Anonymous #1 12w

I mean she was. What danger did she present

-7

Anonymous OP 12w

She was trespassing on federal property during an armed plot to overthrow the election…

17

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 12w

So your fine with being shot and killed for you opinion but shooting someone driving a car at you is wrong? Please make that make sense

-3

Anonymous #1 12w

Was she armed? Or posing a threat?

-4

Anonymous OP 12w

Yes

11

Anonymous #4 12w

And which one out of the three posed an actualy immanent threat?

-2

Anonymous OP 12w

Babbit

13

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 12w

What threat was she posing

-3

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 12w

What threat did she pose?

-4

Anonymous OP 12w

Potential serious injury or death to the officer and members of congress

11

Anonymous #1 12w

By climbing into a window unarmed?

-3

Anonymous OP 12w

The 3 racists.

4

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 12w

You gonna answer?

-3

Anonymous OP 12w

I think we can all agree that shooting at someone when the car is already in motion makes absolutely zero sense. That’s not going to stop the car. Just move tf out of the way

11

Anonymous #4 12w

So shooting and killing someone for their opinion is cool. But shooting someone driving there car at you is wrong? Make that make sense please

-3

Anonymous OP 12w

Hard to claim self defense when the car idea actively moving away from you

9

Anonymous OP 12w

Yes? The Capitol is a secured facility, who tf knows what she had on her

16

Anonymous OP 12w

Racist rhetoric has its consequences

7

Anonymous OP 12w

During an active riot, everyone is considered a threat

12

Anonymous #1 12w

Oh, turns out we do know

9

Anonymous #1 12w

I don’t think it was right to shoot her but he has the legality to do it. Now, I need to know why people think that being shot for your opinion is right but shooting someone who’s driving there car at you is wrong

-3

Anonymous OP 12w

She wasn’t driving it at anyone. Maybe go watch the video

8

Anonymous OP 12w

Him shooting at the driver of a moving vehicle directly contradicts DHS policy

0

Anonymous #4 12w

By the time the first shot was fired, she was moving towards him

-2

Anonymous #1 12w

So it’s actually illegal to shoot and kill somone because you THINK they might do something in the future

-2

Anonymous #1 12w

*away

6

Anonymous #4 12w

I’ve watched it multiple times in slow motion. I know what I saw

-3

Anonymous OP 12w

Either way, she’s trespassing in a secured area

7

Anonymous #1 12w

You should get your eyes checked then, because every video shows driving away, not towards

7

Anonymous #4 12w

She reversed, then drove forwards. While she was moving forwards, the first shot hit.

-1

Anonymous #1 12w

Forwards to the right, away from the Nazi.

3

Anonymous OP 12w

My life isn’t on Yikyak dong fucking “are u gonna answer” me. I have a life holy fuck. Secondly, was opinions it was just uneducated bigotry. She didn’t drive the car into him

9

Anonymous OP 12w

She stormed the capital and trespassed on federal property

11

Anonymous OP 12w

Bro she broke into one of the most secure buildings in the country, with armed mob that had a gallows outside for the Representatives. No fuckin shit she got shot. And if you can’t realize why, maybe college isn’t for you

5

Anonymous #1 12w

He was not the car and you can see her wheels turned away from him and him put of the way before he shoots her through her side window three times, refuses to render aid, and then flees the scene like the common criminal he is. But I guess since the federal government told you she tried to hit him, you gotta listen to Daddy Government.

4

Anonymous thereal._.ruckus 12w

She was even given medical assistance! Imagine that, giving medical assistance to someone you’ve just shot that should totally be the norm it’s not like ICE would block medical assistance right?

5