Anonymous #1 1w

sybau lowkey

-8

Anonymous #2 1w

Please God

12

Anonymous #9 1w

Not to mention the death penalty always means wrongfully convicted people get killed

16

Anonymous #9 1w

Majority of victims don’t come forward regardless of if there’s the death penalty or not but ok

-3

No I genuinely think you are a freak with this take and it’s toeing the line of victim blaming

-2

Why would a more severe punishment stop rape victims from coming forward…

0

Anonymous OP 1w

I know, I am one goofy lmao. And huge part of the reason for that is narratives about “oh you’ll ruin his life, he has a bright future etc etc,” which a death penalty will also exacerbate. This retributive justice shit lets society pay itself on the back and feel good without actually doing anything to help victims. If people put the energy they do fantasizing about weird torture for hypothetical rapists into actually stopping and convicting real ones we would have made much more progress.

19

100% considering you keep putting the responsibility on the victim

-4

Idk how this is controversial you literally are 100% correct.

14

Anonymous OP 1w

He's not the one putting responsibility on the victim. Passing the death penalty is the one purring responsibility on the child

14

Anonymous OP 1w

They aren’t a freak lmao this is a common phenomenon among victims even without the death penalty given that most rapes are committed by friends and family. This isn’t even a theoretical, there’s many victims who don’t report because they feel guilty about the idea of their dad or cousin or friend or whatever going to jail. It’s not victim blaming to point out how society guilts victims into not reporting and this would make it worse

10

Anonymous #10 1w

Right like why the fuck are people downvoting this when it’s like a well established thing that already happens

9

Anonymous #9 1w

im one too “goofy”, and part of the reason it took me so long to come forward was because i didn’t think the punishment would do me justice. you would think the possibility of losing your life would thwart someone from committing the crime. and if it doesn’t you get what’s coming to you

-2

Putting them in jail for life does the same and doesn't force a child to decide if someone dies or not

14

It also means juries don’t convict at all because they don’t think someone deserves to die, wrongfully convicted people are murdered by the state, and crimes go unreported because victims don’t want to feel responsible for a death

1

I wonder why you keep putting the responsibility on the victim instead of the person who committed the crime. the victim puts no one to death, the perpetrator does it themselves. Get it through your head

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

If the child reports then death, if no report then no death. The child makes the decision for death. Sure the rapist puts themselves into that position but the final say or a life shoudl not be put onto a kid which this does.

6

Anonymous #10 1w

Hmm maybe the child rapists are responsible for their own fate

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

So that’s your story and I’m sorry that happened to you, it’s a shit club to be in. It doesn’t disprove anything I’ve said though, all of which is common and documented. Not to sound harsh but it’s actually deeply in unempathetic of you towards fellow victims to completely dismiss the fact that many straight up don’t report because they feel guilty and don’t want blood on their hands. Your experience is not universal. Nor is what I’m saying actually that controversial ual.

12

Death penalty is more expensive than holding someone in jail for life btw.

16

Anonymous OP 1w

They arnt responsibility for their own fate at the end of the day though. Idk why you don't understand that their live depends on if the child speaks up

8

It's not the death penalty that's expensive it's the courts and time holding them to death penalty. Wood chipper doesn't solve the problem that the costs associated to getting to that point is massive

7

Anonymous OP 1w

Pointing out that societal forces cause the victims to blame themselves isn’t victim blaming idk what you aren’t understanding 😭😭😭

3

Anonymous #9 1w

“The victim put them to death” think with brain

3

No it's an expensive system that is designed not to kill innocent people. The chemicals are a small cost in the grand scheme of the death penalty.

5

i can promise you that rape victims spend infinitely more time trying to navigate their own world changing, a victim is never responsible for the punishment their perpetrator receives. they don’t decide what the punishment is. Next

-1

Anonymous OP 1w

They literally do decide what the punishment is. They either choose if their rapist lives (don't report) or die (report). Explain why this is not true.

4

Anonymous #10 1w

Happy to educate you on how the justice system works. Victims don’t control sentencing. prosecutors decide whether to bring charges, judges or juries decide the outcome. Reporting a crime isn’t “choosing death,” it’s asking the legal system to investigate and act

0

Anonymous OP 1w

And yes that entire process depends on if the crime is reported or not. Sure a kid isn't the one sentencing the person but nothing happens until the kid speaks up. Ultimately meaning the entire process in which a death occurs falls on if the kid speaks up.

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Well if you want to discuss the justice system let me explain the Supreme Court to you. Go ahead and good Kennedy v Louisiana for me

6

Anonymous #10 1w

Framing it like that basically tells victims to stay quiet or be responsible for what happens next. Which is wrong and actively discourages people from reporting serious crimes

4

Anonymous og_beer 1w

Notice how that just further proves my point that children aren’t responsible for whether their rapist lives or dies

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Notice how it’s fucking UNCONSTITUTIONAL

7

a man who rapes his children should die

8

Or everyday cut a piece of his penis. Like Chinese death by 1000 cuts

5

Anonymous og_beer 1w

That quite literally supports the fact that victims aren’t responsible for deciding punishment. Thank you

0

Anonymous OP 1w

It literally does not. You’re still supporting unconstitutional laws

1

Anonymous og_beer 1w

Different topic btw

3

Anonymous OP 1w

Noticed you deleted the original reply. Not very American to be anti constitution

-1

Anonymous og_beer 1w

Got removed but nice try

1

Anonymous OP 1w

X to doubt

7

Anonymous og_beer 1w

🤡👋

1

Anonymous og_beer 1w

Happy to repost it just makes you look like a weirdo

-1

not to trauma dump or anything, but I’m an actual CSA victim & i don’t feel that way. we all feel differently. and while it might make sense to be like “let the kid choose what happens” they are kids… and they would likely feel immense internal & external pressure. i know i would at that age. my parents, aunts & uncles, grandparents all have an opinion. it just sounds awful. better to lock them up for life, it’s cheaper anyway.

29

Anonymous full.metal.everything. 1w

Yep, Furman v. Georgia, but also Coker v. Georgia. The latest is Kennedy v. Louisiana

12

Anonymous #14 1w

I need to read up on Kennedy v Lousiana, thanks for reminding me

4

Anonymous #13 1w

no disrespect to you but firing squad is much cheaper than life in prison

2

Anonymous #16 1w

Death penalty actually costs like 3+ times as much as life without parole. The trials, pre trials, and appeals etc are much more expensive.

7

Anonymous #9 1w

Cost has been a primary case for death penalty abolition for decades now

13