If you genuinely believe this dawg, your intelligence is entirely artificial because you only possess barely enough mental capacity to outsource cognitive tasks to grok.

8

it’s crazy how every single interaction you have on here is essentially a double-down or confirmation of you being a pedophile

5

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Don’t you think it’s actually way fucking worse though for it to comply with a request to make sexual imagery of a specific, real child than it is for it to generate some fictional child? Like you’re focusing so much on “owning” people with your basic knowledge of the terminology that you seem to be missing the big picture here

11

I had a hunch you’d bring this up. It’s genuinely an issue of how many CS majors are simultaneously this dense and morally reprehensible. I swear, half of y’all share a singular moral compass that consistently points towards humanity’s worst impulses.

9

And you’re out of brain cells. Quit while you’re ahead.

3

Comment Deleted

0

We do know what we’re saying, you’re just too dense to put it through your thick skull.

8

Comment Deleted

0

you want to talk about being out of your depth? Is that why you ignore images like this?

8

Comment Deleted

0

as a computer science major, shut the fuck up lmfaooo this illiterate moron is insane for trying that shit. what degree are you going to claim today? CS? or is it still neuroscience (yk, the “soft science” as you claimed)?

10

Comment Deleted

0

explain why you think advocating in favor for pedophilia is in any way acceptable?

7

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

lmfao now it’s EECS? so far the list is up to 3 (or is it 4?) majors you’ve claimed to study

11

you’re a genuine imbecile. the scholarly article I posted a picture of is the one cited in the first paragraph is this post, as I told you in one of your posts (which you entirely ignored and did not respond to).

9

and here we go, once again, with your desperate attempts at repackaging the same critiques you receive, and projecting them back onto the person who critiqued you. you need to get new tactics you moron

6

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #3 14h

of this article*** (not “is this post”)

5

Comment Deleted

0

you can’t even spell “regurgitation”? or are you too lazy to type the rest of the letters? either way, you’re still projecting like the desperate little shit you are, but hey

7

LMAO when it doubt, double down, right sunset? you’re a joke, and at this rate even your own neurons are giving up on you.

6

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

is it depressing to live a life where you’re (seemingly) incapable of creating your own unique thoughts, and instead must rely solely on the reuse and repackaging of the thoughts of others? one might even call it a deficiency of imagination. like how does that feel? personally, I wouldn’t wish that fate on my worst enemy.

9

Comment Deleted

0

me: *makes a joke about his neurons giving up on him* him: “give up” dude, it’s almost laughable at this rate. did you imprison your own consciousness or some shit because what is this autopilot you’re on?

8

poor wittle illiterate baby

3

Anonymous #3 13h

Like I said above, he’s literally incapable of handling cognitive tasks himself without grok at this point. And I don’t think it’s because of AI brainrot, he’s just always been this way.

8

Comment Deleted

0

Massive projection, but alright.

6

Anonymous #2 13h

yeah you’re 100% right. The more I interact with him, the more it’s confirmed for me. the dude is literally not capable of neither logical reasoning nor critical thinking. he’s willingly an encyclopedia of his favorite talking points, and that is it. a pedophile that solely memorizes talking points to advocate for pedophilia and his favorite pedophile president. he chose his path, he’ll deal with the consequences whether he likes it or not.

9

Comment Deleted

0

With regards to your deleted comment about the Mcat, I doubt you got a 525 But even if you did, the reason you keep bringing up test scores is because you’re insecure about the size of your wimpy pea brain and the limitations of your intellect relative to those of graduates from Tsinghua and other prestigious universities who you supposedly work with.

11

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #3 13h

That’s precisely it. And when he runs out of points, he goes right to Grok, because taking the time and effort to find another talking point on Fox News and Twitter tailored for his exact situation is just too much work for the three neurons firing out of sync in his skull.

5

Be quiet, adults are talking here. Not that you’d be interested, pedo.

7

Lmfao. Whatever you want to call it, you’re trying to dunk on people because you have like one Medium article on “What is Machine Learning?” worth of knowledge more than them. Does it make a difference to any user/victim of users of video gen models whether it’s able to generate CSAM because it’s in the training data (which it’s hard to say definitively that it’s not), because of in-context learning, because the model generalizes well and lacks guardrails, etc.?

11

Like you’re just being a dick to people and all you’re really saying is “you’re a dumbass if you think the models are trained on CP” which you can’t even fucking back up the claim that there’s no CP in the training data lmao

12