Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download

default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

I agree with this. Experts are experts for a reason. But we need to recognize that it’s based on evidence which they are equipped to understand, rather than personal authority. There’s lots of pseudoscience grifters that hide behind a degree.

upvote 25 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

Interesting that the yik yak anon is reposting a no-name twitter account claiming that we should listen to their opinion which is to bring back intellectual elitism. Get me a poli-sci phd please before I accept your opinion

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

Homeschooling should be banned entirely, no one that’s not formally trained as a teacher should be teaching our childre

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

Do you know how many times in history "the experts" have been wrong? Or short sighted or arrogant or complacent? Why is it progressive to be pro gatekeeping? People are allowed their own opinions and do not have to 2FA their every thought against current understanding

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 19h

Homeschooling is definitely a cancer in many environments. It is a necessity in concept, for people who have more nomadic circumstances or whose parents have them relocating extremely frequently or encountering major health and safety challenges. But it should not be allowable for any parent willing to sign a paper and say they are teaching the kids the required material. That’s how it is across the entire South. And it shows.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

I think kids should be required to be in school even if the parents are nomadic or relocating extremely frequently, it’s not just education, it’s social development for children tooo

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 18h

The point of the post is that expert opinions should be weighted more heavily, not that non-expert opinions don’t matter at all

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 18h

So we think allowing anyone to speak on anything is beneficial for society?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 18h

Interesting that you probably think this is a highly intellectual take. What you don’t realize is that you are doing little more than proving the point when you showcase how poorly you understand even the most basic, straightforward message.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 18h

If the parents are qualified or are hiring qualified tutors, what’s the issue?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 18h

bc it doesn’t replace the social development around similarly-aged peers, school isn’t just for learning the context but for learning how to interact with others

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 18h

Yet it’s these experts that are always relied on to solve crises? Obviously, more people should have access to high-quality education, but why should we take Joe Schmo’s opinion for any legitimacy versus a scientist who’s studied for years?

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Yeah but at the end of the day I’m still 100x more likely to trust someone with a degree purely because of the fact that it means they’re an expert in the field

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 15h

That is its entire purpose. Everything else is incidental.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 15h

And do you know how those experts are proven wrong? Data. Experimentation. Research. Rigor. Observation. Nothing was ever proven wrong because a three-toothed hillbilly read it on Facebook, heard it from a podcast, asked ChatGPT, or parroted an unfounded talking point they heard their favorite grifter peddle off on Fox News.

upvote 6 downvote