Not everyone should have free speech. This person is a great example. I wish the government had more flexibility to stop some people from being so nasty and insufferable. This post just ruined my morning
I barely knew who Charlie Kirk was but I’ve seen so many videos of him in the past couple weeks so I now I think I have a better idea… dig him up and shoot him again lmao
Free Speech for me, but not for those that say something I disagree with or that makes me feel icky.
19
🫕
Anonymous5w
see I knew you mfs weren’t actually about free speech
9
🫕
Anonymous5w
for context since the failed counter to my argument that free speech protects meanness got taken down, hopefully by OP for realizing the insane false equivalence they’d just drawn between “being mean” and “making threats”
1
Anonymouscheese_of_the_world_unite5w
That's not even free speech bro.
That's just being nasty and talking bull shit for no reason to be edgy
-2
Anonymouscheese_of_the_world_unite5w
This person could’ve went their entire lives without saying this
-2
🫕
AnonymousOP5w
Free speech is the right to be nasty and talk bullshit lmao
5
Anonymouscheese_of_the_world_unite5w
Not really. Then I should be able to tell someone I’m going to kill you or there’s a bomb in the building. Freedom of speech should have certain limits to protect everyone and stop hateful and dangerous speech
-1
🫕
AnonymousOP5w
Those are active threats, not just nasty bullshit, fucking dumbass. I can tell you the sensible restrictions on free speech that exist, but “you can’t be mean” is not one of them.
4
Anonymouscheese_of_the_world_unite5w
That guy is calling to “shoot him again” that’s an active threat on Charlie Kirk and his family.
-3
🫕
AnonymousOP5w
You can’t threaten a corpse, and his family is mentioned nowhere in that post. It’s not a threat, it’s just a shitty thing to say. And you’re allowed to call it a shitty thing to say, that’s part of YOUR freedom of speech.