Anonymous #1 5w

Triggered much, damn. Hahaha

14

Anonymous #1 5w

And yet they’re both ass at their jobs

17

Anonymous #1 5w

You can be a draft dodger and a chief but he cannot act like he’s better than the decorated veterans because he didn’t do the bare minimum for his country

6

Anonymous #3 5w

And yet he’s still their boss and if they storm out during his meeting they’ll get fired

-2

Anonymous #1 5w

He’s the one telling them to leave…

1

Anonymous #1 5w

And if you wanna go there in any other job, if you call a colleague, a slur, or just a rude name, you will be written up and if it happens on multiple occurrences, you will be fired. Yet no one has bothered the fire him

2

Anonymous #3 5w

“Leave and see what happens” has never been an invitation to leave, it’s a warning. And you know that

-1

Anonymous #3 5w

He’s the boss. That’s not how it works

-1

Anonymous #1 5w

If a CEO is calling colleagues slurs or rude comment, they usually are kicked off the board. That is how it works. He is completely unprofessional and in any other job circumstance he would be fired.

3

Anonymous #1 5w

If a CEO is making sexual remarks two, the press about people who just disagrees with him, that usually ends up with him being fired by the board. He is not a responsible person and he also is way too fucking old to be president.

4

Anonymous #3 5w

It’s not a 1:1 comparison. There is no board, there are no shareholders. It is the commander in chief of the military who says mean words sometimes. It’s the fucking military dude, thicker skin should be a basic requirement

-1

Anonymous #3 5w

“Way too old to be president” wasn’t a problem when Joe was there. If you have a problem with democracy just say that. Otherwise accept the fact that a man was voted into the position he currently holds by a majority

-1

Anonymous #1 5w

There are no shareholders, but there is a board like system. Congress and the House of Representatives are the “board“ in this situation. They have failed just as much as our president as they have not put in the works to fire and unqualified candidate.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

To have a employee that is racist, homophobic, and misogynistic and openly complains and uses these hateful opinions to push his agenda is completely unconstitutional and makes him not qualified as president. Furthermore qualifies him for impeachment.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

I’m curious to why you were bringing up Joe Biden, I fucking hate Joe Biden, too. He’s way too old to be president, and he was not the candidate elected. He was not even in the primaries as that was Kamala Harris. I don’t understand your fallacy to bring up someone not related to the subject at all. I agree that Joe Biden was too fucking old to be president. I don’t understand how that negates what I’ve said.

1

Anonymous #3 5w

Congress and the House not the board, no. They didnt appoint him into his position, the people did. And idk what constitution you’re reading but a guy saying mean words or having opinions you disagree on has ZERO to do with “constitutional”

0

Anonymous #1 5w

And we can accept the fact that he has historically low acceptance rate of the general public only to be beat by his last terms historic low acceptance rate. Majority of Americans do not want him as president right now and do not agree with anything that he is currently doing. He absolutely qualifies for impeachment by the dozen of unconstitutional jurisdiction, he is trying to press onto American citizens.

1

Anonymous #3 5w

How is Biden NOT relevant when he was just present before the current guy and was even older? He was also voted in, so that makes him qualified to be president. You don’t get to decide the rules, the rules decide the rules

0

Anonymous #1 5w

It is not my opinion that multiple judges have claimed that what he is doing with his executive orders is unconstitutional. There has been over a dozen judges, stating that he is unconstitutional, which means by definition he is unconstitutional. That again means he is eligible for impeachment.

1

Anonymous #3 5w

If that were the case he would be impeached and convicted. But he’s not. Once again, you don’t get to make the rules up on a whim, the rules already exist

1

Anonymous #1 5w

He’s not relevant because he was not the primary candidate. And furthermore, I fucking hate Biden and did not agree that he should run so I don’t understand why you’re trying to shift the blame.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

I am not making the rules up on a whim. I am just acknowledging that he has over and over repeatedly been unconstitutional according to Judge ruling. This is not a difference of opinion it is fact that judges have claimed and have told him to stop what he’s doing because it is unconstitutional. He has been told multiple times to stop his executive orders because they are against the constitution.

2

Anonymous #3 5w

Individual judges make rulings and he appeals. Thats literally how the legal system is designed. It is working as intended. And once again, he’s still relevant because YOU brought up age as a qualification. Something that only exists as a minimum

1