Anonymous #1 6d

Shut up Nazi

41

Anonymous OP 6d

Ironic

-14

Anonymous #1 6d

Shut up Nazi

38

Anonymous #1 6d

shut up nazi

26

Anonymous #1 6d

Most people aren’t accusing individual Israelis of genocide but instead their government, which has killed tens of thousands of people in Gaza ethnic-cleansing style. If I just said to an Israeli “you’re a genocider” that’s one dumb thing, but are you actually claiming that there is no genocide in Gaza?

17

Anonymous #4 6d

Didn’t make the first post I made this one to ragebait him

8

Anonymous OP 6d

(And also cause Israel is guilty of genocide)

16

Anonymous #3 6d

It’s less of a claim and more of a fact to be completely honest with you. Iran and Qatar have been rapidly spreading disinformation for years now, and for whatever reason a handful of Americans blindly believe all of it. Now it’s just a bunch of uneducated people calling Jewish people Nazis and it’s really sad tbh

-10

Anonymous #3 6d

History repeats itself over and over again and people just never learn from it

-9

Anonymous #1 6d

So are all the dead people just… not dead or something?

19

Anonymous #3 6d

There’s a massive difference between casualties and genocide. Genocide actually means something specific and it doesn’t apply here

-7

Anonymous #1 6d

Also are you seriously saying that even the UN is believing Iranian and Qatari misinformation instead of listening to their humanitarian people currently in Gaza?

16

Anonymous #1 6d

What is the difference?

15

Anonymous #1 6d

Do you realize your lies will never turn anyone towards Israel, but will turn more people against them. Keep doing our job for us dumbass.

14

Anonymous #3 6d

Genocide is acting to deliberately wipe out an entire group of people. Killing terrorists with an unfortunate amount of civilian casualties does not meet that criteria

-5

Anonymous OP 6d

I’ve actually helped a lot of people irl understand the truth that’s going on in the Middle East and changed a lot of people’s opinions. I know it’s harder on the internet because people are more stubborn and often just trolls, but I rest easy at night knowing I’m making a difference

-7

Anonymous #1 6d

Israel has blatantly said they aren’t interested in killing only terrorists though

17

Anonymous #3 6d

First of all, the guardian is generally not a very credible source. Second of all, you just quoted an individual person that is no longer a part of the Israeli government and claimed “Israel said”

-4

Anonymous #1 6d

I’ve managed to educate a lot of people and turn them against Israel so I’m glad I get to sleep at night knowing I canceled your lies out

7

Anonymous OP 6d

I bet you have 😉

-3

Anonymous #1 6d

It was a recording of him while he was actively a part of the Israeli government. What do you consider to be reliable sources when it comes to what is happening in the Middle East right now?

10

Anonymous #3 6d

Honestly it’s very hard to pick 1 reliable source. Every source has some sort of bias, whether it be pro-Israel or pro-Palestine. I tend to try to read several sources from both sides and piece things together on my own to get a holistic view. But I would say the ones to definitely never look at are guardian, Al Jazeera, BBC, anything on social media

1

Anonymous #1 6d

So what sources have you used to convince all those irl people you mentioned?

2

Anonymous #3 6d

Generally I think the New York Times, CNN, or Washington post are decent

1

Anonymous #1 6d

Could you please share some examples from those sources that demonstrate the lack of a genocide taking place in Gaza?

7

Anonymous #3 6d

I mean when I’m having a casual conversation with someone I’m not usually showing them links lmao. I generally provide context and history, and remind them of the biases of the sources and statistic that they get their info from

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

And that… convinces them?

6

Anonymous #3 6d

It’s pretty easy 😭 most people that are super anti Israel just have 0 knowledge of the situation and are just parroting things they saw on tiktok. All it takes is a little bit of reason and knowledge to make them understand

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

“Can you share some examples” “No I usually don’t have to provide sources to back up my information.” It’s giving JD “I was told you wouldn’t be fact checking” Vance

13

Anonymous perry_theplatypus 6d

I gave 3 examples…

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

Yes 3 examples of news outlets, sure. #3 asked for actual sources, articles, something that supports your position. You say it’s there, so it shouldn’t be too hard to supply it

14

Anonymous #1 6d

You shared three news sources you like but didn’t provide any substantial sources backing up the claim that Israel isn’t committing a genocide. Telling people “well it can’t be happening because you can’t trust what any of these sources are reporting” convinces nobody and just makes you sound like someone who refuses to acknowledge facts you don’t agree with

9

Anonymous #3 6d

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/22/opinion/no-israel-is-not-committing-genocide-in-gaza.html

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

Nobody asked for examples of news outlets, people asked for SOURCES of your information. The information that informs YOUR view.

8

Anonymous #1 6d

That’s an opinion piece

9

Anonymous #1 6d

You probably:

14

Anonymous #3 6d

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/01/12/israel-gaza-hamas-genocide-netanyahu-response/

-2

Anonymous #1 6d

Yes, because Netanyahu famously remains neutral.

16

Anonymous #1 6d

This link doesn’t connect to an article

10

Anonymous #3 6d

Ofc it’s an opinion piece. Everyone deciding whether it’s a genocide or not is stating an opinion. If you read the opinion piece you’ll see the facts that they use to justify their opinion

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

Wdym?

-1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6d

Did you just read the words in the link and assume you know what the entire article is about 😭 classic

-1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 6d

This shits like citing Hitler to “disprove the holocaust” 💀

11

Anonymous #1 6d

Interestingly the author of the opinion piece, Bret Stephens, received backlash in 2016 for saying that antisemitism was "the disease of the Arab mind.” He also was accused of being a eugenicist when he argued that Ashkenazi Jews are superior because they have a history of “using alternative thinking”

11

Anonymous #1 6d

I’m just trying to “remind them of the biases of the sources and statistic that they get their info from”

5

Anonymous #8 6d

Are you saying Fareed Zakaria is Hitler?

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

When I opened the second link it just opened up the website for the news, it didn’t bring me to an article

3

Anonymous #3 6d

I appreciate that you’re taking the time to look in depth about the source and identify their biases. Always do that, everyone has a bias. I just found the first 2 articles that came up because you asked for an article from those sources that disagrees with the idea that Israel is committing genocide.

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

Hmm weird. Idk here it is again https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/01/12/israel-gaza-hamas-genocide-netanyahu-response/

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

I asked for sources that prove Israel isn’t committing a genocide. A fluff opinion piece means about as much as your texts do. I’d be debating in bad faith if I didn’t take the time to interact with the sources of the person I’m debating with. I still can’t access the second article :/ what’s the title, author, source and date? I’ll try and find it myself

14

Anonymous #3 6d

The next time some event happens and you see the guardian release a headline that says “evil jewish Nazis keep committing genocide” I challenge you to find an article about the same event from the other side. You’ll likely learn more context that the first article didn’t provide

-2

Anonymous #3 6d

Washington post, Fareed Zakaria, Jan 12th

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

Again yes it’s an opinion piece because what you asked me for is an opinion.

0

Anonymous #1 6d

Okay but when I look it up even CNN reported on the “50 gazans for every Jew” thing so

5

Anonymous #1 6d

I thought you said Israel not committing a genocide was less of an opinion and more of a fact tho

3

Anonymous #3 6d

You’re still quoting a single person who is no longer in a position of power because he resigned years ago 😭

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

Yea honestly you’re right it really is a fact

-1

Anonymous #1 6d

I’m not quoting anybody other than you? Why are you citing opinion pieces of what you’re saying is a fact?

4

Anonymous #1 6d

So remind me why Israel has a history of strategically displacing and massacring Arabs in occupied territories and replacing them with Jewish settlers and how that’s not ethnic cleansing? And this isn’t just civilians being displaced by war. Specifically expelling Arabs. The Druze were left in the Golan heights while their Arab neighbors were expelled. Arab villages were massacred in 1948. Many Arabs STILL WITHIN Israel are not allowed to return to their villages.

9

Anonymous #9 6d

Like come on, this is the government actively committing ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, whose officials have openly claimed all Gazans must be punished for Hamas, and whose soldiers have actually reported they were ordered to shoot at civilians. Are the mass civilian casualties just a coincidence?

8

Anonymous #9 6d

Probably the most common circumstance for genocide to occur is during warfare. When rebels are able to hide among a civilian population, a government commonly decides to just eradicate the whole civilian population. The heat of war is also a much easier circumstance to convince soldiers to commit a genocide, more so than during a time of peace. Turkey claims to this day that the Armenian genocide was simply a government relocation to prevent Armenian rebels from genociding Turks.

8

Anonymous #9 6d

Germany committed the Nama and Herero genocide (one recognized by Israel) in response to indigenous Namibians massacring 200 German settlers. The Nama and Herero were pushed to the desert and starved. Then all the men were executed as rebels. Then the women and children were placed in concentration camps.

7