Anonymous #1 20h

It’s been in the news for years, Starbucks seems pretty anti-union. The argument is really whether a business can be forced to pay people to work even though they don’t want them to work

1

Anonymous enemyofmyenemy 20h

Thanks but I was asking OP for a source to support this particular claim. I don’t have any reason to think it’s false but It’s always good to have a source when you make a claim

2

Anonymous #1 20h

damn now I feel like an asshole

1

Anonymous enemyofmyenemy 20h

Ur good, I’ve posted plenty of knee jerk replies too. Always worth a second read to see what someone is actually asking for

1

Anonymous #1 20h

🥲

1

Anonymous enemyofmyenemy 20h

Ur good bro, ur not an asshole 🙏

3

Anonymous #1 20h

Bc OP dropped off the planet, I looked it up. This article from a month ago says that they’re closing 250 stores but only 20 of them are unionized. Union is pushing for Starbucks to transfer unionized employees to different stores but that’s all I could find

11

Anonymous #3 16h

Wait wtf I work at Starbucks and last week I heard about one of the stores in our district closing and I had no idea why… It sounded so random

1

Anonymous #4 16h

I mean, not always, right

1

Anonymous enemyofmyenemy 16h

Always

-2

Anonymous #3 16h

I also did hear that we’re getting more baristas at our location

1

Anonymous #4 5h

Sure, but you could say “Starbucks is bad for business and people” and it would still be true and yet it would be absurd to force it to not exist.

1

Anonymous #6 4h

Nobody's trying to force it not to exist. Fuck out of here with you strawman bullshit

1