Anonymous #1 1d

And by the way, even in a state like Texas, there is an exception to protect the life of the mother. So if the child truly was in danger, the abortion could be performed legally.

-2

Anonymous #1 1d

Ok you can’t say “the left wing is dangerous and celebrates death (which it does)” and then act like the right hasn’t done the same. The difference being that the right wingers have mocked and laughed at dead children. And I’ve only ever seen the left mock grown adults being dead. And that’s so funny and interesting that you think a child should have to keep a baby. The question Charlie Kirk was asked was “if your daughter was 10 and she was raped would you get her an abortion”.

8

Anonymous OP 1d

The automatic answer should be yes. A child should not have to go through the pains and difficulties of a pregnancy. And any doctor can tell you that a 10 year old is too small to be able to handle that especially giving birth. And btw, as multiple women would be able to tell you. The “if the mother is in danger she can get an abortion” doesn’t stop complications from happening because the “danger” is only when the mother is about to die, danger happens before the literal brink of death.

7

Anonymous OP 1d

There are women who can never have children or are dead because they aren’t allowed to just walk in and get an abortion. And doctors aren’t allowed to say “oh this isn’t looking good you need an immediate abortion before this gets worse”. No the abortion can only happen when the woman is about to die. We have the medical technology to not get to that point, but nooo we can’t use it because “oh no woman and doctors are murderers and liars and love abortion”

8

Anonymous #1 1d

Pregnancy is traumatic for the body, no matter how much safer modern medicine has made it. To carry and pass a child through a smaller pelvis and birth canal is infinitely more painful. It puts much more burden on the child’s body and is far more deadly. It is scarring and horrifying. Children should ALWAYS have access to safe abortions, because no little girl deserves the trauma of such an early pregnancy.

6

Anonymous OP 1d

Unless you want to pay for medical costs, because that costs a lot of money here. Unless you want to pay for any food or bills. Then let a woman get an abortion. And just to be clear, women aren’t just getting abortions to “rid themselves of responsibility”. There are people who have had to get abortions because something was wrong with them or the baby that they would not be able to make it through labor. That they would only live for a few hours after birth.

5

Anonymous OP 1d

And those are people who actually wanted a baby. People who have picked out names, decorated a room, or planned a baby shower. But guess what laws that ban abortion like in Georgia and Texas cause the women who carry that baby to die or lose their ability to have another child entirely because they couldn’t get necessary care.

2

Anonymous OP 1d

And doesn’t really matter if you say “well in those cases the mom should get help immediately” because the people you’re voting for don’t care. They just want it gone entirely. They do not care if someone dies because of the law they just want the law to exist. And you continue to vote for them means you support that.

2

Anonymous #2 1d

if you really want to think about it the reason people have stopped dying from child birth as much isn’t just because of modern medicine. But because society was also realizing that children shouldn’t be having children.

8

Anonymous OP 1d

That’s a big part of it, absolutely. It’s sick that some people think children should be forced through pregnancy

5