Anonymous #1 6d

Because of the bots telling them too.

10

Anonymous #2 6d

Uhh right…

1

Anonymous #1 6d

At its peak, 49% of posts calling for a boycott were from bots 😭

11

Anonymous #1 6d

I mean do you take grievance with that? It’s pretty clear that bots drove the outrage

10

Anonymous #2 6d

Yea I think you have the tail wagging the dog on this one

1

Anonymous #1 6d

That seems a little daft. Modern politics is objectively driven by swaths of online bots. That’s the most successful method of social control, it’s why Facebook tried to introduce bots on their platforms officially. They want it to be normalized because it gives them more control over public thought.

13

Anonymous #1 6d

It’s actually so easy to influence public opinion with bots

1

Anonymous #2 6d

Incorrect, the bots saw the trend and sought to capitalize on the attention. That new logo was objectively terrible from a country perspective. Had people not been given a warning and they saw the new logo on their restraints, let’s just say all the lit kerosene lamps would be knocked over

5

Anonymous #2 6d

You still have it backwards

1