US Politics on Yik Yak | No they did not. They have ruled that federal Judges do not have the jurisdiction to block the President. The Supreme Court still has the power to overturn anything non constitutional.

Yik Yak

Download

Join communities on Yik Yak Download

US Politics 12w

No they did not. They have ruled that federal Judges do not have the jurisdiction to block the President. The Supreme Court still has the power to overturn anything non constitutional.

US Politics 12w

As of today, the Supreme Court has given Trump the power to write basically any executive order, and there’s nothing anybody can do about it.

🐋

Anonymous 12w

And here I thought republicans opposed unchecked central power. Now states have less power than ever while he says a newborn baby is illegal

Anonymous 12w

Lmfao like SCOTUS would actually do that against trump

Anonymous 12w

The Supreme Court refuses to do anything against Trump. It’s the same votes every time. It’s a horrible ruling and you know it. Pretends the majority was democrats, and the president was AOC, and think about how you would feel about this ruling. What OP claimed is true in practice, even if it isn’t technically true on paper.

Anonymous

#1 12w

Literally

Anonymous

#1 12w

You mean like here?

Anonymous

dawn_whale68 12w

States don’t have the power to overturn the federal government

-2

🐋

Anonymous

OP 12w

State courts did, at least a little

Anonymous

OP 12w

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 24A931

Anonymous

dawn_whale68 12w

No they didn’t. The constitution is quite clear. If state law and federal law are in conflict the federal law is the one that will be enforced. The president is checked by the Supreme Court, there is no provision for granting power over the president to any other court.

-2

Anonymous

#4 12w

I have already cited a case under this post where the Supreme Court ruled against trump. I cited the case number for you.

-1

Anonymous

OP 12w

You do realize this is literally the purpose of the federal courts right? So now what happens is, when Trump blatantly violates the constitution you have to individually sue. And because injunctions are banned; that means it will take literally years for anything to be resolved in the courts. In the meantime, they can just keep violating the law. And if your case is eventually resolved, that only helps you, they can still keep doing it to literally any other person.

Anonymous

#5 12w

this is effectively our equivalent to the Enabling Acts of 1933, which made Hitler’s position of Chancellor into a dictatorial one. with this ruling, Trump can literally do anything he wants, he can effectively make legislation by himself because there is no way to stop him in a timely manner. the 6 justices that made this ruling are guilty of treason.

Anonymous

#5 12w

Federal courts have never had the power to overturn the executive. National injunctions were used 11 times before trump came into office. It’s a political move, and a blatant overstep of the federal judiciary

Anonymous

OP 12w

the president doesn’t dictate state law you idiot. and no, the federal courts absolutely have the right to enforce the constitution. just say you’re a neo nazi.

Anonymous

#5 12w

Are you insane? No it is not. Trunk has 4 years of this term. the SCOTUS can overturn him. Congress can impeach him. Sit down.

Anonymous

OP 12w

ah yes a ruling where they said “you shouldn’t do this but we won’t make you stop” what a great example.

Anonymous

#5 12w

The federal courts lost the ability to issue national injunctions. They can still issue injunctions over their federal district