Anonymous #1 11w

i can’t help but notice that this is not a comprehensive definition of socialism.

24

Anonymous #2 11w

Definitions dont have to be "comprehensive" to be accurate. The one i provided is backed up by hours of research

-4

Anonymous #1 11w

You have two words as the definition : “government overreach” … that is unhelpful to the debate and seems purposefully obtuse. if you want a debate, it makes sense to start with a basic unbiased definition like in the dictionary or, more appropriately, your textbooks.

20

Anonymous #1 11w

Buddy, “government overreach” is not the definition of socialism lmao.

19

Anonymous #1 11w

Yes. Yes they do. For example. Define fruit Apples are fruit Yes but that’s not comprehensive So what

11

Anonymous #2 11w

Trump is imposing illegal tariffs. Mamdani is trying to impose Sharia law. Both are going beyond their consititutional powers. Hitler became a dictator by doing the same. OVERREACH is the common denominator

-4

Anonymous OP 11w

Buddy, I'm literally a poli sci major.

-5

Anonymous #1 11w

No it is not.

15

Anonymous #2 11w

Also, I consult research not textbooks

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

If the common denominator was “overreach” then every single corrupt government is socialist. Which is fucking stupid.

15

Anonymous #3 11w

Yeah but governments are more complicated then fruits

-4

Anonymous OP 11w

I’m going to suggest we block #1 because they’re obviously trolling with the poly sci, no textbook, Sharia law combo

5

Anonymous #1 11w

Not according to your logic so far, your logic has literally boiled down to “government bad mean socialist”

10

Anonymous #3 11w

"i can't prove you wrong" "you must be a troll" Nice argument 🤣

-3

Anonymous OP 11w

well all bad governments are socialist and vice versa

-4

Anonymous OP 11w

not every government. For example, Schumer and Jeffries use common sense in the federal government while Newsom is the best governor in a century. All have more centrist policies and are therefor not socialist

-4

Anonymous #1 11w

Therefore* dipshit

12

Anonymous #1 11w

Your poly sci professors are very disappointed lmao.

12

Anonymous OP 11w

ad hominem attacks on spelling doesnt make you right. also my professors let me do my own research hows that for disappointment

-3

Anonymous #1 11w

Using 6 definitions wrong in comments with spelling errors doesn’t make you right either. Honestly this is some SEC school shit

11

Anonymous #1 11w

“Eh this guys stupid just let them do whatever. Tell them to do ‘their own research’ lol” - #1s professors

10

Anonymous #3 11w

Well nobody has yet proven me incorrect

-1

Anonymous OP 11w

Jealous much 🤣

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

Ignorance is bliss, I suppose maybe I am. It’s hard not being stupid.

5

Anonymous OP 11w

Well at least you admit it. Leave the voting to centrists until your more educated

-1

Anonymous #1 11w

You mean the fat and elderly and brain dead? No sorry I’m gonna keep voting for extreme left candidates thanks

4

Anonymous #1 11w

Buddy, I’m literally not a polisci major, but I can tell you “government overreach” is *NOT* the definition of socialism

5

Anonymous OP 11w

Well if you live in nyc you can vote single ticket for trump and mamdani aka the SOCIALISTS

-1

Anonymous xi.jinping 11w

well literally AM a poli sci major and im telling government overreach is the defining trait of socialism (ive done the research to prove it)

-3

Anonymous #1 11w

Yet you never checked a dictionary during that research. Your methods are flawed

13

Anonymous xi.jinping 11w

The dictionary is bought out by socialist billionaires and collaborators with trump. Anyone who trusts them is immediately not worth considering, thats why i do my own research

-2

Anonymous #1 11w

Storm front doesn’t count

10

Anonymous #1 11w

Just out of curiosity what are your research sources?

14

Anonymous #1 11w

You have to be bullshitting. There’s no way you’re being serious

17