

What am I missing? The elective abortion rate is 95-96% and excludes medical necessity AFAIK

-3

Anonymous #1 1w

That still isn’t a justification for restricting it. You shouldn’t be forced to have a baby you don’t want to have because the government said so.

14

Anonymous OP 1w

You can't seriously say this and simultaneously expect me to disarm myself when the government says so

-3

Anonymous #1 1w

I’m not expecting you to do that. I explicitly stated that I support the 2A in my original post. I’m just saying, gun control is a more justifiable position than abortion restrictions.

10

Anonymous OP 1w

I think gun control is only at best equally justifiable to any restriction on elective abortion

-3

Anonymous #1 1w

the misogyny in your thought. Wild.

6

Anonymous #1 1w

There are also ways to implement better gun control that minimally affect law-abiding gun owners. Worst thing is just more paperwork. If it saves kids from school shootings I think that’s a more than worthy trade-off.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Buddy please you cannot be singing the "save the kids" and at the same time singing the "take human life if women want to"

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

Maybe I’m just a stupid liberal but I don’t like women dying of sepsis in their car because their doctor fears prosecution for treating them.

5

Anonymous #1 1w

disingenuous argument point. Bro doesn’t understand critical thought.

5

Anonymous OP 1w

I'd say more just divisive than liberal, maybe neoliberal

0