Anonymous #1 11w

No 43 year old man has any business sending a minor $250 “for being my friend” and $400 for “being awesome”

12

Anonymous OP 11w

Bruh I’ve sent my little sister and her friends cashapps for like $5-20 bucks for stupid shit they ask for. Should I go to jail for that too? No

-5

Anonymous #1 11w

That's your little sister and her friends, you're not a 40-year old man paying young girls "for being [his] friend."

7

Anonymous yellow_socks67 11w

Idek his relation to that girl. What if it’s just a youth from church. And I wouldn’t focus on the monetary value of the cash sent bc he’s rich so that $400 could be $1 to him

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

"Well, what if he gave them money for chocolates and candy bc he likes them so much??" We can speculate on any number of reasons he has for these transactions, but more often than not, politicians who try to keep the transactions they send to younger women who have no relation to him a secret usually aren't giving them money for legal reasons.

6

Anonymous #1 11w

I mean it's not even a big deal now that the investigation is said and done but the released report confirmed he paid a 17-year old for sex in 2017.

4

Anonymous #1 11w

It’s quite literally not there’s transcripts of his text messages to these minors saying “hey me and my buddy are kinda strapped this week, are you cool with doing this on the house this and we’ll get it back to you later?”

0

Anonymous OP 11w

The committee found credible evidence that he had sex with the 17-year old in June 2017, but because of Florida's statute of limitations on the state's rape laws, the DOJ could not pursue charges. When you consider the evidence and the timeframes presented, it lines up pretty snugly, but sure, he could just be hanging out with a bunch of random underage girls. What do you expect from a politician?

4