have you factored in that a lower cost of living means people need less wages to meet their needs? have you considered that taxes don't need to be levied against everybody equally? what if taxes are only raised on the highest earners - people likely benefiting from the inaccessibility and inaffordability of groceries?
basically "they *might* respond in harmful ways and we should back down and continue letting them hoard resources and leave people hungry and food insecure rather than addressing the retaliatory response"? you didn't answer all of my questions either. are you gonna keep tap dancing like a good boy or actually commit to your position?
they can afford to move... where? when? how? "where" being the most important because sure they could set up in the middle of nowhere for cheaper but that doesn't mean they'll hit their profit targets. you make a lot of willy nilly assumptions and don't seem to have anything but vibes to back it
tax credits elsewhere won't necessarily be better for their margins than operating where they're at now. that's why they hire financial professionals - to determine these things. your (over)confidence led me to assume you might have specifics but clearly this is just a vibes based position and the most basic questioning of it has spurred on a juvenile-rage fueled lash out. you're clearly not equipped for the conversation kid