Anonymous #2 1d

The secretary of war crimes is an actual alcoholic

20

Anonymous #1 1d

The mf just used twitter to say an entire civilization will die

21

Anonymous #3 1d

Whataboutism

-6

Anonymous #2 1d

Seems kinda relevant to a discussion about unstable people running the military actually

19

Anonymous OP 1d

That wasn’t the discussion

-5

Anonymous #6 1d

Harris being the same as Trump to many people just means many people were wrong

9

Anonymous #2 1d

What tf did you think the discussion was????

10

Anonymous OP 1d

many many many people were wrong, but they'll never admit it

10

Anonymous #6 1d

True

3

Anonymous #1 1d

Genuinely what makes you come to that conclusion? The fact that past democrats have taken some illegal military actions makes you think that Kamala would be AS bad as trump? Why would that be the case?

2

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1d

It would be hilarious if Kamala won and we still waged war on Iran, just in a more quiet and subtle way. And all her supporters wouldn’t mention it or find justifications for it. Partisan politics is a cancer

7

Anonymous OP 1d

About Kamala’s substance abuse issues

-7

Anonymous #2 1d

Oh, so what you’re referring to is your comment that actually was whataboutism? (And untrue to boot!)

11

Anonymous OP 1d

Bad bait

-5

Anonymous #8 1d

Just another “if” about something that obviously wouldn’t have happened

8

Anonymous #8 1d

I just don’t see much use in getting worked up over theoreticals, she didn’t win and hasn’t supported the war in Iran. There are massive issues with partisan politics of course but let’s focus on the things that have actually happened

5

Anonymous #8 1d

she would've gone to congress for approval and had a plan about it which would not have resulted in this outcome. still would have been highly opposed, but you have to admit she would have done the bare minimum which trump does not care to do.

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1d

Not only that, but her national security advisor was an architect of the Iran nuclear deal and a big opponent of war! These people are not only wrong, they’re making up situations opposite to reality!

11

Anonymous #6 1d

She wouldn’t have even tried war in the first place, I’m not sure why everybody’s making that part up now

3

Anonymous OP 1d

That’s why I wanted to know 1’s reasoning, I feel like almost the whole reason trump is able to get away with doing such a shitty job is because people defend this “it would’ve been just as bad with the other candidate” thing for him and I’m not sure why they do it

1

Anonymous OP 1d

oh no i'm not saying she would've! i'm just saying IF she ever did, she would've followed the correct path to do so

1

Anonymous #2 1d

she isnt, he is. cant virtue signal concerns potentially for others and then jump with glee when the same thing happens on your side

7

Anonymous #2 1d

the discussion is literally a comparison between the two admins about which would be worse. it's not whataboutism if the point of the convo is to compare. regurgitating debate buzzwords doesn't make you sound smart - quite the opposite actually

4