Anonymous #4 6w

You’re* And if they really cared about conservation efforts, why wouldn’t they just donate without killing any animals?

20

Anonymous #4 6w

Shhh they don't actually care about the animals they just want to feel morally justified in celebrating someone else's death

-9

Anonymous #5 6w

Unlike republicans, who don’t hate wildlife and would never cut conservation efforts at a moments notice Remember when trump wanted this on his bill?

9

Anonymous #2 6w

Idk bro I'm not a republican

-7

Anonymous #3 6w

They don’t really care about conservation, I’m sure some do but they are willing to pay a inordinate amount of money to go kill a water buffalo which makes a huge difference for those animals. Far more impact than a fat chick complaining about it on Yik yak ever could do. Additionally if you ever think it’s funny or deserved or something to celebrate when someone dies you are not a good person. That man has a family that is destroyed by this

-10

Anonymous #4 6w

If you can kill an animal like that for fun you're not a good person. Who the hell sees a beautiful creature like that and wants to shoot it??

16

Anonymous #1 6w

No you don’t understand they wanna make enough money write off their taxes when they donate to wildlife charities to make even more money

7

Anonymous #1 6w

Animals aren’t made in the image of God, trophy hunters are not cruel to animals, we have dominion over them as humans. Find Christ, we are made in the image of God, a persons death is far more tragic than a water buffalo which

-8

Anonymous #5 6w

Your right, these people have murder in their hearts, they support this, they support hatred, and they likely support the murder of millions of unborn children every year, many I’m sure are guilty of that murder themselves

-6

Anonymous #4 6w

If I was allowed to say what I think should be done to the CEOs of fossil fuel companies on this platform as well as their mines, this conversation about “the left doesn’t care about conservation” would be over real fast

5

Anonymous #4 6w

Maybe, just maybe, don’t shoot animals unless you plan to eat them. Otherwise you’re doing a disservice to the natural world.

9

Anonymous #2 6w

Hatred and murder in your heart

-3

Anonymous #4 6w

Finally showing your true colors huh?

1

Anonymous #4 6w

“Uhhh umm conservatives are against abortion! Ha, that’ll show them. The left doesn’t care abt conservation 😤”

3

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 6w

Does it matter? Genuinely, they are doing more for conservation than your broke ass will ever do, you will be poor forever and own nothing, you will be a leach if anything at all

0

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

Guy would donate the meat to local tribes to eat but yea keep painting him as a horrible person immediately post death. You guys have no respect for the dead at all

3

Anonymous #4 6w

Hatred and murder…..because I want to prevent this planet from going to shit and killing all life?

1

Anonymous #5 6w

I didn’t say anything about that guy specifically, I didn’t even know he existed before a few minutes ago. Jeez, way to make assumptions.

5

Anonymous #2 6w

Wow how noble of you, will you do this by supporting conservation efforts? No you will do this by celebrating a mans death on YikYak? Oh....

2

Anonymous #2 6w

Abortion is murder, if you have blood on your hands you can find forgiveness in Christ alone

1

Anonymous #5 6w

Do you think the two are mutually exclusive?

3

Anonymous #4 6w

*leech first of all Second World f all you don’t know if this guy even did donate to wildlife conservations. More likely he was the real leech on nature. People like him are the reason conservation efforts are in place in the first place. Poachers and trophy hunters are a huge mass extinction event

5

Anonymous #4 6w

The Bible doesn’t recognize abortion as murder, though.

3

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 6w

Fr, idk why it’s controversial to say you shouldn’t kill animals you don’t intend to eat or harvest.

3

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 6w

Disgusting yall are digging your heels in so hard to defend the antithesis to conservation efforts because he maybe gave them some money after causing the problem in the first place

4

Anonymous #4 6w

So you think the IDF are all going to hell. I can get behind that

7

Anonymous #2 6w

Nah I just seriously doubt that you put as much towards the conservation effort as the guy you're celebrating the death of.

-2

Anonymous #5 6w

How tf would you know what I’ve done for conservation? Stfu, you don’t know anything

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

We are knit together in our mothers womb, this verse does not justify abortion at all, this is addressing an accidental death, when you killed your child you did it with malice and afore thought, you are a murderer if you have purposely had an abortion

-1

Anonymous #5 6w

I do more for them than he does by donating to them and ALSO not shooting animals in the head for a paycheck. Wild

3

Anonymous #2 6w

Don't know anything about you but I can make some reasonable assumptions

-2

Anonymous #5 6w

Reasonable assumption, like knowing whether or not they donate? That’s not reasonable at all, you couldn’t know unless you ask them.

2

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 6w

Trophy hunters and poachers are two entirely different things, you don’t understand what you are talking about, the cost he paid to hunt that water buffalo makes a bigger difference for those animals than you could imagine

-1

Anonymous #2 6w

Because you are poor

1

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 6w

I know you don’t, you don’t have the resources to do that

0

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

You guys don't donate as much to conservation as trophy hunters 😭. Nice try though

0

Anonymous #4 6w

How tf would you know that?

3

Anonymous #4 6w

I know they’re not the same?? That’s why they have two separate names?? How does that detract from my point?? Don’t argue semantics with me

3

Anonymous #5 6w

How. Would. You. Know? I keep asking that and no one’s answering.

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

You're a leftist on YikYak bro you don't have money

-1

Anonymous #5 6w

Ok so just admitting you don’t know anything and are assuming stuff to make yourself feel better. I think I’m done here, what a clown

7

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

It’s kinda wild how their defense for this guy is “haha brokies” and “but abortion???” It’s really odd

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

We all know you are poor, it’s alright pancakes

-1

Anonymous #4 6w

So does the soul enter when the sperm reaches the egg? After the acrosome reaction? After membrane fusion? After syngamy?

3

Anonymous #5 6w

At the very least, I can tell you that I DON’T donate high velocity lead to animals.

6

Anonymous #1 6w

Life begins at conception according to the bible

-1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

Ammo's not cheap, can't blame ya

-2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

That’s something only a fat girl would write

-1

Anonymous #4 6w

Plenty of conservative men have told me I have a fat ass ;3

8

Anonymous #5 6w

Well too bad we don’t live in a theocracy. What’s your secular reasoning that a fertilized egg counts as a child?

3

Anonymous #5 6w

Yes, but the scientific definition for what constitutes “life” begins far after conception.

4

Anonymous #1 6w

Life begins at conception, the moment new Human DNA is formed and life begins it is a Human life, any justifying otherwise is unquestioned killing of a human life, if you want to make an argument that shouldn’t be protected in the womb you can try that but it is without a doubt, scientifically, spiritually, logically a human life

0

Anonymous #2 6w

Eh I don't need to debate semantics to show you how abortion is bad. It's bad because me (a white man) could support it for eugenics reasons. Planned Parenthood was founded to disproportionately affect black communities and surprisingly abortion now disproportionately affects black mothers

1

Anonymous #4 6w

What is the scientific definition of “life” without googling it?

5

Anonymous #4 6w

Technically life only began once ~4 billion years ago

2

Anonymous #5 6w

Why are there no down syndrome kids in Iceland?

0

Anonymous #5 6w

I don’t need to debate semantics to show you how abortion is good. More women die where and when abortions are banned. Done.

4

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

Stopping eugenics is worth a few women dying, but that doesn't have to happen and you know it.

0

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

Not done, it should be dangerous to murder someone, I would hope if someone were to try and murder you it would be dangerous for them from the police or other people around you. It should be extremely dangerous for women to try to murder their children

2

Anonymous #5 6w

WTF of course women don’t have to die, they here just needs to be more humanitarian work done on planned parenthood. Banning abortions is not the answer though.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

Banning elective abortions and increasing the accessibility of state services for childcare is the answer

-2

Anonymous #5 6w

No it's not

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6w

Abortion should be abolished and the people getting aboritons should be charged with murder

-3

Anonymous #4 6w

You are actually insane.

6

Anonymous #4 6w

Horrific and disturbing mindset btw

6

Anonymous #1 6w

Sorry but you don't get an elective abortion to save a life, and stopping eugenics is more important than an elective abortion. There's a male birth control pill now if your man doesn't like pulling out

-1

Anonymous #5 6w

Sorry but you don't get to kill women by forcing them to donate their womb

3

Anonymous #5 6w

Elective abortions should at least be available through speaking with a doctor and letting them evaluate if its a good idea. That is the bare minimum

3

Anonymous #5 6w

An elective abortion can absolutely save a life.

3

Anonymous #8 6w

This. Let doctors do their jobs!

3

Anonymous #4 6w

Yes, because Jesus Christ and God would want us to kill animals ✊ that makes so much sense. Jesus would want us to not have an abortion and have both the mother and child die. Jesus (the iconically poor man) would want us to degrade others online by calling them “poor,” “fat girls,” (even though you’ve never even seen them?) and “leaches” (misspelling included). Ironic that you preach the Bible and finding God…yet your values seem the very opposite of Jesuit 🤔

3

Anonymous #5 6w

Me when someone doesn’t understand how systemic racism disproportionately affects minority communities: 😐😐😐

4

Anonymous #4 6w

“The moment new human dna is formed…” I’m so tired of these people who don’t understand basic biology trying to make determinations over half the population’s body’s lol. It’s nearly always the men shouting the loudest about it too 🤣. So by this definition when your skin cells undergo mitosis and DNA is replicated (IE new DNA is being formed), if you accidentally cut yourself, or do anything to kill said skin cells you should be tried for murder according to your definition.

5

Anonymous #1 6w

The thing is we eat animals for fun. I’m not sure there is really a moral high to search for unless you are a vegetarian

0

Anonymous canesfan 6w

So killing pets such as dogs is okay as long as you don’t eat them? Killing protected species is okay because who eats jaguar? wtf is this argument 🤣 Yes I love mass murdering cats but because I eat meat there’s no morality between killing living things and eating creatures?

1