Anonymous #1 3d

I agree, that’s why I support DJT recent executive order which cuts down on birthright citizenship and really gets to what the 14th amendment actually meant

-13

Anonymous #2 3d

Conservatives that hate the constitution, surprise surprise

21

Anonymous #2 3d

The courts already ruled on what the 14th amendment actually meant over 100 years ago. Check out US v Wong Kim Ark. FOH with your dumb ass legal arguments unless you want DC v Heller overturned too

7

Anonymous #2 3d

you are actually stupid as fuck 😂😂

8

Anonymous #1 3d

I don’t hate the constitution that’s just not what they meant. How you xommies have been interpreting it.

-5

Anonymous #2 20h

Hey there buddy, it’s not what they meant. Even Ilan Wurman, the leading legal “scholar” supporting Trump on citizenship, doesn’t argue that it’s what the framers originally meant.

2

Anonymous #3 20h

What’s dc vs heller #3

0

Anonymous #2 12h

The court case that ruled that the second amendment protects the rights of individuals to own firearms

1

Anonymous #3 9h

Well that’s because that’s what the 2nd amendment meant ??

1