Anonymous #6 4w

what's secure about it?

1

so like if we ban guns the country is safer because fewer guns?

1

i never asked about the promise. i asked what's secure about the border. you said fewer crossings, so i asked if that logic applies to guns. if we were as strict as we are on mexicans with guns would the country be safer?

1

ban and confiscate are actually different words my friend. nobody said confiscate. not to mention the same logic would apply to people twofold. it's certainly not easier to round up millions of people than inanimate objects owned mostly by unfit diabetics (again, not what i'm talking about) now are you gonna answer or just ballerina around the question? if we were as strict as we are on mexicans with guns would the country be safer?

1

last chance to answer my question and not the question of whatever shadow figure is whispering in your ear: if we were as strict as we are on mexicans with guns would the country be safer?

1

last chance like i'm not gonna keep engaging with somebody who's too conversationally challenged to engage in a basic back-and-forth and answer straightforward questions. you were straight up answering ghost questions

1

anyway... so banning/limiting the flow of something doesn't magically prevent bad actors from taking advantage of it? so you're telling me... correct me if i'm wrong... bad guys can still get guns but probably not the good guys?

1

that makes me wonder 🤔 has the flow of drugs northward stopped? what about stolen goods? in fact do we even have evidence that human trafficking has slowed?

1

then i ask again, what is secure? if you have no evidence this has had any impact on drug flows, gun flows, human trafficking, dangerous crimes, etc. why do you assume it's more secure? what is your metric for security?

1