Anonymous #1 12w

sure but im a 98 year old male

4

Anonymous OP 12w

W

4

Anonymous #3 12w

many crimes both literal and slightly more metaphorical including war crimes, sex crimes (that he committed thus ruining americas character even more) lmk if u would like more

8

Anonymous #4 12w

I am white americans

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Someone in your circle definitely voted for this then

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Absolutely not I don’t communicate with shitty people

1

Anonymous OP 11w

What are these alleged sex crimes?

0

Anonymous #3 11w

Donald Trump was held CIVILLY LIABLE for sexual assault

3

Anonymous #3 11w

And there were several other sex crimes that he had ADMITTED TO including when he would walk into the changing rooms (including that of minors) in pageants

3

Anonymous OP 11w

Are you aware the threshold for being found civilly liable, preponderance of the evidence, is much lower than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard in criminal cases?

-1

Anonymous OP 11w

The pageant owners are presumably permitted to go inside the changing rooms so not a crime.

0

Anonymous #3 11w

The act of being in changing rooms is morally questionable but permissable. They're talking about sexual contact.

2

Anonymous #1 11w

OP said walking into the changing room is a sex crime.

0

Anonymous #3 11w

Are you aware that being held liable as a billionaire still means that you were found to be liable by a jury despite the fact that you have enough money to pay for the top attorney?

1

Anonymous #3 11w

Walking into a dressing room that has children in it is absolutely a crime that involves power dynamics

1

Anonymous #3 11w

Especially considering the intentions of walking into a dressing room with undressed females

1

Anonymous #3 11w

Actually regardless of if the females were minors Lol.

1

Anonymous OP 11w

So? Being found liable is very different from being found guilty. I’m sorry you are having difficulty understanding that.

1

Anonymous #3 11w

Being found liable still means he was found liable of a sex crime 🫵😂

1

Anonymous #3 11w

The statutes of limitations are the reason he wasn’t on a criminal trial 🫵😂

1

Anonymous OP 11w

NY changed the statute of limitations for one year to specifically allow Jean Carroll to file her civil complaint. That should in itself tell you what a sham the civil trial was.

-1

Anonymous #3 11w

This is incredibly misleading; they changed that law incidentally to the lawsuit, and many other states have passed similar laws. You can also check and see how the law was publicly debated and passed by elected lawmakers, despite you framing it like some secret conspiracy

1

Anonymous #4 11w

It is incredibly naive to think Jean Carroll’s allegations had no bearing on the decision from NY Democrats to grant a reprieve from the statute of limitations.

-1

Anonymous #3 11w

Conversely, you would have to be incredibly naïve (by having faith in Trump’s word) that it did- you could argue that Carroll’s team opportunistically took advantage of it, but that wouldn’t explain why similar laws were passed around the country both before and after

1

Anonymous #3 11w

Actually by all means provide evidence of this #3

3