Now you guys like shooting stats? But when the 13% commits 43% of violent crimes it’s just “socioeconomic factors”
-7
Anonymous#26d
the 13/50 statistic has been proven false, its arrested, not convicted of crime, because the police presence in predominantly black communities is higher than that of predominantly white communities. it’s a dog whistle used by racists
18
Anonymous#56d
So socioeconomic factors? 🤣
-5
Anonymous#26d
The point really just flew right over your head
12
Anonymous#66d
Did it? Cope or not, all roads lead to Rome.
-2
Anonymous#26d
I mean yeah it quite literally did when you ignore the fact that your claim was debunked 😂
4
Anonymous#66d
Debunked or excused?
-2
Anonymous#26d
Debunked
12
Anonymous#46d
💥
16
Anonymous#76d
Trans people are about 1% of the population, which is more than the 0.3% of shooters
10
Anonymous#96d
How many shooters is 0.3%
3
Anonymous#76d
this is 0.3%
2
Anonymous#56d
I assume 1500 is a sample, unless that’s literally all the mass shootings. Either way, what is the size of the population that is being used for the 1%
2
Anonymous#76d
1% of the american population being trans comes out to 2.8 million people out of 330 million
9
Anonymous#105d
1% of people are trans. .3% of trans are shooters. That means they’re less likely to be shooters
2
Anonymous#115d
Ur telling almost 1/3 of trans people are shooters
-2
Anonymous#105d
they said it backwards. 1% of people are trans. 0.3% of shooters are trans. there are little 3ish trans shooters ever.
2
Anonymous#125d
Not people in the comments trying to justify it by making it sound like this is somehow a large percentage of the transgender population when in reality it’s even lower lmao