blue__wave on Yik Yak | Looking at the 14 points it looks like we’re getting what we want out of this conflict. This doesn’t make Trump good, this was a situation he totally blundered his way into. I’m not gonna give the president credit for cleaning a mess he made.

Yik Yak

Download

Join communities on Yik Yak Download

🌊

US Politics 16w

blue__wave

Looking at the 14 points it looks like we’re getting what we want out of this conflict. This doesn’t make Trump good, this was a situation he totally blundered his way into. I’m not gonna give the president credit for cleaning a mess he made.

Anonymous 16w

You won’t give him credit, but unfortunately a lot of other people will

Anonymous 16w

But… what did we get out of the conflict?? Iran has always officially declared that they are not making nuclear weapons, even in the Obama deal. They just wanted to keep 3.67% of enriched uranium or whatever (idk the actual details)

Anonymous 16w

The deal is designed to fail, the literal first point is an end to the war including Lebanon. Israel has already said they are not stopping the war in Lebanon, therefore no deal

Anonymous

#1 16w

The saving grace is that some other calamity usually pops up b/c that’s life under Trump

Anonymous

#1 16w

National calamity**

🌊

Anonymous

#2 16w

When he said the nuclear weapons grade material was “obliterated” it probably wasn’t actually so it’s good to get the nuclear material out of Iran.

Anonymous

blue__wave 16w

But.. the memorandum just says that they’ll dilute it right? To 3.67% like the Obama deal? I don’t think it specified a number

🌊

Anonymous

#1 16w

unfortunately true, he just causes issues and then somehow gets credit for solving the issues he creates. This just the cycle we’re in were he causes an issue and then solves it or pretends to solve it.

🌊

Anonymous

#3 16w

If that’s true and Israel hasn’t changed their tune then it’s just more political embarrassment for Trump.

🌊

Anonymous

#2 16w

I haven’t seen a specific number either I’m assuming that’ll be in the long term deal this is just the 60 day deal.

Anonymous

#2 16w

Hmmm so I guess Iran wasn’t complying with the Obama deal ever since 2019, but that’s since Trump pulled out in 2018 anyways (so US breached it first). However, I think they violated the NPT, not just by the enrichment, but by not declaring their material, not explaining their material, not inspecting. In 2025 IAEA found Iran in non-compliance

Anonymous

blue__wave 16w

Seeing as Israel bombed Lebanon within hours of the deal being signed I’d say it’s already fallen through. Israel currently occupies over 600 square kilometers of southern Lebanese sovereign territory. We will be back to war in a month tops

Anonymous

blue__wave 16w

I think the issue is that Iran did comply with the JCPOA until Trump withdrew in 2018. And was generally compliant with NPT then too. IAEA had repeatedly verified that. So, I think under Obama, they were not a nuclear threat. 🤔🤔 not sure if a lower # Is better

🌊

Anonymous

#2 16w

No evidence points to them being compliant before Trump withdrew

🌊

Anonymous

#3 16w

This happens with most ceasefires in the region they take shots at each other right after. Only time will tell. Israel and Iran did the same thing after the one exchange that feels like forever ago now.

🌊

Anonymous

#2 16w

Or no evidence shows them going against the deal lol.

Anonymous

blue__wave 16w

… they were compliant before Trump withdrew (2015-2018) At least per this https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2018-06-08/iaea-report-confirms-irans-compliance-jcpoa

Anonymous

blue__wave 16w

I would agree, but when you have the Israeli national security advisor saying they will not stop I prefer to take them on their word

🌊

Anonymous

#2 16w

Sorry you’re correct I’m just mistyping lol.

🌊

Anonymous

#3 16w

When he say that?

🌊

Anonymous

#3 16w

Looking into I think you’re right, I think it might complicate the deal. Unless Iran is fine with them occupying southern Lebanon for the foreseeable future