Yik Yak icon
Join communities on Yik Yak Download
oh so we’re cooked ok
301 upvotes, 40 comments. Yik Yak image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "oh so we’re cooked ok"
upvote 301 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

saw this on tiktok, the propaganda machine is churning…

post
upvote 135 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

“Make it easier to build housing to suppress rising rents/housing density” *monkey’s paw curls*

upvote 17 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

What does blind spot mean

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

so you’re telling me all of the urban exploration i’ve done ignoring those signs of “asbestos warning” was just me being ahead of the times?!? wow love to see it (asbestos is bad but sometimes idc abandoned tuberculosis centers are cool as shit inside)

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

FUCKING FINALLY I CAN EAT GOOD

upvote 11 downvote
🐝
Anonymous 13w

Wait what site is this? I like the blind spot system

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

No amount of asbestos is considered safe. Products that contain greater than 1 percent of asbestos minerals are considered to be asbestos-containing. The more asbestos you are exposed to, the more likely you are to get an asbestos disease. Asbestosis and lung cancer are dose-related diseases.

upvote 10 downvote
🫕
Anonymous 13w

they bringing it back

post
upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

They’ll probably allow the public dumping of it too

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

sigh…….at this point sure why not

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 13w

honey we’ve BEEN cooked. the republican party is a death cult that exists solely to maximize human suffering

upvote 1 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

I think it means that media outlets from that side of the political spectrum aren’t reporting on it as much

upvote 54 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> purog 13w

What about the graphic at the bottom

upvote 6 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

Only 13% of reporting on this is from right leaning media outlets I believe. PLEASE correct me if i’m wrong.

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> purog 13w

I mean I don’t know what that app is so this is all just interpretation

upvote 8 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

50% of reporting comes from left leaning outlets and 37% from outlets in the center of the spectrum

upvote 26 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> purog 13w

That’s probably right

upvote 6 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

I’ve seen this type of graphic before from this exact app but idk what the app is called

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> purog 13w

Ground News?

upvote 12 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

YES ITS FROM HERE https://ground.news/article/trumps-epa-reconsiders-bidens-asbestos-ban

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> purog 13w

Bruh they should let me copy and paste link now I have to type it out manually 😩

upvote 7 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

Yeah it’s a flaw in the system. Sorry bro.

upvote 18 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

It's ground news. That graph is party spread based on percentage of coverage

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> bitch_ass_bee 13w

Ground News

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

next time take a screen shot, don’t even have to save it to photos. click on it in the bottom left and hold down on the link and you can copy/open the link

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

just to clarify purog is completely right and i recommend ground news highly

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> bitch_ass_bee 13w

ground news. might get a vantage plan eventually but this is the free version. good objective news source data bank and compares headlines across other news sources

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 13w

Not necessarily objective news but more so that it gives you multiple perspectives to find the truth in between

upvote 6 downvote
📈
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

Ground news really helped me understand that 80% of news articles are copy pasted from other news articles lol. Good site but not for local/state news imo

upvote 8 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> #16 13w

1% is too high

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 13w

Screen shot it and copy and paste from ur camera roll

upvote 2 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> cheese_of_the_world_unite 13w

You joke but RFK has joined the war on cancer on the side of the cancer

post
upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 13w

It’s only being reconsidered due to legal obligations under the TSCA to reassess the risk and necessity. The EPA knows it’s dangerous, and it will be banned, but they’re kinda being forced to reconsider simply due to poorly written old laws. The same thing would have happened under a Harris administration as well.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #21 13w

Translation "Biden made a law, and it was good so I'm cancelling it and making a new one so I look good" that's what he's been doing this whole fucking time, except his deals are shit.

upvote 13 downvote
🫕
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 13w

“80% of smokers don’t get lung cancer” is such a funny argument because it’s like, yeah but 87% of lung cancer cases are smokers.

upvote 4 downvote
🐸
Anonymous replying to -> just_peachy_ 13w

That’s WAY up from the non smokers and a not insignificant amount of non smokers get lung cancer from second hand smoke (from smokers)

upvote 4 downvote
🫕
Anonymous replying to -> cheese_of_the_world_unite 13w

The 20% of smokers who get lung cancer make up almost 90% of people who will get lung cancer in their lifetime. I think that’s a risk informed adults should be allowed to take like they are now, but I feel like RFK is probably arguing against the Surgeon General’s Warning on cigarettes.

upvote 4 downvote
🍑
Anonymous replying to -> cheese_of_the_world_unite 13w

Damn that would be great to show RFK if he could read

upvote 5 downvote
🫕
Anonymous replying to -> cheese_of_the_world_unite 13w

Like, I smoke cigarettes, I know they’re not good for me, but I also know that if I quit by 30 my chances of lung cancer drop pretty dramatically. But yeah lifelong smokers are the highest risk factor group for lung cancer, that’s just a fact.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 13w

How does this have more likes than the actual information

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #24 13w

Because they already know everything apparently

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 13w

The Toxic Substances Control Act was passed in 1976… no laws were made or removed to cause this issue, it’s just a mistake in the fine print that was never corrected half a century ago. Don’t get me wrong I’m not the biggest fan of Trump either, but it’s a bit of stretch to blame Trump for an Act that was passed when he was 20 years old lol

upvote 1 downvote