Anonymous #1 1w

What specifically are Korean men experiencing ? They’re not having sex ?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Men are not entitled to sex.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s more than sex it’s about being unable to get into relationships and being unable to have kids but usually those two things involve sex with a woman.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Right. And men aren’t entitled to relationships, kids, or sex.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

If women are saying “hey we don’t want relationships, kids, or sex rn” men aren’t losing rights. Women are just asserting themselves.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Yeah three things that men need to be fulfilled in life so don’t be surprised when by threatening that aspect of masculinity you start to so a generation of men increasing hostile to the woke agenda that’s trying to push them out

1

Anonymous OP 1w

saying they’re weak for sensing the shifting tide underneath their feat is demeaning and short sighted

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Men don’t need women for any of those things. They can adopt kids and raise them together in a community. Meaningful relationships, like friendships, will blossom with other men. And you always can take care of your own business. I’m not saying they’re weak, I’m saying they’re not entitled to anything from women - whether that be sex, relationships, or children. No one is entitled to anything from another person.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

There also isn’t a solution to this that “the left” is magically keeping hidden. Women in Korea don’t want sex, relationships, or kids. They shouldn’t be forced into ANYTHING.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Women are saying “I don’t feel safe having sex, relationships, and children, and I won’t until something changes.” The only thing left is for something to change. They’re taking a stance.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

that’s sort of a dilemma, men aren’t entitled to have relationships but they still need them. Also Adopting kids still requires a woman to birth them and heaven forbid most men desire a tradition marriage structure

1

Anonymous OP 1w

They don’t feel safe or they don’t want to be tied down

1

Anonymous OP 1w

The solution is pushing less feminist girl boss bs and restoring the legal institution of marriage to it’s former status in our society which the left is gate keeping

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Less feminism? Do you think women are lesser than men?

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No but they’re being elevated above men

1

Anonymous #1 1w

No, they’re not. They’re just allowed to accept or decline relationships now. Feminism is the belief that both sexes are equal.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

If people aren’t having families, it’s because the political and economic climate isn’t right for it.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Although previous generations of feminism held to such a simple view the current iteration seems to be women’s privileges without men’s responsibilities

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Elaborate.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

No fault divorce, Men are still expected to provide, Men are still expected to initiate, Men are still expected to look a certain by most woman (a lot of data suggest women are pickier

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Women on the other hand cannot be discriminated on based off their appearance (or your fat phobic), Women can have whatever body count they like (or your insecure), Women are usually favored in divorce cases (she’s going to get the kid’s and property, and women are often encouraged to forward themselves financially without being expected to even tell their partner

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Husbands died constantly before no fault divorce as their wives poisoned them, both men and women work, and both men and women are judged by beauty quite a lot. there’s not really anything to do about it. Yeah it sucks. beauty standards suck. You don’t get to control how you look. But the left doesn’t establish or set beauty standards.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Women are judged by beauty, body count, etc. too, just like men. the court does favor the mother, yes. I can’t do anything about that but it sucks for dads who lose custody.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Women are expected and told to forward themselves financially as an escape option. Just in case something happens. It’s why engagement rings were so valuable. Women couldn’t have credit cards in the past, so they had one thing they could pawn to escape abusive partners.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

right and men are told to put everything on the line for their partner so she can cheat and leave him high and dry. Do you see the double standard we are treating women as victims 24/7 because of conditions that no longer exist.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Meanwhile, women are still being murdered, groomed, raped, assaulted, sold into child marriage, sold into sex slavery by men. Until that’s 100% gone, I don’t want to hear you talk about how women are perceived as above men.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Because no woman faces hardships anymore? There’s no more rape or assault or trafficking right?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Abuse is horrible but it goes both ways and we are seeing an uptick in the mistreatment of men because of Feminism and fewer people in the dating pool because eof lgbtq+

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Right but the majority of abuse is directed at women by men. Because of sexism. Also, women make on average less money than men. Sexism still affects women today, in 2025. It’s not just gone.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

The difference is all of that stuff is illegal the people doing those things are shunned by society hence the me too movement right. I’m not talking about stuff that happens outside the system I’m talking about how society treats men and treats women and the reality is men are getting the shorter end of the stick.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Women get paid less money. For doing the same jobs. And a man with multiple rape and assault accusations is President.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

There has also not been a single female president. That is because of sexism.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

If your theory were true, women would be getting paid more than men. But there’s still a wage gap, women are getting paid less. I don’t know what more evidence you need of sexism.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

If they were actually paid less they would hired more (companies like cheap labor above all else) and having a woman president is an extremely arbitrary piece of evidence to try to use in order to display sexism. Plus Two woman have run for president and almost won too.(Khamala was literally vice president)

1

Anonymous #1 1w

In 2024, the wage gap was 15 cents per dollar. Women are factually paid less.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Could that have anything to do with billionaires and the top 1% being all male meaning and could it be true that those stats have nothing to do with the rest of the population.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

That’s also an indicator of sexism. We’re making the same point here. Women, on average, have less money than men - particularly pertaining to wage gaps, but also because there are more men in the top 1%.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

So society doesn’t benefit women because the people at the top who are removed from society aren’t women.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I’m not claiming that the top 1% overly represents women I’m saying the rest of society doesn’t. In areas such as divorce law.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

You want to get rid of no fault divorce right ?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

No. But your claim is that sexism is gone. Over. Kaput. I’m saying that women and men are raised and educated differently due to sexism, which causes them to go for what they think they deserve. If there was no sexism, wealth would be distributed evenly amongst men and women, and there would be no wage gap. There are still sexist people and countries and places on the planet. You might not be sexist, but other people still are.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Divorce needs a rework

1

Anonymous OP 1w

and I’m not claiming sexism is gone it never will be but currently that equation favors woman in the middle and lower classes in America (which is like 90% of people)

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Hey, so sorry if I’m just repeating what OP has said, but you can’t just blame women if men aren’t starting families. Also, not everyone wants to start a family, and not starting a family doesn’t make a person less masculine.

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

SO men want families with women that don’t want families, and when I say this isn’t good and women should be encouraged to have families you say I’m blaming women for men’s failures to start families. 😅

1

Anonymous #1 1w

I’m saying women should have a choice in the matter.

2

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

No one’s saying they should they can’t just go back to being slaves I clarified that earlier

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Dig deep and think about it for a bit. What are some possible reasons WHY a woman might not want to start a family? Try to put yourself in other people’s shoes, it can really help with empathetic difficulties.

3

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 1w

she wants to remain sexually and financially free. not that hard to understand what Imm saying is this is bad for society (i.e. unsustainable birthrates)

1

Anonymous #1 1w

oooh and depressed men but no one cares about that

1

Anonymous #1 1w

The fact that you think that says a lot about you. Men shouldn’t *need* sexual gratification from women to not be depressed. That’s a sign of deeper underlying issues.

2