
You would vote for nobody in this election because you have no principles worth taking seriously. This is a race between a member of the fascist party of the United States and a pretty normal guy. If you’re not willing to vote against the Nazi, you don’t get to pretend you’re a serious person.
Where did you get that impression? I believe the right to commit appropriate acts of violence, and therefore to be prepared to commit such acts, is a fundamental right to all persons. I’m not ranking any rights against that one. But even if it were truth that both oppose that right, that means the question isn’t even on the ballot or possible to vote on. I think there’s still a moral duty to vote against the violent white supremacist trying to purge the country of entire demographics.
Like you talk about the Holocaust but my people are the ones they’re rehearsing its early stages with. We’re getting stripped of documentation, profiled by unaccountable police with concentration camps, and told by the literal White House that we will be disarmed, hunted and murdered in the name of counterterrorism. You can’t abstain from an election in the name of genocide prevention when one candidate wants to assist the openly genocidal party and the other one wants to shut them down.
You aren’t listening to me. I’m not fine with banning guns, but that’s not an issue that’s up for voting on right now EXCEPT insofar as one candidate wants to disarm entire communities to kill them and the other doesn’t. Framing this as a gun rights issue is frankly dishonest and nonsensical.
No. What you’re saying is that you wouldn’t vote against genocide or ethnic cleansing. You’re saying you wouldn’t vote against the Klan. And you’re saying you won’t do it because of an issue that LITERALLY is not under dispute in this election. That’s why I say your beliefs aren’t worth taking seriously. Do you even hear yourself right now?
I wouldn't vote for any type of oppression or violation of meaningful rights granted to this country, ever. I seriously doubt that the best you can do is give me empty platitudes of the other side either, and know that in circumstances like these I fully blame your party for claiming to champion our rights in face of this and failing on the most basic of tests.
You see why I have a problem with that answer right? I already told you I think the right to be armed is a fundamental right that must be protected, and with absolutely zero basis you just pull this answer from darkness of your own rectum. I’m an anarchist, a pretty adamantly pro-gun one. But you have kept pretending you have a reason to accuse me of undermining people’s rights or being anti-gun because it’s the only way to justify your bullshit throughout this thread (and it still wouldn’t!)