Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
“Maybe discriminating against people for things they largely can’t control is actually good”
14 upvotes, 60 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "“Maybe discriminating against people for things they largely can’t control is actually good”"
This post is unavailable
upvote 14 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

I mean the only reason you would be fat is if you have a medical condition or just let yourself go

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

LARGELY can’t control 😭

upvote 2 downvote
💤
Anonymous 8w

you absolutely can control your body weight

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> pinksleepygirl 8w

Not everyone can. You are one of the people who are advocating to discriminate against a group of people for how they exist/look. There are plenty of groups who’ve done the same; and I doubt you can honestly say, any of them were good.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 8w

And how do you know who does and does not have those conditions?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

I think there are a lot of valid reasons why people would “let themselves go” I don’t think the appropriate response following that, would be to shame them.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

No not shaming but encouraging them to work on themselves. There is no good reason to put your body in that much stress if it is an emotional thing, that doesn’t help your situation.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

So you’d rather create a social situation where strangers get to dictate how people deal with emotional issues and how they should treat themselves if they reach a certain weight we arbitrarily decide is “too much”

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Nobody’s dictating anything. I’m just saying it’s good to encourage people who are in that lifestyle because it’s harmful overtime and keeps people from enjoying some of the many aspects of life. I don’t mean to up to a fat person and ask innapropriate personal questions but get to the know the person and see how you can encourage better fitness. If you truly care about someone, you want to see them in their best self

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

You’re already deciding what the “only reasons” for being fat are. It seems impossible to attempt to create a cultural response without dictating arbitrary lines

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

What other reasons would there be besides a medical situation or voluntary due to a number of things?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Mental health? What’s an acceptable reason to be fat, to you?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Mental health was covered in the second reason, “voluntary due to a number of things”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

If you have a medical condition, you obviously could not have controlled that. My own sibling has a thyroid problem which makes it hard for him.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Is it reasonable to be fat to you, due to financial issues, mental health issues, etc

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Even in a mental health crisis, it was still your decision to cope or to act in a way that would lead to being overweight

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Regardless of whether or not you could afford decent food versus fast food, there was always the option of keeping active in either situation.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Is it, yes or no?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

I answered your question already

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

I didn’t actually see you say if you thought it was reasonable, I see you say what you think people’s capacities to stay fit are. But you don’t answer if you do or don’t think it’s reasonable after the last question asked.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

A “no” is the simplified version to my comments

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Great. In mental health crisis’ like depression, sometimes people cannot sustain themselves properly. The brain literally does not let them. This doesn’t just go for eating, but sleeping and drinking water too. (Among other things) Do you still think it was “their decision” at that point?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Do they have the opportunity to seek help?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

That’s not an answer to the question I asked. I’ve given you a premise that not only is scientifically backed, but contests a claim you made. I’m being genuine here. So please answer. You didn’t qualify that in your last comment.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

It’s a clarification question. Does the individual in your circumstance have the opportunity to seek any kind of help that would allow them to retain or develop their physical health?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

It shouldn’t matter because you’re claiming them to have a choice in how they cope. Their brain does not present an option.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

It does matter because if the individual has the opportunity to seek help of any kind, the ability to decide on that is still allotted to the person. Change has to come from a willingness to change, but if you say the individual has lost their faculty to make decisions such as talking to someone or seeking help then how would recovery be possible?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Again, your own claim is how they “choose” if your brain removes the capacity to make decisions like eat or sleep consistently, then it calls into question your claim. Do you?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Is there an illness that does that and what is the normal procedure for it?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

You’re not answering.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

I need to know if such an illness exists and if the procedures in terms of taking care of people with it would allow for the circumstance in which someone becomes overweight and is still abled and allowed to frequent public areas where someone would be inconvenienced.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

That’s not an answer. I’m contesting a direct claim. You should be able to answer, given the premise I’ve provided.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

It’s not an answer, it’s a request for clarification. You say someone with certain illnesses would be unable to make decisions. I’m asking if such an illness exists, and its procedures would still allow for the individual to frequent an area where someone would be inconvenienced. The whole sentiment is on people disliking being inconvenienced because of the overbearing physical health of someone else. If you have an illness where you can’t eat or drink on your own it would be reasonable to

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

assume that you would be under some kind of surveillance or with personal aids, or possibly kept in an area to recover, which nullifies any chance of inconveniencing someone.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

I’m telling you it does. You’ve already been given that information. I find it hard to believe that even if this was a hypothetical you’d be unable to answer.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

All you said was “what if this person cannot actually make those decisions” not “x is an illness in which this decision cannot be made and could result in the individual becoming overweight”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

not what I said. Again the hypothetical if it were one, which it is not, scientifically, should not impact your answer

post
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

How does someone with that severity recover? If this person is on their journey to recover that’s fine to me for them to be overweight in the moment.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Non sequitur. Answer. Ive been so patient. You’re now being told that the condition in question IS real, and you said you couldn’t answer if you didn’t know that. I’ll answer you once you answer me.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

If they can’t decide for themselves it really wouldn’t be up to them, but how would you recover unless you could make the decision of taking some form of action or steps to better health? I’ve already implied previously where it would be understandable in the mental health context. The whole purpose of my asking the questions is because if a person is dealing with these crisis but has no interest in seeking help they prolong their suffering. And as I said this all stems from people who didn’t

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Actually no. You had made a claim that even with mental health issues, people can still “choose” was the phrasing you used.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

like to be inconvenienced by people who were overweight, and I’m also saying that if this person can’t decide to recover or have any of these issues then would they even have the opportunity to unintentionally inconvenience someone because in all honesty if you can’t drink or eat or make decisions on your own you need people to aid you

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Choose as in choose to seek help, or some kind of action where they would be going in for people to meet their mental and physical health needs. Are you saying people with that illness would not be able to choose to seek help?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Do you think people who don’t have the capacity to sleep or eat consistently have the capacity to do harder tasks?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

What do you mean by harder tasks?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

what confuses you about what I said?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Well what would doing or not doing hard tasks have to do in this context?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

In the context of having depression?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Clinically diagnosed depression?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

I’m sure you could still do a lot, including seeking help. As long as they’re taking the necessary steps to work on themselves they’re fine

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

You could still do a lot, according to?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Are you saying people with clinically diagnosed depression are unable to seek help?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

According to? Why do you continue to avoid simple questions? It’s disingenuous that you’re reading these questions, processing them, and then making the conscious effort to avoid them.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

When you have the “I’m sure” it is very clearly an opinion piece and not a sourced statement. That’s there because I was under the impression that you were under the impression that I was saying people with clinically diagnosed depression were incapable of doing anything at all, which I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that they can do some things. Are you trying to say something else?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

An opinion can be baseless. It can also be rooted in fact. That’s why the “according to” portion. Which is what you’d call a clarification.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Perhaps we are not finding each other

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

Well, I did specify the purpose of the phrase

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

So just to be clear then. Rooted in nothing. That’s a baseless opinion.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 8w

I already told you what it was, please do try to understand the context I provided

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 8w

Clarify for me then. That’s my understanding.

upvote 1 downvote