Anonymous #2 6d

Bro what? Ur saying we should shame the gay sons of homophobic and hateful pastors because of the bigotry of their family members? For something that is harmless in an of itself? Just don’t make no sense

-1

Anonymous #3 6d

What about being a sissy makes it inherently transphobic and bad? Can someone not be sexually aroused by those things in an ethical way? This is a serious question.

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Should we shame Noem? Yes - constantly. I just don’t agree with targeting family members with leaked information to weaponize against them, as opposed to the politicians. Imagine if we harassed Vivian for being trans, simply because she is Elon’s daughter. It leaves a poor taste in my mouth.

-1

Anonymous OP 6d

Because the conception of femininity and womanhood that goes with it is super misogynistic, particularly because it goes hand in hand with humiliation (i.e. femininity is humiliating). the shit those dudes say about trans women is horrific

3

Anonymous OP 6d

The difference here is I'm not calling for shame on the child. The child born into that situation has no control of it. Byron could have easily divorced her and left but he didn't. He had control. I think it's hypocritical to stay with a woman who demonizes a group that you are apart of while a child can't choose what family they are born into.

8

Anonymous #3 6d

What about wanting to be degraded and to present as feminine in a sexual context is inherently wrong? I just don’t know if I agree that we should be morally policing other people’s sex lifes, even if a portion of the community says poor things about trans people. I don’t really see how that generalization means nobody should be able to enjoy any of that stuff.

5

Anonymous #2 6d

I just will never be convinced to think using leaked sexual content, especially kink content is okay. To me, it gives the vibe people want to shame someone for this kink - this just gives them a “justifiable” outlet. It’s like mocking a shitty person for being fat, and reinforces the overall social standard that the behavior is unnacceptable.

0

Anonymous OP 6d

Just trust me friend, that aspect of cross dressing and kink is a fucking CISPIT of fetishized racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, basically it’s where conservatives get their views on trans/gay people

3

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 6d

Besides, we’re talking about someone who supports Kristi Noem, do we really need to make up a reason to laugh at this guy

11

Anonymous #4 6d

I mean this with respect, but if the only reason you can give as to why someone shouldn’t be able to practice a sex act with a consenting adult is “trust me bro” i’m prone to disagree.

0

Anonymous #7 6d

This.

4

Anonymous #7 5d

The difference is that sissy stuff is a super misogynistic, unethical fetish.

-1

Anonymous #3 5d

I’ve asked multiple times for you to explain why, but everyone has refused to give me a reason it’s unethical except for “trust me bro”. If you’re going to push a narrative that we should restrict what consenting adults can do in the privacy of their own bedroom - you should at least be able to substantiate why that thing is harmful.

6

Anonymous #5 5d

Would you make fun of someone’s body who’s body shamed in the past? How do you think people who agree with you, but look similar to the thing you’re making fun of will take that? I think this is just a roundabout way to both shit on a horrible person’s family, while also using it to reastbalish gender roles, ostracizing a person for behaving in a private manner sexually in a way that society doesn’t approve of.

1