
1) agree 2) agree 3) abolished; it’s basically modern day slave catchers. 4) fuck yeah 5) not enough trans athletes, just have co-ed leagues and be better at understanding science knowing trans men are men and can compete in men’s sports with no problems. same goes for women, which gets much more of an uproar due to the patriarchy lol. 5) yes 6) *if you want because freedom of religion! ❤️
Economically at least illegal immigration has ALWAYS been harmful to American workers going as far back as the gilded age. Driving wages down, scabbing during union strikes, etc etc. The inhumane treatment of immigrants is immoral and fascistic, but also immigrants cause a real problem for uneducated American laborers. Flooding the job market with uneducated migrants who will work for slave wages forces lower class Americans to get college degrees even though most can’t afford them.
It’s not about crime. It’s about economics and protecting our workers. I have plenty of sympathy for refugees and absolutely not grudge against immigrants (my grandfathers on both sides fled WW2) but at the end of the day illegal immigration is a huge strain on the already precarious situation of uneducated American laborers.
I can absolutely equate the two. Both segregation between white and black people and this case separate a minority group into something that on its surface is equivalent- but in practice not equivalent at all. Do you expect the career prospects, reputation of, and prestige of a sports league specifically for trans people to be the same as the regular organization’s? When trans people are a fraction of a fraction of athletes? Consider the problems women’s sports have and make them 10x worse.
Ultimately, this stinks of “I’m fine with *those people* but why can’t they exist away from me?” There is no benefit to this, numerous downsides, and frankly seems downright transphobic. Do you expect the local high school to what, make a team for the one trans kid in the entire region that wants to play soccer?
Excuse me for my ignorance on the topic. But for professional sport like the olympics (idk if that’s even allowed but just an example) i feel having a trans woman competing with cis women could be slightly unfair because of the biological advantage that the trans woman would have. I don’t think transgender people should be excluded from sports but professional sports like the olympics where people do it for a living seems a little unfair. I also don’t think that trans people should be excluded
With proper testing, I don’t think it matters too much. Also, imo sports is all about having unfair biological advantages. Obviously you can’t be a trans woman on zero hormone therapy competing in women’s sports, but I think of all the women with PCOS who have an unfair biological advantage in that regard. Michael Phelps is another example of an athlete with a biological advantage. Trans women athletes also aren’t out there crushing the competition in most cases
Of course! And yeah I think the athletes throwing a tantrum over it (Riley Gaines comes to mind) just need to do better, to be blunt. I don’t think she even finished in the top 3 in that race against Leah Thomas. There were multiple cis women athletes who did better than Riley and Leah. I think she’s a sore loser
That’s a fair point, I was more so referring to professional sports. TBH I personally think it’s important to protect the rights and liberties of trans citizens but when it comes to professional sports I genuinely just don’t see what wrong with the having their own categories/leagues. I mean I guess it’s all up to the individual business incentives for said leagues but idk it seems like a pretty obvious solution
“In a perfect world” ok, but like, these are steps the government could take and just isn’t. We are arguing about the steps the government should take. They should take these steps. And for your last sentence- If the only objection to undocumented immigration is economic and not moral- and is within the power of the government to solve, as you have basically admitted in this comment- then they should take the moral route and deal with the economic implications.
Please enlighten me about these recent studies. In my mind all of this comes from some elitist academic notion that poor whites see themselves as too “good” for menial jobs no matter how good the pay. These same people ignore all their own hotel cleaners, janitors, construction workers, baristas, and more who have all had to compete with people who will do more work for less money because they’re more desperate
God dammit, I keep trying to forget Gaines’ name. Then I keep getting reminded. I don’t want to remember her name, she doesn’t deserve it. She came to my undergrad to spew her bullshit, we did a peaceful protest, she pretended someone hit her and waited until midnight so she could get walked out by the police for the optics so she could grift on social media. (We didn’t want to leave until she did.)
Oh, the drink spilling was on purpose, as far as I can tell. Which, kinda based. We also had some preachers show up at different times to stand on the grass and tell us we were going to hell. Nothing will ever surpass a preacher yelling at a crowd “how many of you watch PARHNAGRAHPHEE!?!?!” to loud cheering. He hated Cardi B for some reason. Spider-Man was there. It was crazy.
Yes this article discusses how immigration increases GDP and tax revenue but NOWHERE does it mention wages or low-skill labor markets. While immigration might be great for American BUSINESSES because it give them cheap labor it does not quote one source or even claim that immigration is good for American WORKERS. All the empirical data suggests that illegal immigraton is a net loss for America’s poor and uneducated work force.
I totally get that you seem to be a reasonable person. But at the same time, you are expressing this at a time we are seeing the government try to take away the rights of trans people like never before. There’s no practical reason for this separation, and a lot of people that will argue for it are the same people that will argue trans people should be “separate but equal” everywhere else that might be gender segregated. And that’s not great. So people are going to react.
And honestly, I still don’t get why you want to separate trans people. You haven’t been talking about athletic performance. You haven’t been repeating the conservative fearmongering about locker rooms or w/e. Which means that the only remaining possible issue is you don’t see them as “really women” or “really men”, which- trans women are women and trans men are men, and please, learn more on this one before talking about it. But if that’s not it, then I really don’t know.
Totally understand. To be honest the only two trans friends I have really don’t care and when we talk about it they seem indifferent and like they don’t really have a counterpoint but maybe I’m just dominating the conversation. I’m not purposefully trying to repeat right-wing propaganda and I don’t “want” to be separate from trans people it just seems like a valid compromise that would put the issue to bed.
I get that you like the idea of a compromise, but when the compromise is “you are excluded from this area”, I don’t think a lot of people are going to be happy with that. In practice, it’s just a softer kind of ban. There will never be enough trans athletes to set up a team, much less a league. There’s no valid reasons to form the league in the first place, either- so why should it be formed? To protect the feelings of certain people?