Anonymous #1 9w

Sure Jan

1

Anonymous OP 9w

you dont remember a bunch of names on a long ass list, most of which were blacked out, and its how we found out about stephen hawking being on there??

7

Anonymous #2 9w

And either way, a federal judge in Florida ordered most of those documents unsealed in 2024. IIRC he said it was in the public’s interest

1

Anonymous #2 9w

“Doesn’t influence his DOJ” publicly stated he was disappointed in his AG for going slow on Trumps case.

1

Anonymous #1 9w

I do remember that, but if we consider that “releasing the Epstein files” then we should say the same for Trump doing essentially the same thing earlier this year by publishing the flight logs. What we wanted was confirmation on who had been “customers” of Epstein

1

Anonymous OP 9w

Can you show the context of that? I’m not aware of it

1

Anonymous OP 9w

His AG was notoriously apolitical from what I remember, almost to a fault tbh

1

Anonymous OP 9w

there is no customer list. there’s flight logs, contact sheets (which is most comparable to a customer list, since its who he’d contact for it) and then the thing we ACTUALLY want, which is a list of names of who’s in the blackmail videos engaging in CP

1

Anonymous #1 9w

and the people who were buying those videos

1

Anonymous #1 9w

“There’s no customer list just a list of people who were his customers” is what you just said FYI I don’t know if you meant that 💀 I know there’s not a literal list. But there are testimonies of people being implicated in abuse crimes of children, and those names are redacted, and could be redacted, but have to be by judges, who haven’t. Trump has already published flight logs and contact sheets, as I just said

1

Anonymous OP 9w

it wouldnt be called a customer list (since it doesnt guarantee they were customers, nothing would except video evidence) which is how theyre getting away with saying theres no customer list…

1

Anonymous #1 9w

If they were people that asked Epstein to traffic girls for them, and they paid. That would make them customers… either way I still said I don’t think it’s a list of customers that Epstein kept.

1

Anonymous OP 9w

how do you prove they did all that when they were just a number on a contact list

1

Anonymous OP 9w

Oh that was wayyyy after the fact lmao. Hindsight is always 20/20. I’m sure Garland would have pushed back anyway

1

Anonymous OP 9w

do u get what im saying? the FBI cant release a contact list, calling it a client list, without credible evidence they were involved in the sex trafficking

1

Anonymous #1 9w

Buddy are you a brick wall? I literally said what people want is are files from court cases where Epstein’s victims name individuals that abused them, the DOJ can publish these court documents, without redactions.

1

Anonymous OP 9w

again, there if there isnt evidence to back it up, the FBI cannot name names. what we want is someone to name the faces seen in the many many blackmail videos taken of the crimes themselves

1