Anonymous #4 15w

The law forbids it, depending on the distance lmao

1

Anonymous #1 15w

The law also forbids throwing bricks at people

2

Anonymous #1 15w

Nah the kid r dead he is good

-2

Anonymous #4 15w

Did I say it doesn’t?

1

Anonymous #4 15w

this post is about a priest possibly breaking the law and your only response is "b- bu- but the liberals!!!" because you have nothing to say when people you agree with break the law. whataboutism at it's finest

1

Anonymous #8 15w

Oh no I very much disagree with the priest. I’m pro choice completely. But what he’s doing is the right way to go about protesting

1

Anonymous #4 15w

if he's doing this within 100ft of an entrance door and 8ft of a person he's breaking the law, and you can't possibly know how he's conducting himself from a still image my point stands - bringing up liberals allegedly "throwing bricks at people" is whataboutism idc if you're pro or anti choice. your argumentation is intellectually dishonest and juvenile

1

Anonymous #8 15w

Your complain is Whataboutism. You’re trying to distract from the point I’m trying to make

1

Anonymous #4 15w

i already addressed your point bud

1

Anonymous #8 15w

What was my point then?

1

Anonymous #8 15w

And your response was based on making the assumption that this priest was being violent while supposedly celebrating mass?

1

Anonymous #4 15w

nobody said "violent" except you. you're the only one making assumptions. try again

1

Anonymous #4 15w

whataboutism AND straw manning? pick a struggle

1

Anonymous #8 15w

“You can’t possibly know how he’s conducting himself” it’s called reading between the lines, you’ve been through 5th grade language arts you know this stuff

1

Anonymous #4 15w

yes, i said you can't possibly know how he's conducting himself because you said it was "peacefully" and "the right way". there is a buffer zone law in colorado that prohibits people from protesting, counseling, etc. within 8ft of a person while within 100ft of an entrance to a clinic and this still image doesn't show whether or not he's been in that exact location - so i'm absolutely 100% correct... you can't possibly know. try again buddy

1

Anonymous #4 15w

you're the one assuming he was peaceful and doing it the "right way" lmao. not the other way around

1

Anonymous #8 15w

Well it’s very obvious that he’s not within 100 ft of a door to the building, so let’s get that out of the way. And yes, I’m making the assumption that a priest (who is in public and not with little kids that he can touch) is behaving in a peaceful manner. I feel like that’s a fairly reasonable assumption to make, and I would need evidence otherwise to move off of that opinion. Do you have any?

1

Anonymous #4 15w

it's not obvious. the left half of the building is cut off from the image and the right side of the building juts out. the left wing of this building - not shown - may very well be <100ft away. this is why i said a still image isn't evidence of anything and you can't possibly know. why on earth would he pose himself breaking the law? don't be foolish

1

Anonymous #8 15w

Ok you’re obviously trolling

1

Anonymous #4 15w

hey buddy if you wanna straw man, do whataboutism then act like a cropped image shows every detail i can't stop you. that's your own intellectual insufficiency to live with

1

Anonymous #4 15w

by this logic as long as those alleged brick throwing liberals had an image of them standing peacefully near their alleged targets with no bricks they'd be"peacefully" "doing it the right way"

1

Anonymous #8 15w

‘Well what if there’s a Harry Potter style entrance to the building hiding under the table and he’s currently blocking it? You ever think about that? 🤪’

1

Anonymous #8 15w

‘Yea he actually has a stack of bricks hidden under his robe that he’s about to throw at innocent pregnant women! You can’t tell me I’m wrong because you’re not there!’

1

Anonymous #4 15w

i'm saying the image is cropped. you have no clue where the entrance is, because there's a massive fence, but there is an "enter here" sign to the left right before where the image is cropped. no secret tunnels necessary - just a likely chance that there is an entrance nearby that's not being shown

1

Anonymous #4 15w

now you're just being bitter and childish lol

1

Anonymous #8 15w

You’re basically trying to convince me that there’s an entrance in the middle of the main road. I’m gonna guess that’s not the case

0

Anonymous #4 15w

why tf would it need to be in the middle of the road? that road is at most 20ft wide, plus 5 or so for the sidewalk. that leaves around 75ft beyond that fence where a door could be. you also don't know whether or not the cropped out part of the building is even flush with the road. for all you know there's a turn. my whole point is that you have exactly as much/little info as i do yet you're making bold assumptions that what he's doing is okay and that he hasn't moved from that spot

1