Anonymous #1 1w

I believe New York post. Let me double check

5

Anonymous #1 1w

The New York post actually tried to paint them as having a trans partner, buuuuut as always they hide the info behind a clickbait headline that makes people not bother reading. The article actually contradicts the headline a shit ton. Family of the alleged partner said he wasn’t.

6

Anonymous OP 1w

Quote it let’s go.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Gooooglleee bro. I have work to do I can’t keep being on yikyak lol. The only source we have of this claim is from the Utah governor who has been caught lying about this already, so I guess believe him if you want but don’t be shocked if he turns out to be lying. The same governed who threw a tantrum on tv over it being a white person from Utah and not an immigrant.

-2

Anonymous #1 1w

Here’s a breakdown https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT6ESJjHW/

1

Anonymous #1 1w

But it’s funny you’re believing something only being reported by Fox and the New York post lol. Nobody else. If it were true, it would be everywhere. You know how typically when writing papers you need at least 5 sources? The same could be said about believing news.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

No no I want a quote. For someone so confident that Fox and other sources are flat out wrong it should be easy to quote it

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

Aaaand while we are at it talking about sources. Reminder that a site using an other site as a source is not a source, it’s just repeating what they heard.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

I mean. The fact that Fox doesn’t have any actual information outside of what an anonymous source told them. This is their “article”. On it. Brooke said she was told by “sources” which is journalism speak for either “I made it up” or “my source isn’t great I wanna save myself if they’re bullshitting”

1

Anonymous #1 1w

So you are believing a claim made by someone with no verifiable evidence, just word of mouth. Thats no better than seeing someone run their mouth on Facebook and taking it at face value without questioning it

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Ok but I’m asking you for a direct quote that disproves what Fox News which is not gonna get sued by making up something false is saying

1

Anonymous #1 1w

You’d think that the fact that Fox doesn’t have a source alone would be enough for you. It’s again funny that there is no information about this alleged partner either. Like a conveniently made up person

1

Anonymous #1 1w

This is the “proof” they are trans. A TikTok filter that auto selects a filter for you based on your fave shape.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Face***

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Would you like to give me a source outside of Fox and the New York post that confirms this? And list their sources? Because that is a pretty straight forward standard part of verifying sources.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Well actually nah. I think we should probably wait until the fbi confirms anything, but that’s also a shakey road bc the fbi is already in hot water for releasing false info 3 times. And arresting the wrong person twice.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

So you have no proof. Basically all you’ve said is “nuh uh that disproves my narrative”

1

Anonymous #1 1w

No, it’s hard to disprove something that has so little backing, because the only ones talking about it are these two sources. Nobody else. So give me an actual verifiable source? With actual information.

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Watching you cope cuz your narrative is destroyed is so funny

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Okay then give me a source lol.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

One with -information -name of sources -a name of anyone at all -date for when this happened -etc

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Fox literally said their source was the FBI. Do you think that Fox is gonna make themselves liable to a lawsuit for making up a claim from the fbi

1