
blue_brightly
@ people from blue states that lump everyone in red states together and think we all vote conservative“Haha all the poors in red states losing benefits getting exactly what they voted for!” YOU BUFFOON POORS ON SNAP ARE NOT VOTING BECAUSE THEIR EMPLOYERS DID NOT LET THEM HAVE THE DAY OFF WORK AND THEIR COUNTIES ONLY ALLOW ABSENTEE MAIL IN VOTING IN MINIMAL CIRCUMSTANCES YOURE JUST BEING MEAN TO POOR PEOPLE
Even most of the conservatives aren’t bad tbh. The biggest thing that gets to me is that so many people vote against their best interest, but it’s a matter of recognizing it as a flaw in the system instead of reflective of one’s character. There’s a huge difference between voting for Trump because you make over $400k a year and benefit from his tax plan and voting for Trump bc he said tariffs will make you richer.
voting is still reflective of one's character in a flawed system (2 things can be true at once) and there is functionally no difference between people who vote the same for different reasons. whether it's taxes, thinking they'll be rich, or hating brown people, they ultimately all worked in cahoots to put the same racist rapist felon with anti-constitutional dreams in office
It’s desperate people. They want something and don’t care how they get it. To them the ends justify the means. My cousin struggled with addiction on and off for much of his life and he (as well as many others) would go to extreme measures to keep getting a fix once he ran out of money. That included stealing a lot from family members.
stop infantilizing them. it's patronizing and a disgusting minimization of their agency. you're literally just explaining that they voted for the racist rapist felon out of self interest (duh) as if that changes anything about the blatant immorality of it simply put: an explanation is not an excuse
It’s mineralizing agency to discuss the impacts of education system failure, two party system failure, propaganda, and desperation has on a population. No one said it’s an excuse, they simply say it’s a reason, like you’re claiming, so the solution can be dealt with. Because “you’re fucking stupid and I hate you” isn’t a solution
you're gonna be watching them march black and brown people to camps still stroking it to how you're so cooperative and understanding with conservatives you spend all this energy telling leftists that right wingers and trump voters really aren't that bad and had no agency and expect me to take you seriously? politics is very obviously a spectator sport for you buddy, but voting is not a spectator sport, and voters are not innocent bystanders
Also there is no “spirit of Dixie.” In the context you’re using, I’m going to assume you’re referring to the policies promoted during the American Civil War and the succession of the Confederacy from the Union. I am a strong advocate for the South building itself up, bettering the economies and such of our states, but this cannot be done by leaving a large part of our population in the dust. Unity and strength cannot happen when racist, homophobic, and classist rhetoric is still being spoken (1)
Ok. So your neighbor has a little garage he does auto repairs in. He illegally dumps all the (sometimes hazardous) waste fluids in the street when it rains You would tell him it's all good, he's excused because he has no agency thanks to propaganda, lobbying and desperation inflicted by Chevron, Saudi Aramco, etc? He's absolved from responsibility when the neighbor kid is hospitalized from brake fluid in his water? No characteristic implications of selfishness, recklessness or carelessness?
No. But I wouldn’t assume he’s doing it out of lack of care. I’d assume he’s doing it out of lack of understanding the harm he’s causing. I’d let him know that 1- it is illegal in most places and 2- what direct harm it causes. If he genuinely believes it’s ok bc of bad information, I’m the type of person that would genuinely take the time to deconstruct that and help them unlearn and rebuild his knowledge from good information. Hanlons razor is my guiding factor here
You’re not quite understanding the point, and that’s ok. It doesn’t absolve you from responsibility, nobody said that. I asked a philosophical extreme to promote thought, which clearly nobody wants to do here. C’est la vie. But understanding how someone’s choices are formed, what contributed to it, only impacts how we can successfully go about changing their choices, not absolving from responsibility or consequences
I'm not missing your point at all. I think it's valid to be a friendly face in reconstructing/deradicalizing. I think it's ineffective coalition building to expect everybody else to do the same, or to defend ppl who are (obviously) downplaying and excusing the extreme thinking that's being normalized among conservatives. Diversity of tactics is crucial